Factors associated with performance on the emergency medicine qualifying examination

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1002/aet2.11065
Sally A. Santen MD, PhD, Yvette Calderon MD, MS, Earl Reisdorff MD, Mary M. Johnston PhD, Kevin B. Joldersma PhD, Theodore Corbin MD, Chadd K. Kraus DO, MPH, DrPH, Dowin Boatright MD, MBA, MHS
{"title":"Factors associated with performance on the emergency medicine qualifying examination","authors":"Sally A. Santen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yvette Calderon MD, MS,&nbsp;Earl Reisdorff MD,&nbsp;Mary M. Johnston PhD,&nbsp;Kevin B. Joldersma PhD,&nbsp;Theodore Corbin MD,&nbsp;Chadd K. Kraus DO, MPH, DrPH,&nbsp;Dowin Boatright MD, MBA, MHS","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Board certification standards exceed the baseline requirements for state licensure, assuring the public that specialists demonstrate additional clinical skills, knowledge, and professional behavior to provide safe and high-quality specialty care. The objective of this study was to determine what physician factors (e.g., gender, age, race/ethnicity, medical school training, and other factors) were associated with the American Board of Emergency Medicine qualifying examination (QE) performance and pass rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a national retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study exploring factors associated with the QE. Subjects were physicians who graduated from accredited emergency medicine (EM) categorical residency programs who took the QE for the first time in 2017, 2018, or 2019. A series of multilevel models was used to examine if physician characteristics were related to score and passing the QE. Relative risks were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 6174 EM graduates, 2118 of whom were women and 588 who were underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians. Controlling for other variables, in-training examination (ITE) scores and medical doctor (MD) degrees were positively related to mean QE scores, whereas age, 3-year programs, URiM, and male gender were negatively related to mean QE scores. The QE pass rate was 94%, 95% for non-URiM and 86% for URiM. Results of the full model indicated ITE score, age, URiM, gender, MD degree, and residency program format were significantly related to performance on the QE. In the final model, passing the QE was positively related to ITE scores and negatively related to age and URiM. After other variables were controlled for, the adjusted risk ratio for URiM was 0.94.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Several factors were associated with decreased pass rates on the ABEM QE including ITE scores, older age, and URiM, although the risk ratios were small.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Board certification standards exceed the baseline requirements for state licensure, assuring the public that specialists demonstrate additional clinical skills, knowledge, and professional behavior to provide safe and high-quality specialty care. The objective of this study was to determine what physician factors (e.g., gender, age, race/ethnicity, medical school training, and other factors) were associated with the American Board of Emergency Medicine qualifying examination (QE) performance and pass rates.

Methods

This was a national retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study exploring factors associated with the QE. Subjects were physicians who graduated from accredited emergency medicine (EM) categorical residency programs who took the QE for the first time in 2017, 2018, or 2019. A series of multilevel models was used to examine if physician characteristics were related to score and passing the QE. Relative risks were calculated.

Results

There were 6174 EM graduates, 2118 of whom were women and 588 who were underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians. Controlling for other variables, in-training examination (ITE) scores and medical doctor (MD) degrees were positively related to mean QE scores, whereas age, 3-year programs, URiM, and male gender were negatively related to mean QE scores. The QE pass rate was 94%, 95% for non-URiM and 86% for URiM. Results of the full model indicated ITE score, age, URiM, gender, MD degree, and residency program format were significantly related to performance on the QE. In the final model, passing the QE was positively related to ITE scores and negatively related to age and URiM. After other variables were controlled for, the adjusted risk ratio for URiM was 0.94.

Conclusions

Several factors were associated with decreased pass rates on the ABEM QE including ITE scores, older age, and URiM, although the risk ratios were small.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景 美国急诊医学委员会的认证标准超过了各州执照的基本要求,向公众保证专科医生能够展现出更多的临床技能、知识和专业行为,以提供安全、优质的专科医疗服务。本研究旨在确定哪些医生因素(如性别、年龄、种族/民族、医学院培训和其他因素)与美国急诊医学委员会资格考试(QE)成绩和通过率相关。 方法 这是一项全国性的回顾性、观察性、横断面研究,探讨与 QE 相关的因素。研究对象是毕业于经认可的急诊医学(EM)分类住院医师培训项目的医生,他们在 2017 年、2018 年或 2019 年首次参加了 QE。我们使用了一系列多层次模型来研究医生的特征是否与 QE 的得分和通过率有关。计算了相对风险。 结果 有 6174 名少管所毕业生,其中 2118 名是女性,588 名是医学领域代表性不足(URiM)的医生。在控制其他变量的情况下,培训中考试(ITE)分数和医学博士(MD)学位与平均 QE 分数呈正相关,而年龄、3 年制课程、URiM 和男性性别与平均 QE 分数呈负相关。QE 通过率为 94%,非 URiM 为 95%,URiM 为 86%。完整模型的结果表明,ITE 分数、年龄、URiM、性别、医学博士学位和住院医师培训项目形式与 QE 成绩有显著关系。在最终模型中,通过 QE 与 ITE 分数呈正相关,而与年龄和 URiM 呈负相关。在控制了其他变量后,URiM 的调整风险比为 0.94。 结论 有几个因素与 ABEM QE 通过率下降有关,包括 ITE 分数、年龄较大和 URiM,尽管风险比很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Fundamentals of telehealth: A learning compendium for residents The shadow that follows The role of tele-ultrasound for real-time remote guidance for femoral nerve blocks in the emergency department Reducing physical assaults on residents through implementation of project BETA: Best practices in the evaluation and treatment of agitation Factors associated with performance on the emergency medicine qualifying examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1