Groundwater storage loss in the central valley analysis using a novel method based on in situ data compared to GRACE-derived data

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Environmental Modelling & Software Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106368
Michael D. Stevens , Saul G. Ramirez , Eva-Marie H. Martin , Norman L. Jones , Gustavious P. Williams , Kyra H. Adams , Daniel P. Ames , Sarva T. Pulla
{"title":"Groundwater storage loss in the central valley analysis using a novel method based on in situ data compared to GRACE-derived data","authors":"Michael D. Stevens ,&nbsp;Saul G. Ramirez ,&nbsp;Eva-Marie H. Martin ,&nbsp;Norman L. Jones ,&nbsp;Gustavious P. Williams ,&nbsp;Kyra H. Adams ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Ames ,&nbsp;Sarva T. Pulla","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We estimate long-term groundwater storage loss in California's Central Valley (CV) using a novel data imputation method that combines <em>in situ</em> data with Earth Observations to generate temporally and spatially interpolated groundwater elevations. We combine these data with storage coefficient maps to produce time series of groundwater volume changes which compare well with previously published groundwater storage change estimates for the valley. We also compare our results to groundwater storage changes we calculated using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission data and show that the two storage estimates are well correlated, but the GRACE volume estimates are lower due the well-known “leakage” effect. While other researchers have accounted for leakage by scaling the GRACE results using various factors and assumptions, our method demonstrates a direct method for calibrating GRACE estimated groundwater change, which can then be applied to future GRACE results in the CV with confidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106368"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225000520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate long-term groundwater storage loss in California's Central Valley (CV) using a novel data imputation method that combines in situ data with Earth Observations to generate temporally and spatially interpolated groundwater elevations. We combine these data with storage coefficient maps to produce time series of groundwater volume changes which compare well with previously published groundwater storage change estimates for the valley. We also compare our results to groundwater storage changes we calculated using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission data and show that the two storage estimates are well correlated, but the GRACE volume estimates are lower due the well-known “leakage” effect. While other researchers have accounted for leakage by scaling the GRACE results using various factors and assumptions, our method demonstrates a direct method for calibrating GRACE estimated groundwater change, which can then be applied to future GRACE results in the CV with confidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用一种基于原位数据与grace数据相比较的新方法分析中央谷地地下水储存损失
本文采用一种新颖的数据代入方法,将现场数据与地球观测数据相结合,生成时间和空间内插的地下水高度,估算了加州中央山谷(CV)地下水的长期储存损失。我们将这些数据与储存系数图结合起来,得出地下水体积变化的时间序列,与之前公布的山谷地下水储存变化估计值进行了很好的比较。我们还将我们的结果与使用重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)任务数据计算的地下水储存量变化进行了比较,结果表明,这两个储存量估算值具有良好的相关性,但由于众所周知的“泄漏”效应,GRACE体积估算值较低。虽然其他研究人员通过使用各种因素和假设缩放GRACE结果来解释泄漏,但我们的方法展示了一种校准GRACE估计地下水变化的直接方法,然后可以放心地将其应用于CV中的未来GRACE结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
期刊最新文献
Transparent and reproducible crop model calibration using exclusively public data: Improving phenology and yield predictions in APSIMx Emulating the Global Change Analysis Model with deep learning: An energy sector case study RiverSTICH: Sewing together 3D rivers from only a few loose threads of transect data Dynamic integration of water quality simulation into Pywr Converging human intelligence with AI systems to advance flood evacuation decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1