Multivariate Profiling of Physical Resilience in Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement Surgery: Results from a Prospective Observational Study

Qian-Li Xue, Thomas Laskow, Mallak K Alzahrani, Ravi Varadhan, Jeremy D Walston, Jennifer A Schrack, Anne B Newman, Frederick Sieber, Karen Bandeen-Roche
{"title":"Multivariate Profiling of Physical Resilience in Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement Surgery: Results from a Prospective Observational Study","authors":"Qian-Li Xue, Thomas Laskow, Mallak K Alzahrani, Ravi Varadhan, Jeremy D Walston, Jennifer A Schrack, Anne B Newman, Frederick Sieber, Karen Bandeen-Roche","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background As individuals age, their ability to cope with and recovering from health challenges becomes vital for maintaining independence and quality of life. This study aims to develop a multivariate phenotype of physical resilience based on individual recovery dynamics before and after a physical stressor. Methods This prospective observational study included 104 individuals aged ≥ 60 who underwent elective total knee replacement (TKR) for degenerative joint disease between December 2, 2019, and January 4, 2023. A multivariate resilience phenotype was derived from physical function assessments over 12 months after TKR using the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale Physical Subscale, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Quality of Life Score, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score. Validation was performed using markers (i.e., frailty and self-reported health) and determinants (e.g., the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) of recovery potential. Results Distinct resilience profiles were identified across the four measures, showing varied baseline levels and/or change rates over 12 months. By combining and analyzing resilience profiles across measures, two distinct groups emerged: 33.7% were classified as non-resilient and 66.4% as resilient. The non-resilient group had a higher prevalence of frailty (37.1% vs. 10.1%, p<0.01), poor or fair self-reported health (48.6% vs. 5.8%, p<0.01), and moderate or severe comorbidity burden (CCI >2; 28.6% vs. 10.1%, p=0.03). Conclusions Recovery trajectories after TKR revealed varying resilience levels that could not be fully explained by baseline health status. Understanding individual resilience can enhance patient care by promoting recovery and overall well-being.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background As individuals age, their ability to cope with and recovering from health challenges becomes vital for maintaining independence and quality of life. This study aims to develop a multivariate phenotype of physical resilience based on individual recovery dynamics before and after a physical stressor. Methods This prospective observational study included 104 individuals aged ≥ 60 who underwent elective total knee replacement (TKR) for degenerative joint disease between December 2, 2019, and January 4, 2023. A multivariate resilience phenotype was derived from physical function assessments over 12 months after TKR using the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale Physical Subscale, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Quality of Life Score, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score. Validation was performed using markers (i.e., frailty and self-reported health) and determinants (e.g., the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) of recovery potential. Results Distinct resilience profiles were identified across the four measures, showing varied baseline levels and/or change rates over 12 months. By combining and analyzing resilience profiles across measures, two distinct groups emerged: 33.7% were classified as non-resilient and 66.4% as resilient. The non-resilient group had a higher prevalence of frailty (37.1% vs. 10.1%, p<0.01), poor or fair self-reported health (48.6% vs. 5.8%, p<0.01), and moderate or severe comorbidity burden (CCI >2; 28.6% vs. 10.1%, p=0.03). Conclusions Recovery trajectories after TKR revealed varying resilience levels that could not be fully explained by baseline health status. Understanding individual resilience can enhance patient care by promoting recovery and overall well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing step counting algorithms for high-resolution wrist accelerometry data in older adults in the ARIC study Association of plasma fatty acid profile with trajectory of multimorbidity and mortality: A community-based longitudinal study Multivariate Profiling of Physical Resilience in Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement Surgery: Results from a Prospective Observational Study Incremental Healthcare Costs of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study Machine learning scoring reveals increased frequency of falls proximal to death in Drosophila melanogaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1