Roux limb revision for recalcitrant bile reflux after total gastrectomy

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109214
Amber F. Gallanis MD , Cassidy Bowden BS , Disha Sharma MD , Gracia Viana Rodriguez MD , Rachael Lopez MPH, RD , Charlotte Payne PA-C , Stacy Joyce PA-C , Riema Broesamle RN , Andrew M. Blakely MD , Jonathan M. Hernandez MD , Louis Korman MD , Theo Heller MD , Jeremy L. Davis MD, FACS
{"title":"Roux limb revision for recalcitrant bile reflux after total gastrectomy","authors":"Amber F. Gallanis MD ,&nbsp;Cassidy Bowden BS ,&nbsp;Disha Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Gracia Viana Rodriguez MD ,&nbsp;Rachael Lopez MPH, RD ,&nbsp;Charlotte Payne PA-C ,&nbsp;Stacy Joyce PA-C ,&nbsp;Riema Broesamle RN ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Blakely MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Hernandez MD ,&nbsp;Louis Korman MD ,&nbsp;Theo Heller MD ,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Davis MD, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Bile reflux is a postgastrectomy syndrome that impacts quality of life. Management includes lifestyle modifications and medical therapy; however, the efficacy of operative intervention for refractory bile reflux is unknown. We aimed to characterize outcomes of Roux limb lengthening for management of recalcitrant bile reflux after total gastrectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective analysis of 159 individuals with germline <em>CDH1</em> mutations who underwent prophylactic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Patient demographics, frequency of recalcitrant bile reflux, type of medical management, operative details, and clinical outcomes were measured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen (8.8%, 14/159) individuals developed bile reflux recalcitrant to medical therapy after prophylactic total gastrectomy and elected for operative Roux limb lengthening of 20–25 cm. Median time from prophylactic total gastrectomy to Roux limb revision was 2.6 years (interquartile range, 2.1–2.9). After revisional surgery, all patients self-reported improvement in bile reflux symptoms. Post-Roux limb revision, almost all (86%, 12/14) patients reported rare or no bile reflux symptoms. Bile reflux severity scores improved to no symptoms in 3 patients (21%), followed by mild (50%, 7/14) or moderate (29%, 4/14) symptoms after Roux limb revision. All individuals (100%, 14/14) who underwent Roux limb revision reported “major improvement” in bile reflux symptoms with a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range, 7.5–21.5). Most patients regained weight post-Roux limb revision (+3.3 kg, standard deviation 4.7, <em>P</em> = .02) with a mean percentage weight gain of 5.9% (standard deviation, 7.4). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications with revisional surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Roux limb revision is effective for management of recalcitrant bile reflux. Additional study to identify potential risk factors for bile reflux after total gastrectomy is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 109214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025000662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bile reflux is a postgastrectomy syndrome that impacts quality of life. Management includes lifestyle modifications and medical therapy; however, the efficacy of operative intervention for refractory bile reflux is unknown. We aimed to characterize outcomes of Roux limb lengthening for management of recalcitrant bile reflux after total gastrectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 159 individuals with germline CDH1 mutations who underwent prophylactic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Patient demographics, frequency of recalcitrant bile reflux, type of medical management, operative details, and clinical outcomes were measured.

Results

Fourteen (8.8%, 14/159) individuals developed bile reflux recalcitrant to medical therapy after prophylactic total gastrectomy and elected for operative Roux limb lengthening of 20–25 cm. Median time from prophylactic total gastrectomy to Roux limb revision was 2.6 years (interquartile range, 2.1–2.9). After revisional surgery, all patients self-reported improvement in bile reflux symptoms. Post-Roux limb revision, almost all (86%, 12/14) patients reported rare or no bile reflux symptoms. Bile reflux severity scores improved to no symptoms in 3 patients (21%), followed by mild (50%, 7/14) or moderate (29%, 4/14) symptoms after Roux limb revision. All individuals (100%, 14/14) who underwent Roux limb revision reported “major improvement” in bile reflux symptoms with a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range, 7.5–21.5). Most patients regained weight post-Roux limb revision (+3.3 kg, standard deviation 4.7, P = .02) with a mean percentage weight gain of 5.9% (standard deviation, 7.4). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications with revisional surgery.

Conclusion

Roux limb revision is effective for management of recalcitrant bile reflux. Additional study to identify potential risk factors for bile reflux after total gastrectomy is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roux肢体翻修术治疗全胃切除术后顽固性胆汁反流
胃反流是一种影响生活质量的胃切除术后综合征。管理包括改变生活方式和药物治疗;然而,手术干预对难治性胆汁反流的疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是描述Roux肢体延长治疗全胃切除术后顽固性胆汁反流的结果。方法回顾性分析159例生殖系CDH1基因突变患者行预防性全胃切除术并Roux-en-Y重建的临床资料。测量了患者人口统计学、顽固性胆汁反流的频率、医疗管理类型、手术细节和临床结果。结果14例(8.8%,14/159)患者在预防性全胃切除术后出现胆汁反流,药物治疗无效,选择行Roux肢体延长20 ~ 25cm手术。从预防性全胃切除术到Roux肢体翻修的中位时间为2.6年(四分位数范围为2.1-2.9)。翻修手术后,所有患者自我报告胆汁反流症状改善。roux肢体翻修后,几乎所有(86%,12/14)患者报告很少或没有胆汁反流症状。3例患者(21%)胆汁反流严重程度评分改善至无症状,随后Roux肢体翻修后出现轻度(50%,7/14)或中度(29%,4/14)症状。所有接受Roux肢体翻修的个体(100%,14/14)在中位随访16个月(四分位数范围,7.5-21.5)后报告胆汁反流症状“显著改善”。大多数患者roux肢体修复后体重恢复(+3.3 kg,标准差4.7,P = 0.02),平均体重增加百分比为5.9%(标准差,7.4)。翻修手术无术中及术后并发症。结论roux肢体翻修术是治疗顽固性胆汁反流的有效方法。进一步研究确定全胃切除术后胆汁反流的潜在危险因素是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for early prediction of splenic infarction after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study Withdrawal of life support following interfacility transfer in older adults with traumatic brain injury Metabolic dysfunction–Associated fatty liver disease impairs intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography quality: Development and validation of a predictive model Collaborative model between breast surgery and genetic counseling reduces wait times and increases pretesting genetic counseling volume Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus open Lichtenstein primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1