AI Affordances and EFL Learners' Speaking Engagement: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Learner Type

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70041
Fang Huang, Dingyang Peng, Timothy Teo
{"title":"AI Affordances and EFL Learners' Speaking Engagement: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Learner Type","authors":"Fang Huang,&nbsp;Dingyang Peng,&nbsp;Timothy Teo","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Contextualised in the AI–supported English-speaking learning, this study examined the roles of AI affordances in influencing EFL learners' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural speaking engagement, and explored the moderating roles of gender and learner types (on-campus vs. on-job) in influencing AI-supported English-speaking engagement. Data collected from 332 Chinese EFL learners (159 on-campus and 173 on-job learners) were analysed by using structural equation modelling. Results indicated that Chinese EFL learners perceived AI affordances to be significant in influencing their emotional, cognitive and behavioural engagement in practicing their spoken English. The results from the PLS-SEM model revealed that AI affordances accounted for 54.7%, 52.4% and 56.0% of the variance in emotional engagement, cognitive engagement and behavioural engagement, respectively. Learner type was not found to significantly moderate the relationships between AI affordances and speaking engagement. Gender was found to be a significant moderator for the AI affordances–behavioural engagement and AI affordance–cognitive engagement relationships. These findings enrich existing literature about AI–empowered speaking engagement and provide practical implications for English teachers to design effective speaking-teaching models.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contextualised in the AI–supported English-speaking learning, this study examined the roles of AI affordances in influencing EFL learners' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural speaking engagement, and explored the moderating roles of gender and learner types (on-campus vs. on-job) in influencing AI-supported English-speaking engagement. Data collected from 332 Chinese EFL learners (159 on-campus and 173 on-job learners) were analysed by using structural equation modelling. Results indicated that Chinese EFL learners perceived AI affordances to be significant in influencing their emotional, cognitive and behavioural engagement in practicing their spoken English. The results from the PLS-SEM model revealed that AI affordances accounted for 54.7%, 52.4% and 56.0% of the variance in emotional engagement, cognitive engagement and behavioural engagement, respectively. Learner type was not found to significantly moderate the relationships between AI affordances and speaking engagement. Gender was found to be a significant moderator for the AI affordances–behavioural engagement and AI affordance–cognitive engagement relationships. These findings enrich existing literature about AI–empowered speaking engagement and provide practical implications for English teachers to design effective speaking-teaching models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能支持与英语学习者的口语投入:性别和学习者类型的调节作用
本研究以人工智能支持的英语学习为背景,考察了人工智能支持在影响英语学习者的情感、认知和行为语言参与方面的作用,并探讨了性别和学习者类型(校园vs在职)在影响人工智能支持的英语参与方面的调节作用。本文采用结构方程模型对332名中国英语学习者(159名在校学生和173名在职学生)的数据进行了分析。结果表明,中国英语学习者认为人工智能的支持显著影响了他们在练习英语口语时的情绪、认知和行为参与。PLS-SEM模型的结果显示,人工智能启示分别占情感投入、认知投入和行为投入方差的54.7%、52.4%和56.0%。没有发现学习者类型显著调节人工智能支持和口语参与之间的关系。性别被发现是人工智能功能支持-行为参与和人工智能功能支持-认知参与关系的重要调节因素。这些发现丰富了现有关于人工智能支持的口语参与的文献,并为英语教师设计有效的口语教学模式提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Correction to ‘ChatGPT-Generated Versus Teacher-Prepared Read-Aloud Plans: A Comparative Effectiveness Study’ The Role of Digital Transformation and English Language Technological Self-Efficacy in the Era of Artificial Intelligence “Becoming-With the World”: Embodied Perspective-Shifting Practices and the Development of Educators' Transformative Agency Conceptions of Artificial Intelligence Learning Among Elementary School Students in Xizang: A Drawing and Epistemic Network Analysis Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Insights From a Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Highly Cited Articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1