BFRP bars reinforced geopolymer-based coral aggregate concrete beams with sustainable and high seawater erosion resistance: Flexural durability, economic, and ecological analysis

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119910
Bai Zhang , Hong Zhu , Zhiyuan Yang , Yao-Rong Dong
{"title":"BFRP bars reinforced geopolymer-based coral aggregate concrete beams with sustainable and high seawater erosion resistance: Flexural durability, economic, and ecological analysis","authors":"Bai Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Yao-Rong Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cement-based coral aggregate concrete (CAC) and its structures suffer from high carbon emissions, poor resistance to permeation, and inadequate durability under hygrothermal marine environments. To overcome these drawbacks, this study employed slag-fly ash-based geopolymers as alternatives to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars as reinforcements for developing innovative BFRP bars reinforced geopolymer-based CAC (GPCAC) beams. Through the accelerated aging method in laboratory, the flexural durability and deterioration mechanism of cement-based CAC beams and GPCAC beams under seawater wet-dry cycling conditions were comparatively analyzed. The results revealed that the number of cracks in GPCAC and CAC beams at the time of damage decreased, while the crack spacing and width increased after exposure to seawater corrosive environments. Additionally, an increase in the initial flexural stiffness of both GPCAC and CAC beams was observed after exposure to seawater wet-dry cyclic environments, but this increased stiffness did not translate into an enhanced ultimate loading capacity. Conversely, both GPCAC and CAC beams showed varying degrees of degradation in ultimate loading capacity and deflection values with increasing exposure time and temperatures. Moreover, GPCAC beams featured outstanding resistance to seawater attacks than CAC beams. After 12 months of seawater wetting-drying cycles at 60 °C, the flexural capacity of CAC beams deteriorated by approximately 25 %, whereas that of GPCAC beams only diminished by approximately 16 %. Furthermore, GPCAC beams boasted a lower carbon footprint and energy emission than CAC beams. In comparison to cement-based CAC beams, the energy consumptions and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of GPCAC beams were reduced by 21.9 % and 35.0 %, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 119910"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625003001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cement-based coral aggregate concrete (CAC) and its structures suffer from high carbon emissions, poor resistance to permeation, and inadequate durability under hygrothermal marine environments. To overcome these drawbacks, this study employed slag-fly ash-based geopolymers as alternatives to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars as reinforcements for developing innovative BFRP bars reinforced geopolymer-based CAC (GPCAC) beams. Through the accelerated aging method in laboratory, the flexural durability and deterioration mechanism of cement-based CAC beams and GPCAC beams under seawater wet-dry cycling conditions were comparatively analyzed. The results revealed that the number of cracks in GPCAC and CAC beams at the time of damage decreased, while the crack spacing and width increased after exposure to seawater corrosive environments. Additionally, an increase in the initial flexural stiffness of both GPCAC and CAC beams was observed after exposure to seawater wet-dry cyclic environments, but this increased stiffness did not translate into an enhanced ultimate loading capacity. Conversely, both GPCAC and CAC beams showed varying degrees of degradation in ultimate loading capacity and deflection values with increasing exposure time and temperatures. Moreover, GPCAC beams featured outstanding resistance to seawater attacks than CAC beams. After 12 months of seawater wetting-drying cycles at 60 °C, the flexural capacity of CAC beams deteriorated by approximately 25 %, whereas that of GPCAC beams only diminished by approximately 16 %. Furthermore, GPCAC beams boasted a lower carbon footprint and energy emission than CAC beams. In comparison to cement-based CAC beams, the energy consumptions and CO2 emissions of GPCAC beams were reduced by 21.9 % and 35.0 %, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BFRP筋增强地聚合物基珊瑚骨料混凝土梁具有可持续和高耐海水侵蚀:抗弯耐久性,经济性和生态分析
水泥基珊瑚骨料混凝土(CAC)及其结构在海洋湿热环境下存在碳排放高、抗渗透能力差、耐久性不足等问题。为了克服这些缺点,本研究采用矿渣粉煤灰基地聚合物作为普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)筋的替代品,开发创新型BFRP筋增强地聚合物基CAC (GPCAC)梁。通过室内加速老化方法,对比分析了水泥基CAC梁和GPCAC梁在海水干湿循环条件下的抗弯耐久性及劣化机理。结果表明:受海水腐蚀环境影响,GPCAC和CAC梁损伤时裂缝数量减少,裂缝间距和宽度增大;此外,暴露于海水干湿循环环境后,GPCAC和CAC梁的初始抗弯刚度均有所增加,但这种增加的刚度并未转化为极限承载能力的增强。相反,随着暴露时间和温度的增加,GPCAC和CAC梁的极限承载能力和挠度值都出现了不同程度的退化。GPCAC梁比CAC梁具有更强的抗海水侵蚀能力。在60°C海水干湿循环12个月后,CAC梁的抗弯能力下降了约25% %,而GPCAC梁的抗弯能力仅下降了约16% %。此外,GPCAC梁具有比CAC梁更低的碳足迹和能量排放。与水泥基CAC梁相比,GPCAC梁的能耗和CO2排放量分别降低21.9% %和35.0% %。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
A theoretical model for circular concrete filled steel tubes under compression considering the effect of stress path Spaceborne-InSAR monitoring framework for large-span spatial structures based on temperature-based structural identification theory A UAV-deployable lightweight framework for real-time bridge crack detection via YOLO-LY algorithm Seismic damage and time-dependent fragility assessment of non-uniformly corroded bridges subjected to short- and long-duration earthquakes Corrosion-fatigue life prediction of high-strength steel wires based on reconstructed critical distance theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1