Is there moral hazard in medical savings accounts? Evidence from Singapore

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106938
Jessica Ya Sun
{"title":"Is there moral hazard in medical savings accounts? Evidence from Singapore","authors":"Jessica Ya Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical savings accounts (MSAs) are designed to provide tax incentives for individuals to save for future healthcare needs, with the goal of reducing overall health expenditures. This paper first examines how individuals adjust their healthcare spending when receiving additional transfers to their MSAs. Using a comprehensive monthly longitudinal survey and a staggered difference-in-differences design, I find that individuals increase their monthly medical expenditure by 13 %, with the marginal propensity to consume from MSAs estimated at 0.6. Second, I analyze the impact of a 25 % price reduction for services at General Practitioner (GP) Clinics and Specialist Outpatient Clinics (SOCs) on healthcare utilization. The results show that MSA holders increase their medication spending by 10.7 % at the extensive margin in response to the price reduction. These findings suggest that both MSA top-ups and price reductions lead to increased healthcare utilization, indicating that MSA holders may respond to these financial incentives by consuming more healthcare in the present, prioritizing immediate healthcare needs over future savings. While this behavior may reflect moral hazard within MSAs, it may also point to unmet healthcare needs that are being addressed through increased liquidity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 106938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical savings accounts (MSAs) are designed to provide tax incentives for individuals to save for future healthcare needs, with the goal of reducing overall health expenditures. This paper first examines how individuals adjust their healthcare spending when receiving additional transfers to their MSAs. Using a comprehensive monthly longitudinal survey and a staggered difference-in-differences design, I find that individuals increase their monthly medical expenditure by 13 %, with the marginal propensity to consume from MSAs estimated at 0.6. Second, I analyze the impact of a 25 % price reduction for services at General Practitioner (GP) Clinics and Specialist Outpatient Clinics (SOCs) on healthcare utilization. The results show that MSA holders increase their medication spending by 10.7 % at the extensive margin in response to the price reduction. These findings suggest that both MSA top-ups and price reductions lead to increased healthcare utilization, indicating that MSA holders may respond to these financial incentives by consuming more healthcare in the present, prioritizing immediate healthcare needs over future savings. While this behavior may reflect moral hazard within MSAs, it may also point to unmet healthcare needs that are being addressed through increased liquidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗储蓄账户存在道德风险吗?来自新加坡的证据
医疗储蓄账户(msa)旨在为个人提供税收优惠,以节省未来的医疗保健需求,目标是减少总体医疗支出。本文首先考察了个人如何调整他们的医疗保健支出时,接受额外的转移到他们的msa。通过综合月度纵向调查和交错差异设计,我发现个人每月的医疗支出增加了13%,边际消费倾向估计为0.6。其次,我分析了全科医生(GP)诊所和专科门诊诊所(soc)服务降价25%对医疗保健利用的影响。结果表明,MSA持有人在广泛边际上增加了10.7%的药物支出,以应对价格下降。这些研究结果表明,MSA充值和降价都会导致医疗保健利用率的增加,这表明MSA持有人可能会对这些财务激励做出反应,在当前消费更多的医疗保健,优先考虑当前的医疗保健需求,而不是未来的储蓄。虽然这种行为可能反映了msa内部的道德风险,但它也可能表明,正在通过增加流动性来解决未得到满足的医疗保健需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Consumer coordination and optimal pricing under network externalities Paternalism after behavioral economics Inflation expectations and cognitive uncertainty Measuring preferences over temporal profiles✰ Saving motives over the life-cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1