How Teacher Efficacy and Receptivity Affect the Perceived Outcomes of Curriculum Reform in Myanmar Basic Education

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70022
Kyaw Min Latt, Gao Wei
{"title":"How Teacher Efficacy and Receptivity Affect the Perceived Outcomes of Curriculum Reform in Myanmar Basic Education","authors":"Kyaw Min Latt,&nbsp;Gao Wei","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There are few published studies on teacher efficacy and receptivity in Myanmar basic education curriculum reform. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of teacher efficacy and receptivity to the new curriculum implementation and their impact on perceived outcomes of the curriculum reform, using SEM. A mixed-method inquiry was applied, and the sample was 800 primary teachers to conduct surveys and eight teachers to interview. The test items were calculated to determine whether there was reliability and validity or not. Results showed that primary teachers feel assured that they have the ability and skills to influence their students' achievement in the new curriculum and they positively perceive the new curriculum reform and are receptive to its implementation. Primary teachers from urban and more experienced teachers are more acceptable the new curriculum rather than those from rural and less-experienced ones. In examining SEM, teachers with strong self-efficacy beliefs, the practicality of the new curriculum, feelings in comparison with the previous education system, and behavioural intentions are better able to implement the new curriculum successfully in Myanmar and the correlation of teacher efficacy and receptivity was a novel finding and the relationship between them was very high. With great expectations on Myanmar's educational system, primary teachers encounter the challenges in the implementation of curriculum reform though they can perceive the outcomes of curriculum reform.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few published studies on teacher efficacy and receptivity in Myanmar basic education curriculum reform. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of teacher efficacy and receptivity to the new curriculum implementation and their impact on perceived outcomes of the curriculum reform, using SEM. A mixed-method inquiry was applied, and the sample was 800 primary teachers to conduct surveys and eight teachers to interview. The test items were calculated to determine whether there was reliability and validity or not. Results showed that primary teachers feel assured that they have the ability and skills to influence their students' achievement in the new curriculum and they positively perceive the new curriculum reform and are receptive to its implementation. Primary teachers from urban and more experienced teachers are more acceptable the new curriculum rather than those from rural and less-experienced ones. In examining SEM, teachers with strong self-efficacy beliefs, the practicality of the new curriculum, feelings in comparison with the previous education system, and behavioural intentions are better able to implement the new curriculum successfully in Myanmar and the correlation of teacher efficacy and receptivity was a novel finding and the relationship between them was very high. With great expectations on Myanmar's educational system, primary teachers encounter the challenges in the implementation of curriculum reform though they can perceive the outcomes of curriculum reform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缅甸基础教育课程改革中教师效能感和接受度如何影响感知结果
缅甸基础教育课程改革中教师效能感和接受性的研究较少。本研究的目的是利用扫描电镜来检验教师效能感和接受新课程实施的程度,以及它们对课程改革感知结果的影响。采用混合调查法,以800名小学教师为样本进行调查,并对8名教师进行访谈。计算测试项目以确定是否存在信度和效度。结果表明,小学教师确信自己有能力和技能影响学生在新课程中的成绩,他们积极地看待新课程改革并接受其实施。来自城市和经验丰富的小学教师比来自农村和经验不足的小学教师更容易接受新课程。在检查SEM时,具有强烈自我效能信念、新课程的实用性、与以前的教育系统相比的感受和行为意图的教师更能在缅甸成功实施新课程,教师效能感和接受度的相关性是一个新的发现,它们之间的关系非常高。对缅甸教育体制寄予厚望的小学教师虽然能够感知到课程改革的成果,但在课程改革的实施过程中也遇到了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
“Don't Give up the Power to Think!”: A Case Study of English Language Teachers' AI Ethics and AI-Induced Emotions Exploring the Relationships Among Teacher Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, Academic Resilience, Learning Engagement, and Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study University as a Knowscape for Epistemic Emancipation: Possibilities and Constraints Why Is It Difficult to Stay in the Profession? The Life Course of Early-Career Teachers in Rural China Self-Efficacy and Perceived Teacher Support of EFL Students in Predicting Their Engagement and Well-Being in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1