What Language Should We Use When Talking About Children With Specific Learning Disorders? A Study Exploring the Preference of Australian Parents, Professionals and Adults Who Have a Specific Learning Disorder

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Dyslexia Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1002/dys.70000
Hayley Anthony, Louise McLean, Aspasia Stacey Rabba, Andrea Reupert
{"title":"What Language Should We Use When Talking About Children With Specific Learning Disorders? A Study Exploring the Preference of Australian Parents, Professionals and Adults Who Have a Specific Learning Disorder","authors":"Hayley Anthony,&nbsp;Louise McLean,&nbsp;Aspasia Stacey Rabba,&nbsp;Andrea Reupert","doi":"10.1002/dys.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Australia, a broad range of terms are used when discussing children and young people with a specific learning disorder (SLD). However, little is known about how SLD-related terminology is perceived by adults with an SLD, parents of children with an SLD and the professionals who support them. The purpose of this study was to identify any SLD-related preferred terms and explore factors which may influence these preferences. Data were collected from 177 participants via an online survey which asked them to rate how much they liked each term from a provided list and why. Results showed that clear language preferences do exist amongst dyslexic adults, parents and professionals, with <i>dyslexia/dysgraphia/dyscalculia, dyslexic/dysgraphic/dyscalculic</i>, <i>person with dyslexia/dysgraphia/ dyscalculia</i> and <i>challenges</i> being the most liked terms whilst <i>learning disability, learning disabled, impairment, deficit, weakness</i> and <i>person with a learning disability</i> were amongst the least liked terms. A narrative synthesis revealed that participants' language preferences are largely dependent on the context and intent of communication, generating six key themes. This research offers clear implications on how society embraces strengths and diversity, including language use, and the impact this can have on individuals with SLDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, a broad range of terms are used when discussing children and young people with a specific learning disorder (SLD). However, little is known about how SLD-related terminology is perceived by adults with an SLD, parents of children with an SLD and the professionals who support them. The purpose of this study was to identify any SLD-related preferred terms and explore factors which may influence these preferences. Data were collected from 177 participants via an online survey which asked them to rate how much they liked each term from a provided list and why. Results showed that clear language preferences do exist amongst dyslexic adults, parents and professionals, with dyslexia/dysgraphia/dyscalculia, dyslexic/dysgraphic/dyscalculic, person with dyslexia/dysgraphia/ dyscalculia and challenges being the most liked terms whilst learning disability, learning disabled, impairment, deficit, weakness and person with a learning disability were amongst the least liked terms. A narrative synthesis revealed that participants' language preferences are largely dependent on the context and intent of communication, generating six key themes. This research offers clear implications on how society embraces strengths and diversity, including language use, and the impact this can have on individuals with SLDs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在澳大利亚,人们在讨论患有特殊学习障碍(SLD)的儿童和青少年时会使用各种各样的术语。然而,人们对患有特殊学习障碍的成年人、特殊学习障碍儿童的家长以及为他们提供支持的专业人员如何看待与特殊学习障碍相关的术语却知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定任何与 SLD 相关的首选术语,并探讨可能影响这些首选的因素。研究通过在线调查的方式收集了 177 名参与者的数据,要求他们对所提供列表中的每个术语的喜爱程度和原因进行评分。结果表明,在有阅读障碍的成年人、家长和专业人士中确实存在明显的语言偏好,最喜欢的术语是 "阅读障碍/书写障碍/计算障碍"、"阅读障碍/书写障碍/计算障碍"、"有阅读障碍/书写障碍/计算障碍的人 "和 "挑战",而最不喜欢的术语是 "学习障碍"、"学习障碍者"、"障碍"、"缺陷"、"弱点 "和 "有学习障碍的人"。叙事综述显示,参与者的语言偏好在很大程度上取决于交流的背景和意图,并由此产生了六个关键主题。这项研究对社会如何接受优势和多样性(包括语言使用)以及这可能对患有特殊学习障碍的个人产生的影响具有明确的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
期刊最新文献
What Language Should We Use When Talking About Children With Specific Learning Disorders? A Study Exploring the Preference of Australian Parents, Professionals and Adults Who Have a Specific Learning Disorder Adults With Dyslexia Use Internalised Beat Cues Less Than Controls When Estimating Interval Length Development and Validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) for Chinese INSIGHT: Combining Fixation Visualisations and Residual Neural Networks for Dyslexia Classification From Eye-Tracking Data Cognitive-Linguistic Profiles Underlying Reading Difficulties Within the Unique Characteristics of Hebrew Language and Writing System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1