Comprehensive performance evaluation and sustainability ranking of battery technologies based on hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic decision-making

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119594
Sayan Das , Manuel Baumann , Marcel Weil
{"title":"Comprehensive performance evaluation and sustainability ranking of battery technologies based on hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic decision-making","authors":"Sayan Das ,&nbsp;Manuel Baumann ,&nbsp;Marcel Weil","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Battery energy storage systems, in particular emerging systems based on abundant materials such as sodium and potassium are considered as sustainable alternatives to current lithium-based systems. However, sustainability assessment as well as the identification of potential improvement potentials require a complex assessment of multiple factors, including technical, economic, environmental and socio-political aspects. The interdependence and uncertainty of these criteria, particularly with qualitative data related to very different technology readiness levels (TRL), pose a significant challenge for robust assessments. The study proposes a new hesitant-intuitionistic framework for selecting energy storage technologies and to identify relevant improvement potentials, addressing all dimensions of sustainability under linguistic hesitancy and uncertainty. It uniquely incorporates detailed quantitative environmental impact data and raw material-based social sub-factors are also identified as the key factors that influence decision-making. The robustness of the results is validated with an additional fuzzy-decision making approach. Finally, the obstacle degree of each criterion and sub-criteria is conducted along with an uncertainty analysis to identify fields for improvement. The study exemplarily evaluates three different battery chemistries LiFePO<sub>4</sub> as state-of-the-art technology, and KFeSO<sub>4</sub>F and NaNMMT as emerging technologies. First results indicate that the NaNMMT battery is the most sustainable option followed by LiFePO<sub>4</sub> and KFeSO<sub>4</sub>F when socio-political factors are not considered. Whereas LiFePO<sub>4</sub> leads when this factor is included with other factors. The study identifies the environmental factor as the most influential in decision-making. Additionally, sub-factors such as cell voltage, energy density, cathode specific capacity, capital cost, price fluctuations, demand growth, and global warming also significantly impact the decision-making process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 119594"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425001177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery energy storage systems, in particular emerging systems based on abundant materials such as sodium and potassium are considered as sustainable alternatives to current lithium-based systems. However, sustainability assessment as well as the identification of potential improvement potentials require a complex assessment of multiple factors, including technical, economic, environmental and socio-political aspects. The interdependence and uncertainty of these criteria, particularly with qualitative data related to very different technology readiness levels (TRL), pose a significant challenge for robust assessments. The study proposes a new hesitant-intuitionistic framework for selecting energy storage technologies and to identify relevant improvement potentials, addressing all dimensions of sustainability under linguistic hesitancy and uncertainty. It uniquely incorporates detailed quantitative environmental impact data and raw material-based social sub-factors are also identified as the key factors that influence decision-making. The robustness of the results is validated with an additional fuzzy-decision making approach. Finally, the obstacle degree of each criterion and sub-criteria is conducted along with an uncertainty analysis to identify fields for improvement. The study exemplarily evaluates three different battery chemistries LiFePO4 as state-of-the-art technology, and KFeSO4F and NaNMMT as emerging technologies. First results indicate that the NaNMMT battery is the most sustainable option followed by LiFePO4 and KFeSO4F when socio-political factors are not considered. Whereas LiFePO4 leads when this factor is included with other factors. The study identifies the environmental factor as the most influential in decision-making. Additionally, sub-factors such as cell voltage, energy density, cathode specific capacity, capital cost, price fluctuations, demand growth, and global warming also significantly impact the decision-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于犹豫直觉模糊语言决策的电池技术综合性能评价与可持续性排序
电池储能系统,特别是基于钠和钾等丰富材料的新兴系统,被认为是当前锂基系统的可持续替代品。但是,可持续性评价以及查明潜在的改进潜力需要对多种因素进行复杂的评价,包括技术、经济、环境和社会政治方面。这些标准的相互依赖性和不确定性,特别是与非常不同的技术准备水平(TRL)相关的定性数据,对可靠的评估构成了重大挑战。该研究提出了一个新的犹豫直觉框架,用于选择储能技术,并确定相关的改进潜力,解决语言犹豫和不确定性下可持续性的各个方面。它独特地结合了详细的定量环境影响数据和基于原材料的社会子因素也被确定为影响决策的关键因素。通过附加的模糊决策方法验证了结果的鲁棒性。最后,对各准则和子准则的障碍程度进行分析,并进行不确定性分析,以确定需要改进的领域。该研究举例评估了三种不同的电池化学物质,LiFePO4是最先进的技术,KFeSO4F和NaNMMT是新兴技术。首先,研究结果表明,在不考虑社会政治因素的情况下,NaNMMT电池是最可持续的选择,其次是LiFePO4和KFeSO4F。然而,当这个因素与其他因素包括在一起时,LiFePO4领先。该研究确定环境因素对决策的影响最大。此外,诸如电池电压、能量密度、阴极比容量、资本成本、价格波动、需求增长和全球变暖等子因素也显著影响决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Advancing hydrogen infrastructure planning: A scalable bottom-up approach for industrial demand scenarios Multi-time scale synergy in heterogeneous energy storage systems: Coordinated scheduling optimization for natural gas network Enhancing electric vehicle participation in microgrids through Stackelberg bi-level optimization Radiation capture and photothermal conversion characteristics of an intermittently-tracked non-imaging concentrator based on the edge-ray principle Inertial-resolved multi-material topology optimization of fluid-solid-porous architectures for enhanced thermohydraulic performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1