Laser-ablation vs. bulk tissue ICP-MS for conifer tissue elemental analysis

IF 8.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Chemosphere Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144200
Jasmine M. Williams , Sean C. Thomas
{"title":"Laser-ablation vs. bulk tissue ICP-MS for conifer tissue elemental analysis","authors":"Jasmine M. Williams ,&nbsp;Sean C. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP-MS) has emerged as a robust tool for directly measuring trace elements in solid, intact samples. Laser ablation requires minimal sample preparation, whereas more conventional bulk sample analysis entails preliminary size reduction and acid digestion, and hence risks sample contamination and volatilization losses. LA ICP-MS may allow for rapid determination of elemental constitution in plants at low detection limits; however, application of LA ICP-MS on plant tissues is challenged by sample heterogeneity, as well as the lack of recognized standards for calibration and criteria for sample preparation. We analyzed needle samples from an adult jack pine (<em>Pinus banksiana</em> L.) tree through LA ICP-MS using a widely available NIST SRM 610 quartz calibration standard, with <sup>43</sup>Ca as an internal standard element measured by electron probe microanalysis. LA ICP-MS analyses were run on intact needle samples and on pulverized, homogenized and pelletized samples (n = 21), and compared to needles dried, ground, and analyzed in triplicate with aqua regia acid digestion and conventional ICP-MS. Overall, the LA ICP-MS measures on intact pine samples accurately predicted the chemical composition of pine needle tissue obtained by the bulk sample acid-digestion and ICP-MS method for most elements, while preliminary pulverizing and pelletizing did not result in greater accuracy or reduced bias. LA ICP-MS analysis of many plant nutrients (<sup>31</sup>P, <sup>24</sup>Mg, <sup>66</sup>Zn) from both intact and pelletized tree needle samples matched the values obtained from acid-digestion ICP-MS most closely, while measures of less-stable metals (such as <sup>140</sup>Ce, <sup>139</sup>La, and <sup>57</sup>Fe) deviated more from acid-digested samples. Values of <sup>39</sup>K estimates varied between methods, as storage of <sup>39</sup>K is preferentially located in needle mesophyll layers beyond laser depths. Large deviations were found for volatile elements, with significantly lower <sup>208</sup>Pb concentrations measured by LA ICP-MS than acid-digested samples. We conclude that LA ICP-MS of intact tissues is a viable tool for accurate, non-destructive analysis for most elements and is particularly suitable for analysis of small samples and for volatile elements not amenable to conventional methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":276,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 144200"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653525001420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP-MS) has emerged as a robust tool for directly measuring trace elements in solid, intact samples. Laser ablation requires minimal sample preparation, whereas more conventional bulk sample analysis entails preliminary size reduction and acid digestion, and hence risks sample contamination and volatilization losses. LA ICP-MS may allow for rapid determination of elemental constitution in plants at low detection limits; however, application of LA ICP-MS on plant tissues is challenged by sample heterogeneity, as well as the lack of recognized standards for calibration and criteria for sample preparation. We analyzed needle samples from an adult jack pine (Pinus banksiana L.) tree through LA ICP-MS using a widely available NIST SRM 610 quartz calibration standard, with 43Ca as an internal standard element measured by electron probe microanalysis. LA ICP-MS analyses were run on intact needle samples and on pulverized, homogenized and pelletized samples (n = 21), and compared to needles dried, ground, and analyzed in triplicate with aqua regia acid digestion and conventional ICP-MS. Overall, the LA ICP-MS measures on intact pine samples accurately predicted the chemical composition of pine needle tissue obtained by the bulk sample acid-digestion and ICP-MS method for most elements, while preliminary pulverizing and pelletizing did not result in greater accuracy or reduced bias. LA ICP-MS analysis of many plant nutrients (31P, 24Mg, 66Zn) from both intact and pelletized tree needle samples matched the values obtained from acid-digestion ICP-MS most closely, while measures of less-stable metals (such as 140Ce, 139La, and 57Fe) deviated more from acid-digested samples. Values of 39K estimates varied between methods, as storage of 39K is preferentially located in needle mesophyll layers beyond laser depths. Large deviations were found for volatile elements, with significantly lower 208Pb concentrations measured by LA ICP-MS than acid-digested samples. We conclude that LA ICP-MS of intact tissues is a viable tool for accurate, non-destructive analysis for most elements and is particularly suitable for analysis of small samples and for volatile elements not amenable to conventional methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光消融与散装组织ICP-MS用于针叶树组织元素分析
激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA ICP-MS)已成为直接测量固体完整样品中微量元素的强大工具。激光烧蚀需要最少的样品制备,而更传统的散装样品分析需要初步缩小尺寸和酸消化,因此有样品污染和挥发损失的风险。LA ICP-MS可以在低检出限下快速测定植物中的元素组成;然而,LA ICP-MS在植物组织上的应用受到样品异质性以及缺乏公认的校准标准和样品制备标准的挑战。我们使用广泛使用的NIST SRM 610石英校准标准,以43Ca作为电子探针微量分析的内标元素,通过LA ICP-MS分析了成年jack pine (Pinus banksiana L.)树的针样。LA ICP-MS分析了完整的针样和粉碎、均质和颗粒化的样品(n = 21),并与干燥、研磨的针样进行了比较,并用王水酸消化和常规ICP-MS进行了三次分析。总体而言,完整松树样品的LA ICP-MS测量准确地预测了大部分元素的散装样品酸消化和ICP-MS方法获得的松针组织的化学成分,而初步粉碎和制粒并没有导致更高的准确性或减少偏差。从完整的和颗粒状的树针样品中获得的许多植物营养物质(31P, 24Mg, 66Zn)的LA ICP-MS分析结果与酸消化ICP-MS结果最接近,而对不太稳定的金属(如140Ce, 139La和57Fe)的测量结果与酸消化样品的误差更大。不同方法的39K估计值不同,因为39K的储存优先位于激光深度以外的针叶肉层。挥发性元素的测定偏差较大,LA ICP-MS测定的208Pb浓度明显低于酸消化样品。我们得出结论,完整组织的LA ICP-MS是对大多数元素进行准确,非破坏性分析的可行工具,特别适合分析小样本和传统方法无法处理的挥发性元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemosphere
Chemosphere 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
4975
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemosphere, being an international multidisciplinary journal, is dedicated to publishing original communications and review articles on chemicals in the environment. The scope covers a wide range of topics, including the identification, quantification, behavior, fate, toxicology, treatment, and remediation of chemicals in the bio-, hydro-, litho-, and atmosphere, ensuring the broad dissemination of research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Advances in biocatalytic textiles enabled by immobilized enzyme for water purification and CO2 capture applications Closed-loop recycling: Could Denmark produce clinker from end-of-life concrete at scale? A clean-up method to remove taurine conjugated bile acid isomers interference for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) analysis in biotic matrices by isotope dilution LC-MS/MS and investigation of other MRMs interference Swimming impairment caused by pharmaceuticals in native and invasive fishes: A comparison of fluoxetine effects in two poeciliid species Fluorescent sensor approaches for mercury detection: Chemosensors, carbon dots, MOFs, and nanomaterials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1