Renal Mass Biopsy Prior to Surgical Excision: Practice, Diagnostic Performance, and Impact on Management in the UroCCR Registry (Ancillary Study No. 118)

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.016
Pauline Proye , Bastien Gondran-Tellier , Floriane Michel , Karim Bensalah , Pierre Bigot , François Audenet , Cécile Champy , Pierre Merlin , Franck Bruyere , Morgan Roupret , Gautier Marcq , Louis Surlemont , Bastien Parier , Thibaut Waeckel , Constance Michel , Nicolas Branger , Thibault Tricart , Clément Sarrazin , Jean-Jacques Patard , Maxime Vallée , Romain Boissier
{"title":"Renal Mass Biopsy Prior to Surgical Excision: Practice, Diagnostic Performance, and Impact on Management in the UroCCR Registry (Ancillary Study No. 118)","authors":"Pauline Proye ,&nbsp;Bastien Gondran-Tellier ,&nbsp;Floriane Michel ,&nbsp;Karim Bensalah ,&nbsp;Pierre Bigot ,&nbsp;François Audenet ,&nbsp;Cécile Champy ,&nbsp;Pierre Merlin ,&nbsp;Franck Bruyere ,&nbsp;Morgan Roupret ,&nbsp;Gautier Marcq ,&nbsp;Louis Surlemont ,&nbsp;Bastien Parier ,&nbsp;Thibaut Waeckel ,&nbsp;Constance Michel ,&nbsp;Nicolas Branger ,&nbsp;Thibault Tricart ,&nbsp;Clément Sarrazin ,&nbsp;Jean-Jacques Patard ,&nbsp;Maxime Vallée ,&nbsp;Romain Boissier","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>A renal mass biopsy (RMB) is not systematically recommended before surgical excision of a renal mass, although it has demonstrated elevated accuracy in determining renal masses with low morbidity. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an RMB, the clinical and tumoral factors associated with RMB practice, and the impact of an RMB on renal cell carcinoma management in a contemporary prospective national registry—UroCCR (2010–2021).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified all patients with a single renal mass (pT1–4 N0–2 M0 or benign) who were treated surgically and stratified them according to the performance of a prior RMB. Patients treated by active surveillance, percutaneous ablative treatment, or stereotaxic radiotherapy were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of an RMB was determined in the RMB group. Clinical and tumoral factors associated with the practice of RMBs were analyzed using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In total, 9283 patients were included, who presented 1594 tumors (17%) with a prior RMB. RMBs were 92.4% contributive. The correlation between an RMB and excision in the determination of benign/malignant disease, histological subtype, and grade are, respectively, 96.9%, 86.4%, and 52.6%. The impact of an RMB versus no prior RMB was determined according to the rate of surgical excision for benign lesion and the rate of partial nephrectomy (63.9% vs 57.8%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>An RMB is performed rarely when its diagnostic performance is high. A prior RMB significantly changes the management of localized renal masses, with fewer surgical procedures for benign renal masses and conservative treatment in a higher proportion of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In a large and contemporary registry, we demonstrated that a renal mass biopsy has excellent diagnostic accuracy, significantly reduces renal surgery for benign masses and low-grade/stage renal cell carcinoma, and increases conservative surgical excision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

A renal mass biopsy (RMB) is not systematically recommended before surgical excision of a renal mass, although it has demonstrated elevated accuracy in determining renal masses with low morbidity. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an RMB, the clinical and tumoral factors associated with RMB practice, and the impact of an RMB on renal cell carcinoma management in a contemporary prospective national registry—UroCCR (2010–2021).

Methods

We identified all patients with a single renal mass (pT1–4 N0–2 M0 or benign) who were treated surgically and stratified them according to the performance of a prior RMB. Patients treated by active surveillance, percutaneous ablative treatment, or stereotaxic radiotherapy were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of an RMB was determined in the RMB group. Clinical and tumoral factors associated with the practice of RMBs were analyzed using logistic regression.

Key findings and limitations

In total, 9283 patients were included, who presented 1594 tumors (17%) with a prior RMB. RMBs were 92.4% contributive. The correlation between an RMB and excision in the determination of benign/malignant disease, histological subtype, and grade are, respectively, 96.9%, 86.4%, and 52.6%. The impact of an RMB versus no prior RMB was determined according to the rate of surgical excision for benign lesion and the rate of partial nephrectomy (63.9% vs 57.8%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical implications

An RMB is performed rarely when its diagnostic performance is high. A prior RMB significantly changes the management of localized renal masses, with fewer surgical procedures for benign renal masses and conservative treatment in a higher proportion of patients.

Patient summary

In a large and contemporary registry, we demonstrated that a renal mass biopsy has excellent diagnostic accuracy, significantly reduces renal surgery for benign masses and low-grade/stage renal cell carcinoma, and increases conservative surgical excision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术切除前肾肿块活检:在UroCCR登记处的实践、诊断表现和对管理的影响(辅助研究No. 118)
背景和目的肾肿块活检(RMB)在手术切除肾肿块之前并不被系统推荐,尽管它在确定肾肿块方面具有较高的准确性和低发病率。我们的目的是确定RMB的诊断准确性,与RMB实践相关的临床和肿瘤因素,以及RMB对当代前瞻性国家登记- uroccr(2010-2021)肾细胞癌管理的影响。方法:我们选择所有接受手术治疗的单一肾肿块(pT1-4、N0-2、M0或良性)患者,并根据既往RMB表现对其进行分层。接受主动监测、经皮消融治疗或立体定向放疗的患者被排除在外。在RMB组中测定RMB的诊断准确性。使用逻辑回归分析与RMBs实践相关的临床和肿瘤因素。主要发现和局限性共纳入9283例患者,其中1594例肿瘤(17%)既往有RMB。人民币占92.4%。在确定良/恶性疾病、组织学亚型和分级方面,RMB与切除的相关性分别为96.9%、86.4%和52.6%。根据良性病变的手术切除率和部分肾切除术率(63.9% vs 57.8%;p & lt;0.001)。结论及临床意义:在诊断价值高的情况下,很少进行san RMB检查。既往RMB显著改变了局部肾肿块的处理,良性肾肿块的手术次数减少,保守治疗比例较高。在一项大型的当代研究中,我们证明了肾肿块活检具有出色的诊断准确性,显著减少了良性肿块和低级别/分期肾细胞癌的肾脏手术,并增加了保守手术切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Trifecta Outcomes after Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Dual Mesh in Single-center Cohort Beyond Discrimination Metrics: A Bayesian Reinterpretation of S2,3PSA% for Individual Patient Counseling Reduced Rate of Complications With Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Real-world Data From a National Cohort Derived From the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry Familial Risks in 317 000 Patients With Prostate Cancer in Relation to Metastases and Survival-Guiding Diagnostics Role of Local Treatment to the Prostate in Patients With de Novo Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1