Applying fuzzy logic cognitive modeling to integrate socio-ecological knowledge for carnivore conflict management

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111019
Vasavi Prakash, Robert A. Gitzen, Christopher A. Lepczyk
{"title":"Applying fuzzy logic cognitive modeling to integrate socio-ecological knowledge for carnivore conflict management","authors":"Vasavi Prakash,&nbsp;Robert A. Gitzen,&nbsp;Christopher A. Lepczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-carnivore conflict (HCC) is a growing global problem. A fundamental challenge is that HCC almost universally involves human-human conflict. Residents affected by HCC may also lack power and money to implement solutions, while conservation practitioners with power to guide solutions prioritize species conservation. Given the need to holistically evaluate HCC, we used a social-ecological systems (SES) approach that incorporated theoretical frameworks to draw out the hidden aspects of HCC. Specifically, we used a participatory fuzzy logic cognitive modeling approach to create mental models as a SES tool to study HCC. The theoretical lens of systems thinking encompassing conflict theory and power sharing were used to test hypotheses and to compare models between conservation experts and residents. We used human-tiger conflict (HTC) in India as a model system given the country's success at tiger conservation and the complex human dimensions involved. We conducted focused group discussions in 16 villages around Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, and with 10 experts, to create 26 mental models. We identified 445 qualitative variables that were aggregated across 6 themes. The mean complexity scores were similar between residents and experts, demonstrating similarities in understanding the complexity of HTCs for both groups. Based on conflict theory, important factors identified by residents included fencing, early warning systems, and awareness measures. In contrast, important factors identified by experts were pollution, climate change, and habitat quality. Based on power asymmetry, these two groups identified different drivers and mitigation solutions, with residents prioritizing fuelwood collection and fencing, while experts prioritized habitat quality and prey base availability. These results are valuable for identifying the unaddressed needs of actors involved. Our findings can aid in policy to promote local support of conservation initiatives for wild species conservation by integrating local ecological knowledge and fulfilling the needs of the local people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 111019"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-carnivore conflict (HCC) is a growing global problem. A fundamental challenge is that HCC almost universally involves human-human conflict. Residents affected by HCC may also lack power and money to implement solutions, while conservation practitioners with power to guide solutions prioritize species conservation. Given the need to holistically evaluate HCC, we used a social-ecological systems (SES) approach that incorporated theoretical frameworks to draw out the hidden aspects of HCC. Specifically, we used a participatory fuzzy logic cognitive modeling approach to create mental models as a SES tool to study HCC. The theoretical lens of systems thinking encompassing conflict theory and power sharing were used to test hypotheses and to compare models between conservation experts and residents. We used human-tiger conflict (HTC) in India as a model system given the country's success at tiger conservation and the complex human dimensions involved. We conducted focused group discussions in 16 villages around Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, and with 10 experts, to create 26 mental models. We identified 445 qualitative variables that were aggregated across 6 themes. The mean complexity scores were similar between residents and experts, demonstrating similarities in understanding the complexity of HTCs for both groups. Based on conflict theory, important factors identified by residents included fencing, early warning systems, and awareness measures. In contrast, important factors identified by experts were pollution, climate change, and habitat quality. Based on power asymmetry, these two groups identified different drivers and mitigation solutions, with residents prioritizing fuelwood collection and fencing, while experts prioritized habitat quality and prey base availability. These results are valuable for identifying the unaddressed needs of actors involved. Our findings can aid in policy to promote local support of conservation initiatives for wild species conservation by integrating local ecological knowledge and fulfilling the needs of the local people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用模糊逻辑认知模型整合社会生态知识,进行食肉动物冲突管理
人肉冲突(HCC)是一个日益严重的全球性问题。一个根本的挑战是HCC几乎普遍涉及人与人之间的冲突。受HCC影响的居民也可能缺乏实施解决方案的权力和资金,而有权力指导解决方案的保护从业者则优先考虑物种保护。考虑到需要对HCC进行整体评估,我们使用了社会生态系统(SES)方法,该方法结合了理论框架来绘制HCC的隐藏方面。具体而言,我们使用参与式模糊逻辑认知建模方法来创建心理模型,作为研究HCC的SES工具。系统思维的理论视角包括冲突理论和权力分享,用于检验假设,并比较保护专家和居民之间的模型。鉴于印度在老虎保护方面取得的成功以及涉及的复杂的人类因素,我们将印度的人虎冲突(HTC)作为一个模型系统。我们在Pilibhit老虎保护区周围的16个村庄进行了重点小组讨论,并与10位专家一起创建了26个心理模型。我们确定了445个定性变量,这些变量集中在6个主题中。居民和专家的平均复杂性得分相似,表明两组对htc复杂性的理解相似。基于冲突理论,居民确定的重要因素包括围栏、预警系统和意识措施。相比之下,专家们确定的重要因素是污染、气候变化和栖息地质量。基于权力不对称,这两个小组确定了不同的驱动因素和缓解解决方案,居民优先考虑薪材收集和围栏,而专家优先考虑栖息地质量和猎物基地的可用性。这些结果对于确定所涉行为者未解决的需求是有价值的。我们的研究结果可以通过整合当地生态知识和满足当地人民的需求来促进当地对野生物种保护倡议的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Beyond species richness: Habitat fragmentation reduces community occupancy and functional richness of mountain forest mammals Global forests risk to climate and land-use change Introduced species are a global threat to lizard biodiversity Raising practitioner awareness to improve conservation of Data Deficient species: Evidence from before-and-after interviews CITES compliance gaps: Illegal international trade of fins from Western Pacific–Indian Ocean increasingly sustain pelagic thresher sharks in major global market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1