Disruptions and energy demand: How Finnish households responded to the energy crisis of 2022

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103977
Kaisa Matschoss , Senja Laakso , Jenny Rinkinen
{"title":"Disruptions and energy demand: How Finnish households responded to the energy crisis of 2022","authors":"Kaisa Matschoss ,&nbsp;Senja Laakso ,&nbsp;Jenny Rinkinen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Europe faced an energy crisis in 2022 because of the Russian war in Ukraine. Households throughout Europe were expected to show solidarity and reduce and shift their energy use. Rapidly rising energy prices threatened the economic survival of many households. Relying on a social practice–theoretical approach, our research empirically examines the experiences of households across Finland during the energy-crisis winter of 2022–2023. Based on focus-group and individual interview data with 82 participants, we examined how households engaged in time-shifting and reducing energy use. We ask what was done differently, whether new technologies were installed, and whether new meanings or competencies were developed. Our findings suggest that households engaged in activities: to reduce and shift energy use for their own economic benefit to avoid large energy bills; to influence their overall energy costs; to ensure the availability of energy to all; and to avoid power cuts (societal benefit) and make everyday life more sustainable (environmental benefit). Households engaged in a variety of practices to reduce and shift energy use, such as reducing indoor temperature, taking fewer hot showers, using electric saunas less often, using wood heating more, and washing dishes and doing laundry at night. We conceptualised demand flexibility as complexes and bundles of energy-related practices and their elements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103977"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Europe faced an energy crisis in 2022 because of the Russian war in Ukraine. Households throughout Europe were expected to show solidarity and reduce and shift their energy use. Rapidly rising energy prices threatened the economic survival of many households. Relying on a social practice–theoretical approach, our research empirically examines the experiences of households across Finland during the energy-crisis winter of 2022–2023. Based on focus-group and individual interview data with 82 participants, we examined how households engaged in time-shifting and reducing energy use. We ask what was done differently, whether new technologies were installed, and whether new meanings or competencies were developed. Our findings suggest that households engaged in activities: to reduce and shift energy use for their own economic benefit to avoid large energy bills; to influence their overall energy costs; to ensure the availability of energy to all; and to avoid power cuts (societal benefit) and make everyday life more sustainable (environmental benefit). Households engaged in a variety of practices to reduce and shift energy use, such as reducing indoor temperature, taking fewer hot showers, using electric saunas less often, using wood heating more, and washing dishes and doing laundry at night. We conceptualised demand flexibility as complexes and bundles of energy-related practices and their elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干扰与能源需求:芬兰家庭如何应对 2022 年的能源危机
由于俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争,欧洲在2022年面临能源危机。整个欧洲的家庭应该团结一致,减少和改变他们的能源使用。快速上涨的能源价格威胁到许多家庭的经济生存。依靠社会实践-理论方法,我们的研究在2022-2023年能源危机冬季期间对芬兰各地家庭的经历进行了实证研究。基于82名参与者的焦点小组和个人访谈数据,我们研究了家庭如何进行时移和减少能源使用。我们问做了什么不同,是否安装了新技术,是否开发了新的意义或能力。我们的研究结果表明,家庭从事的活动:为了自己的经济利益减少和转移能源使用,以避免高额的能源账单;影响他们的整体能源成本;确保人人都能获得能源;避免停电(社会效益),使日常生活更可持续(环境效益)。家庭采取各种措施减少和转移能源使用,例如降低室内温度,减少热水淋浴,减少使用电动桑拿,更多地使用木材加热,以及在晚上洗碗和洗衣服。我们将需求灵活性概念化为与能源相关的实践及其元素的综合体和捆绑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Justice in the spotlight: Do parliamentary debates shape Germany's energy transition? Transmission, turbines, and trust: The social dynamics and narratives of opposition to renewable energy infrastructure in regional Australia When a forest is masked by trees: How French subsurface industries involved in decarbonisation and transition policies are instrumentalising poor social acceptance Understanding policymaker support of energy decarbonization policies for buildings Phasing out diesel subsidies in Colombia: A social contract perspective on stakeholder consultations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1