Enhancing skin toxicity predictions in breast cancer radiotherapy through integrated CT radiomics, dosiomics, and machine learning models

IF 2.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101360
Weiqiang Ren, Xiaoming Liu
{"title":"Enhancing skin toxicity predictions in breast cancer radiotherapy through integrated CT radiomics, dosiomics, and machine learning models","authors":"Weiqiang Ren,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and test a multidimensional machine learning framework that combines radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features to predict severe skin toxicity in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The goal was to improve prediction accuracy and support personalized treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The study analyzed a retrospective cohort of 789 breast cancer patients. Pre-treatment computed tomography images were used to extract 215 radiomic features, while 78 dosiomic features were derived from radiation dose distributions. Additionally, 22 dosimetric features, such as dose-volume histograms and mean dose, were included. Feature selection was performed using three methods: Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and Analysis of Variance. Seven classifiers were trained and validated through 5-fold cross-validation. These classifiers included k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, Gradient Boosting Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Voting, and Stacking. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret the contributions of individual features to the model predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best predictive performance was achieved by combining radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features. The Stacking Classifier with RFE showed the highest metrics: 96% accuracy, 95% sensitivity, and 97% AUC-ROC. Among the individual feature types, radiomic features performed better than dosiomic and dosimetric features, achieving an AUC-ROC of 93% with RFE and the Voting Classifier. Dosiomic features were more predictive than dosimetric features alone, with an AUC-ROC of 94% using the Stacking Classifier. SHAP analysis highlighted that texture and spatial features were key predictors of skin toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Integrating radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features significantly enhances the prediction of radiation-induced skin toxicity. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning to improve personalized treatment planning. Further validation in larger, multi-center studies is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 101360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S168785072500072X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to develop and test a multidimensional machine learning framework that combines radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features to predict severe skin toxicity in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The goal was to improve prediction accuracy and support personalized treatment planning.

Materials and methods

The study analyzed a retrospective cohort of 789 breast cancer patients. Pre-treatment computed tomography images were used to extract 215 radiomic features, while 78 dosiomic features were derived from radiation dose distributions. Additionally, 22 dosimetric features, such as dose-volume histograms and mean dose, were included. Feature selection was performed using three methods: Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and Analysis of Variance. Seven classifiers were trained and validated through 5-fold cross-validation. These classifiers included k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, Gradient Boosting Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Voting, and Stacking. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret the contributions of individual features to the model predictions.

Results

The best predictive performance was achieved by combining radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features. The Stacking Classifier with RFE showed the highest metrics: 96% accuracy, 95% sensitivity, and 97% AUC-ROC. Among the individual feature types, radiomic features performed better than dosiomic and dosimetric features, achieving an AUC-ROC of 93% with RFE and the Voting Classifier. Dosiomic features were more predictive than dosimetric features alone, with an AUC-ROC of 94% using the Stacking Classifier. SHAP analysis highlighted that texture and spatial features were key predictors of skin toxicity.

Conclusions

Integrating radiomic, dosiomic, and dosimetric features significantly enhances the prediction of radiation-induced skin toxicity. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning to improve personalized treatment planning. Further validation in larger, multi-center studies is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过集成CT放射组学、剂量组学和机器学习模型增强乳腺癌放疗中皮肤毒性预测
本研究旨在开发和测试一种多维机器学习框架,该框架结合了放射学、剂量学和剂量学特征,以预测接受放疗的乳腺癌患者的严重皮肤毒性。目的是提高预测的准确性,支持个性化的治疗计划。材料与方法本研究对789例乳腺癌患者进行回顾性队列分析。使用预处理计算机断层扫描图像提取215个放射组学特征,同时从辐射剂量分布中提取78个剂量组学特征。此外,还包括22个剂量学特征,如剂量-体积直方图和平均剂量。采用递归特征消除(RFE)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子、方差分析三种方法进行特征选择。通过5次交叉验证训练和验证了7个分类器。这些分类器包括k近邻、随机森林、支持向量机、梯度增强机、极端梯度增强、投票和堆叠。通过准确度、灵敏度和受试者工作特征曲线(AUC-ROC)下的面积来评估模型的性能。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析用于解释个体特征对模型预测的贡献。结果结合放射组学、剂量组学和剂量学特征,预测效果最佳。具有RFE的堆叠分类器显示出最高的指标:96%的准确率,95%的灵敏度和97%的AUC-ROC。在单个特征类型中,放射组学特征比剂量组学和剂量学特征表现更好,使用RFE和投票分类器实现了93%的AUC-ROC。剂量学特征比单独的剂量学特征更具预测性,使用堆叠分类器的AUC-ROC为94%。SHAP分析强调纹理和空间特征是皮肤毒性的关键预测因子。结论综合放射组学、剂量组学和剂量学特征可显著提高辐射致皮肤毒性的预测。这些发现突出了机器学习在改善个性化治疗计划方面的潜力。建议在更大的多中心研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Shugananshen recipe improves insomnia in humans and alleviates anxiety in rats by altering expressions of key signaling molecules Knowledge and awareness of ionizing radiation hazards in diagnostic imaging among patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia The role of AKR1C3 in regulating chondrocyte aging in knee osteoarthritis AI-enhanced analytical and numerical solutions for fractional cancer tumor models in older adults using healthcare technologies Danshou Tang alleviates mitochondrial oxidative stress and modulates apoptosis to improve recurrent spontaneous abortion outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1