A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) assessment of a geothermal-driven polygeneration plant with energy storage using compressed hydrogen

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2025-04-10 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.115796
Fatih Yilmaz
{"title":"A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) assessment of a geothermal-driven polygeneration plant with energy storage using compressed hydrogen","authors":"Fatih Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The developed study conducts comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental investigates of a geothermal-assisted integrated plant producing green compressed hydrogen, power, heating, and freshwater. The present combined plant integrates a supercritical carbon dioxide-based Brayton cycle (sCO<sub>2</sub>-BC), a transcritical carbon dioxide-based Rankine cycle (tCO<sub>2</sub>-RC), a hydrogen production and storage unit, and a desalination process. The primary goal of this configuration is compressed hydrogen storage beyond green power, heating, and freshwater generation. In this paper, extensive thermo-economic and environmental impact study is executed parametrically to examine the plant's efficiency, economic cost, and the rate of emissions saved. Looking at base case results indicates that this plant's efficiencies are computed as energetically 25.84 % and 31.92 % exergetically. The net power, hydrogen, and freshwater capabilities of this integrated model are 1128kW, 0.001693 kgs<sup>−1</sup>, and 1.28 kgs<sup>−1</sup> respectively. Likewise, the entire model cost rate and hydrogen generation cost rate are calculated as 149.1 $h<sup>−1</sup> and 1.479 $kg<sup>−1</sup>. Moreover, regarding environmental impact, about 7174 tons of annual CO<sub>2</sub> emissions have been saved if the beneficial outputs obtained from the 200 <span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup><mi>C</mi></math></span> geothermal sources are to be obtained by using natural gas (methane). The findings of this paper highlight the potential of hydrogen generation with renewable energy-based multigeneration plants in transit to net zero emission aims and can provide the basis for future innovative studies on this subject.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115796"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25005092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The developed study conducts comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental investigates of a geothermal-assisted integrated plant producing green compressed hydrogen, power, heating, and freshwater. The present combined plant integrates a supercritical carbon dioxide-based Brayton cycle (sCO2-BC), a transcritical carbon dioxide-based Rankine cycle (tCO2-RC), a hydrogen production and storage unit, and a desalination process. The primary goal of this configuration is compressed hydrogen storage beyond green power, heating, and freshwater generation. In this paper, extensive thermo-economic and environmental impact study is executed parametrically to examine the plant's efficiency, economic cost, and the rate of emissions saved. Looking at base case results indicates that this plant's efficiencies are computed as energetically 25.84 % and 31.92 % exergetically. The net power, hydrogen, and freshwater capabilities of this integrated model are 1128kW, 0.001693 kgs−1, and 1.28 kgs−1 respectively. Likewise, the entire model cost rate and hydrogen generation cost rate are calculated as 149.1 $h−1 and 1.479 $kg−1. Moreover, regarding environmental impact, about 7174 tons of annual CO2 emissions have been saved if the beneficial outputs obtained from the 200 °C geothermal sources are to be obtained by using natural gas (methane). The findings of this paper highlight the potential of hydrogen generation with renewable energy-based multigeneration plants in transit to net zero emission aims and can provide the basis for future innovative studies on this subject.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对利用压缩氢储能的地热驱动多联产发电厂进行能源、放能、经济和环境(4E)综合评估
开发的研究进行了全面的能源,能源,经济和环境的调查地热辅助集成工厂生产绿色压缩氢,电力,加热和淡水。目前的联合工厂集成了一个超临界二氧化碳基布雷顿循环(sCO2-BC)、一个跨临界二氧化碳基朗肯循环(tCO2-RC)、一个氢气生产和储存单元以及一个海水淡化过程。这种结构的主要目标是压缩氢储存,而不是绿色能源、供暖和淡水发电。在本文中,进行了广泛的热经济和环境影响参数研究,以检查工厂的效率,经济成本和减排率。从基本情况的结果来看,该厂的能源效率分别为25.84%和31.92%。该综合模型的净功率、氢气和淡水容量分别为1128kW、0.001693 kgs−1和1.28 kgs−1。同样,整个模型成本率和制氢成本率分别为149.1 $h−1和1.479 $kg−1。此外,在环境影响方面,如果使用天然气(甲烷)获得200°C地热资源的有益产出,则每年可节省约7174吨二氧化碳排放。本文的研究结果强调了以可再生能源为基础的多电站在实现净零排放目标的过程中制氢的潜力,并可以为未来对这一主题的创新研究提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Interfacial molecular engineering of polymer-in-ceramic composite solid electrolyte for high performance solid-state lithium batteries An Economic Model Predictive Control for energy management in an electric vehicle’s off-grid charging station Interfacial reactions in boron-modified Ni-rich layered cathodes of lithium-ion battery Advances in pumped thermal energy storage: A comprehensive review Unraveling process-level exergy destruction in cold storage packed beds: A new modeling framework for efficiency optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1