Hybrid discrete and finite element analysis enables fast evaluation of hip joint cartilage mechanical response

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112568
Mikko S. Venäläinen , Mao Li , Juha Töyräs , Rami K. Korhonen , Jurgen Fripp , Stuart Crozier , Shekhar S. Chandra , Craig Engstrom
{"title":"Hybrid discrete and finite element analysis enables fast evaluation of hip joint cartilage mechanical response","authors":"Mikko S. Venäläinen ,&nbsp;Mao Li ,&nbsp;Juha Töyräs ,&nbsp;Rami K. Korhonen ,&nbsp;Jurgen Fripp ,&nbsp;Stuart Crozier ,&nbsp;Shekhar S. Chandra ,&nbsp;Craig Engstrom","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Finite element analysis (FEA) is the leading numerical technique for studying joint biomechanics related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. However, subject-specific FEA of joint mechanics is a time- and compute-intensive process limiting its clinical applicability. We introduce and evaluate a novel hybrid modelling framework combining discrete element analysis (DEA) and FEA for computationally efficient evaluation of cartilage mechanics in the hip joint. In our approach, the hip joint contact mechanics are first estimated using DEA and subsequently used as input for matching FEA models, substantially reducing model complexity. The cartilage mechanical responses obtained using the hybrid DEA-FEA method were evaluated for subject-specific hip joint geometries from five asymptomatic individuals under loading conditions typical to normal walking gait and compared to conventional FEA in terms of peak intra-tissue mechanical stresses and model run-times. The hybrid DEA-FEA method had a median run-time of 3.6 min per subject (64-core processor, 512 GB RAM) and produced minimum principal (compressive) stress estimates comparable to stresses obtained using conventional FEA models with a median run-time of 96.2 min. On average, the peak compressive stresses obtained using the hybrid DEA-FEA approach were 0.06 MPa (95 % confidence interval: −0.86–0.99) lower than the stresses estimated with conventional FEA. Despite up to 1.4 MPa differences at individual gait time-points, the results indicate that the proposed hybrid DEA-FEA method enables estimation of hip cartilage mechanics in a fraction of time compared to conventional FEA, facilitating implementation in large cohort studies and clinical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 112568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500079X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is the leading numerical technique for studying joint biomechanics related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. However, subject-specific FEA of joint mechanics is a time- and compute-intensive process limiting its clinical applicability. We introduce and evaluate a novel hybrid modelling framework combining discrete element analysis (DEA) and FEA for computationally efficient evaluation of cartilage mechanics in the hip joint. In our approach, the hip joint contact mechanics are first estimated using DEA and subsequently used as input for matching FEA models, substantially reducing model complexity. The cartilage mechanical responses obtained using the hybrid DEA-FEA method were evaluated for subject-specific hip joint geometries from five asymptomatic individuals under loading conditions typical to normal walking gait and compared to conventional FEA in terms of peak intra-tissue mechanical stresses and model run-times. The hybrid DEA-FEA method had a median run-time of 3.6 min per subject (64-core processor, 512 GB RAM) and produced minimum principal (compressive) stress estimates comparable to stresses obtained using conventional FEA models with a median run-time of 96.2 min. On average, the peak compressive stresses obtained using the hybrid DEA-FEA approach were 0.06 MPa (95 % confidence interval: −0.86–0.99) lower than the stresses estimated with conventional FEA. Despite up to 1.4 MPa differences at individual gait time-points, the results indicate that the proposed hybrid DEA-FEA method enables estimation of hip cartilage mechanics in a fraction of time compared to conventional FEA, facilitating implementation in large cohort studies and clinical applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合离散和有限元分析能够快速评估髋关节软骨力学响应
有限元分析(FEA)是研究与骨关节炎发生和发展有关的关节生物力学的主要数值技术。然而,关节力学的特定主题有限元分析是一个时间和计算密集型的过程,限制了其临床适用性。我们介绍并评估了一种结合离散元分析(DEA)和有限元分析的新型混合建模框架,用于计算有效地评估髋关节软骨力学。在我们的方法中,首先使用DEA估计髋关节接触力学,然后将其用作匹配FEA模型的输入,从而大大降低了模型的复杂性。使用混合DEA-FEA方法对5名无症状个体在典型到正常步行步态的加载条件下的特定髋关节几何形状进行了评估,并在峰值组织内机械应力和模型运行时间方面与传统FEA进行了比较。混合DEA-FEA方法的平均运行时间为3.6分钟(64核处理器,512 GB RAM),并且产生的最小主(压)应力估计与使用传统有限元模型的平均运行时间为96.2分钟相当。平均而言,使用混合DEA-FEA方法获得的峰值压应力比传统有限元估计的应力低0.06 MPa(95%置信区间:−0.86-0.99)。尽管个体步态时间点的差异高达1.4 MPa,但结果表明,与传统的有限元分析相比,所提出的混合DEA-FEA方法可以在很短的时间内估计髋关节软骨力学,便于在大型队列研究和临床应用中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Numerical modelling of airflow and aerosol particle delivery in cats with bronchial and non-bronchial disease Kinetics of the trunk in association with the attenuation of upper body acceleration during walking Spatiotemporal mapping of plantar shear forces during human walking using a flexible thin-film sensor Simultaneous stabilizing feedback control of linear and angular momentum in human walking Joint angle and muscle length manipulation reveal regional uniformity of sarcomere lengths in the passive rat medial gastrocnemius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1