May-Yin (Ashlyn) Low , David Danaci , Callum Sturman , Camille Petit
{"title":"Quantification of temperature-dependent CO2 adsorption kinetics in Lewatit VP OC 1065, Purolite A110, and TIFSIX-3-Ni for direct air capture","authors":"May-Yin (Ashlyn) Low , David Danaci , Callum Sturman , Camille Petit","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2025.01.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the critical factors affecting the performance of an adsorption-based direct air capture (DAC) process is the CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption kinetics. Yet, this data is not currently available in the literature for many DAC adsorbents, particularly at the relevant conditions for DAC (i.e. ∼ 0.04 %<sub>vol</sub> or 400 ppm). In this study, we report temperature-dependent linear driving force constants (<em>k</em><sub><em>LDF</em></sub><em>(T)</em>) measured at 400 ppm CO<sub>2</sub> between 20 °C and 70 °C for three promising DAC adsorbents: Lewatit VP OC 1065, Purolite A110, and TIFSIX-3-Ni. The experimental data was fitted using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to determine the <em>k</em><sub><em>LDF</em></sub><em>(T)</em> constants with the experimental standard deviation also presented as a fitted parameter, as it was not possible to fully characterise the experimental uncertainty otherwise. TIFSIX-3-Ni exhibits the fastest adsorption kinetics across the whole temperature range, while Purolite A110 has faster adsorption kinetics compared to Lewatit VP OC 1065 at temperatures greater than 40 °C. Overall, the <em>k</em><sub><em>LDF</em></sub><em>(T)</em> values determined in this work can be used for initial process scale modelling to assess the process performance of these adsorbents for DAC, while future work is required to ascertain the controlling diffusion mechanisms, and reaction kinetics, over a wide range of conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"215 ","pages":"Pages 443-452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876225000565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the critical factors affecting the performance of an adsorption-based direct air capture (DAC) process is the CO2 adsorption kinetics. Yet, this data is not currently available in the literature for many DAC adsorbents, particularly at the relevant conditions for DAC (i.e. ∼ 0.04 %vol or 400 ppm). In this study, we report temperature-dependent linear driving force constants (kLDF(T)) measured at 400 ppm CO2 between 20 °C and 70 °C for three promising DAC adsorbents: Lewatit VP OC 1065, Purolite A110, and TIFSIX-3-Ni. The experimental data was fitted using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to determine the kLDF(T) constants with the experimental standard deviation also presented as a fitted parameter, as it was not possible to fully characterise the experimental uncertainty otherwise. TIFSIX-3-Ni exhibits the fastest adsorption kinetics across the whole temperature range, while Purolite A110 has faster adsorption kinetics compared to Lewatit VP OC 1065 at temperatures greater than 40 °C. Overall, the kLDF(T) values determined in this work can be used for initial process scale modelling to assess the process performance of these adsorbents for DAC, while future work is required to ascertain the controlling diffusion mechanisms, and reaction kinetics, over a wide range of conditions.
期刊介绍:
ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.