Applying fuzzy logic cognitive modeling to integrate socio-ecological knowledge for carnivore conflict management

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111019
Vasavi Prakash, Robert A. Gitzen, Christopher A. Lepczyk
{"title":"Applying fuzzy logic cognitive modeling to integrate socio-ecological knowledge for carnivore conflict management","authors":"Vasavi Prakash,&nbsp;Robert A. Gitzen,&nbsp;Christopher A. Lepczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-carnivore conflict (HCC) is a growing global problem. A fundamental challenge is that HCC almost universally involves human-human conflict. Residents affected by HCC may also lack power and money to implement solutions, while conservation practitioners with power to guide solutions prioritize species conservation. Given the need to holistically evaluate HCC, we used a social-ecological systems (SES) approach that incorporated theoretical frameworks to draw out the hidden aspects of HCC. Specifically, we used a participatory fuzzy logic cognitive modeling approach to create mental models as a SES tool to study HCC. The theoretical lens of systems thinking encompassing conflict theory and power sharing were used to test hypotheses and to compare models between conservation experts and residents. We used human-tiger conflict (HTC) in India as a model system given the country's success at tiger conservation and the complex human dimensions involved. We conducted focused group discussions in 16 villages around Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, and with 10 experts, to create 26 mental models. We identified 445 qualitative variables that were aggregated across 6 themes. The mean complexity scores were similar between residents and experts, demonstrating similarities in understanding the complexity of HTCs for both groups. Based on conflict theory, important factors identified by residents included fencing, early warning systems, and awareness measures. In contrast, important factors identified by experts were pollution, climate change, and habitat quality. Based on power asymmetry, these two groups identified different drivers and mitigation solutions, with residents prioritizing fuelwood collection and fencing, while experts prioritized habitat quality and prey base availability. These results are valuable for identifying the unaddressed needs of actors involved. Our findings can aid in policy to promote local support of conservation initiatives for wild species conservation by integrating local ecological knowledge and fulfilling the needs of the local people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 111019"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-carnivore conflict (HCC) is a growing global problem. A fundamental challenge is that HCC almost universally involves human-human conflict. Residents affected by HCC may also lack power and money to implement solutions, while conservation practitioners with power to guide solutions prioritize species conservation. Given the need to holistically evaluate HCC, we used a social-ecological systems (SES) approach that incorporated theoretical frameworks to draw out the hidden aspects of HCC. Specifically, we used a participatory fuzzy logic cognitive modeling approach to create mental models as a SES tool to study HCC. The theoretical lens of systems thinking encompassing conflict theory and power sharing were used to test hypotheses and to compare models between conservation experts and residents. We used human-tiger conflict (HTC) in India as a model system given the country's success at tiger conservation and the complex human dimensions involved. We conducted focused group discussions in 16 villages around Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, and with 10 experts, to create 26 mental models. We identified 445 qualitative variables that were aggregated across 6 themes. The mean complexity scores were similar between residents and experts, demonstrating similarities in understanding the complexity of HTCs for both groups. Based on conflict theory, important factors identified by residents included fencing, early warning systems, and awareness measures. In contrast, important factors identified by experts were pollution, climate change, and habitat quality. Based on power asymmetry, these two groups identified different drivers and mitigation solutions, with residents prioritizing fuelwood collection and fencing, while experts prioritized habitat quality and prey base availability. These results are valuable for identifying the unaddressed needs of actors involved. Our findings can aid in policy to promote local support of conservation initiatives for wild species conservation by integrating local ecological knowledge and fulfilling the needs of the local people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of endangered shark trophies in automated detection of the online wildlife trade Jaguar (Panthera onca) density and population size across protected areas and indigenous lands in the Amazon biome, its largest stronghold Bias in neotropical and reef biodiversity monitoring programs may prevent detecting changes in species diversity through time Threatened fauna that use blue carbon ecosystems: A review from Australia The hidden dimension of poaching: A novel survey method shows that local demand for pets largely outnumbers domestic and international trade of neotropical parrots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1