{"title":"The causal inference between bullying victimization and mental well-being: The mediating role of social withdrawal and the moderating role of coping","authors":"Ning Ding , Chunkai Li","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research has extensively explored the direct and indirect relationship between bullying victimization and the mental well-being of children with underlying mechanisms through cross-sectional data. However, limited knowledge exists regarding the causal inference and potential underlying mechanisms in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study delves into these effects among Chinese children, investigating the mediating roles of social withdrawal and the moderating role of approach coping strategies using a two-wave longitudinal design.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>This study collected two-wave data with a six-month interval from a cohort of 863 Chinese children. 49.7 % were identified as female and 50.3 % of samples were males, with an average age of 14.01 at Wave 1. Following the acquisition of informed consent from their legal guardians, all students voluntarily completed the self-report questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized <em>R</em> software to conduct data analysis. Half-longitudinal mediation and moderation models were adopted to examine the effects on mental well-being. Multi-group path analysis was used to examine the group differences in left-behind status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The research results indicated that bullying victimization exhibited both direct (<em>β</em> = −0.085, <em>p</em> < 0.01) and indirect (<em>β</em> = −0.017, <em>p</em> < 0.05, 95 % CI: [−0.030, −0.002]) effects on diminished mental well-being, mediated by social withdrawal. In addition, higher levels of approach coping strategies act as a buffer in the adverse effect of bullying victimization on children's mental well-being (<em>β</em> = −0.054, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Furthermore, the study highlighted that the left-behind status significantly moderated the relationship between peer victimization and social withdrawal. Interestingly, this relationship was notably significant in non-left-behind children rather than their left-behind counterparts (<em>β</em> <sub>non-left-behind</sub> = 0.121, <em>p</em> < 0.01; <em>β</em> <sub>left-behind</sub> = 0.006, <em>p</em> = 0.926).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings enhance our comprehension of the intricate interplay between victimization and well-being, offering crucial insights for policymakers and social workers to craft targeted interventions. By developing a deeper understanding of how victimization influences psychological well-being, tailored strategies can be formulated to effectively support children impacted by such experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research has extensively explored the direct and indirect relationship between bullying victimization and the mental well-being of children with underlying mechanisms through cross-sectional data. However, limited knowledge exists regarding the causal inference and potential underlying mechanisms in this context.
Objective
This study delves into these effects among Chinese children, investigating the mediating roles of social withdrawal and the moderating role of approach coping strategies using a two-wave longitudinal design.
Participants and setting
This study collected two-wave data with a six-month interval from a cohort of 863 Chinese children. 49.7 % were identified as female and 50.3 % of samples were males, with an average age of 14.01 at Wave 1. Following the acquisition of informed consent from their legal guardians, all students voluntarily completed the self-report questionnaires.
Methods
The study utilized R software to conduct data analysis. Half-longitudinal mediation and moderation models were adopted to examine the effects on mental well-being. Multi-group path analysis was used to examine the group differences in left-behind status.
Results
The research results indicated that bullying victimization exhibited both direct (β = −0.085, p < 0.01) and indirect (β = −0.017, p < 0.05, 95 % CI: [−0.030, −0.002]) effects on diminished mental well-being, mediated by social withdrawal. In addition, higher levels of approach coping strategies act as a buffer in the adverse effect of bullying victimization on children's mental well-being (β = −0.054, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the study highlighted that the left-behind status significantly moderated the relationship between peer victimization and social withdrawal. Interestingly, this relationship was notably significant in non-left-behind children rather than their left-behind counterparts (βnon-left-behind = 0.121, p < 0.01; βleft-behind = 0.006, p = 0.926).
Conclusion
These findings enhance our comprehension of the intricate interplay between victimization and well-being, offering crucial insights for policymakers and social workers to craft targeted interventions. By developing a deeper understanding of how victimization influences psychological well-being, tailored strategies can be formulated to effectively support children impacted by such experiences.
期刊介绍:
Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.