Botox injections with and without general anesthesia for pediatric sialorrhea: A cost, efficacy, and safety analysis

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112270
Michael M. Lindeborg, Alyssa M. Civantos, Michelle Florentine, Anna K. Meyer, Kristina W. Rosbe
{"title":"Botox injections with and without general anesthesia for pediatric sialorrhea: A cost, efficacy, and safety analysis","authors":"Michael M. Lindeborg,&nbsp;Alyssa M. Civantos,&nbsp;Michelle Florentine,&nbsp;Anna K. Meyer,&nbsp;Kristina W. Rosbe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ultrasound-guided salivary gland Botulinum toxin A (Botox) injections are often used in pediatric patients with refractory sialorrhea, performed with or without general anesthesia. This study aims to compare outcomes and costs between these methods.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary children's hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with chronic sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections between 2012 and 2023 under general anesthesia (n = 50; 126 injections) were compared to those performed without general anesthesia (n = 31; 116 injections). Sociodemographic factors, clinical history, and injection regimen were recorded. Available billing data from this time period was used to compare costs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pediatric patients who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia did not have statistically significant differences in post-injection cessation of anticholinergic medications (AOR = 0.980, [0.29, 3.29]), family-reported improvement in sialorrhea (AOR = 3.25, [0.58, 18.1]), admissions for aspiration pneumonia within the year (Coefficient = 0.260, [-0.22, 0.75]), or progression to sialorrhea surgery (AOR = 0.374, [0.07, 2.16]) compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Amongst patients who underwent repeat injections, there were no significant differences in the average number of injections (p = 0.41) or time between injections (p = 0.16). Botulinum toxin A injections performed in the outpatient setting ($1374.49) had significantly lower costs compared to injections performed under general anesthesia ($5077.13) (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pediatric patients undergoing Botulinum toxin A injections with and without general anesthesia have similar efficacy and quality outcomes. Exploring the advantages of Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia could lead to improved access, reduced risks of general anesthesia, and reduced costs to the medical system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625000576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound-guided salivary gland Botulinum toxin A (Botox) injections are often used in pediatric patients with refractory sialorrhea, performed with or without general anesthesia. This study aims to compare outcomes and costs between these methods.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary children's hospital.

Methods

Patients with chronic sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections between 2012 and 2023 under general anesthesia (n = 50; 126 injections) were compared to those performed without general anesthesia (n = 31; 116 injections). Sociodemographic factors, clinical history, and injection regimen were recorded. Available billing data from this time period was used to compare costs.

Results

Pediatric patients who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia did not have statistically significant differences in post-injection cessation of anticholinergic medications (AOR = 0.980, [0.29, 3.29]), family-reported improvement in sialorrhea (AOR = 3.25, [0.58, 18.1]), admissions for aspiration pneumonia within the year (Coefficient = 0.260, [-0.22, 0.75]), or progression to sialorrhea surgery (AOR = 0.374, [0.07, 2.16]) compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Amongst patients who underwent repeat injections, there were no significant differences in the average number of injections (p = 0.41) or time between injections (p = 0.16). Botulinum toxin A injections performed in the outpatient setting ($1374.49) had significantly lower costs compared to injections performed under general anesthesia ($5077.13) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Pediatric patients undergoing Botulinum toxin A injections with and without general anesthesia have similar efficacy and quality outcomes. Exploring the advantages of Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia could lead to improved access, reduced risks of general anesthesia, and reduced costs to the medical system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注射肉毒杆菌有和没有全身麻醉的儿童唾液:成本,疗效和安全性分析
目的超声引导下的唾液腺肉毒杆菌毒素A (Botox)注射常用于小儿难治性唾液患者,无论是否进行全身麻醉。本研究旨在比较这些方法的结果和成本。研究设计回顾性队列研究。设置三级儿童医院。方法2012 ~ 2023年在全麻下接受A型肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗的难治性慢性唾液漏患者(n = 50;126例注射)与未全身麻醉的患者进行比较(n = 31;116注射)。记录社会人口因素、临床病史和注射方案。此时间段的可用账单数据用于比较成本。结果接受A型肉毒毒素非全麻注射的儿科患者在注射后停用抗胆碱能药物(AOR = 0.980,[0.29, 3.29])、家庭报告的唾液改善(AOR = 3.25,[0.58, 18.1])、年内吸入性肺炎入院(系数= 0.260,[-0.22,0.75])、进展到唾液手术(AOR = 0.374,[0.07])等方面差异无统计学意义。[2.16])与全身麻醉相比。在重复注射的患者中,平均注射次数(p = 0.41)或注射间隔时间(p = 0.16)无显著差异。在门诊注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素(1374.49美元)的费用明显低于全麻注射(5077.13美元)(p <;0.001)。结论小儿在全麻和非全麻情况下注射A型肉毒毒素的疗效和质量结果相似。探索无需全身麻醉的A型肉毒杆菌毒素注射的优势可以改善获取途径,降低全身麻醉的风险,并降低医疗系统的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary management of acute mastoiditis in children: Insights from a U.S. national database Post-operative results after tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades in underlay technique in children Paediatric airway inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a decade of lessons from a quaternary centre Hearing screening status and influencing factors of hearing loss in critically ill neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis The increasing incidence and features of grill brush wire bristle injuries in the United States: 2015-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1