More effort with less pay: On information avoidance, optimistic beliefs, and performance

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Economic Review Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.104965
Steffen Huck , Nora Szech , Lukas M. Wenner
{"title":"More effort with less pay: On information avoidance, optimistic beliefs, and performance","authors":"Steffen Huck ,&nbsp;Nora Szech ,&nbsp;Lukas M. Wenner","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.104965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neoclassical theory presumes that agents value instrumental information. In contrast, recent behavioral studies motivate and model information avoidance. We study preferences for and against instrumental information in a real-effort task varying information structures on performance pay. Our study offers three main results. First, we confirm that both, preferences for and against instrumental information, exist. Second, information avoiders outperform information receivers. This result holds independently of effects of self-selection. Third, our findings about information avoiders can be aligned with behavioral theories of optimistic belief design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 104965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoclassical theory presumes that agents value instrumental information. In contrast, recent behavioral studies motivate and model information avoidance. We study preferences for and against instrumental information in a real-effort task varying information structures on performance pay. Our study offers three main results. First, we confirm that both, preferences for and against instrumental information, exist. Second, information avoiders outperform information receivers. This result holds independently of effects of self-selection. Third, our findings about information avoiders can be aligned with behavioral theories of optimistic belief design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
付出更少的努力:关于信息回避、乐观信念和绩效
新古典主义理论假定代理人重视工具性信息。相比之下,最近的行为研究激发并模拟了信息回避。我们研究了在实际工作任务中对工具信息的偏好和对工具信息的偏好,这些信息结构与绩效薪酬有关。我们的研究提供了三个主要结果。首先,我们确认对工具信息的偏好和对工具信息的偏好都存在。其次,信息回避者的表现优于信息接受者。这一结果独立于自我选择的影响。第三,信息回避者的研究结果与乐观信念设计的行为理论是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Quasi-fiscal policies in times of crisis: A high-frequency data analysis The kindness of strangers: Theory and evidence on spatial distance and giving Corruption, trade liberalization and firm productivity: Evidence from Vietnam Infrastructure and global value chain position: Evidence from China Acquisitions, inventors’ turnover, and innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1