Atypical pulmonary cysts in lung cancer screening: prevalence, outcomes, and clinical implications.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11427-1
Sung Hyun An, Seulgi You, You Na Kim, Joo Sung Sun
{"title":"Atypical pulmonary cysts in lung cancer screening: prevalence, outcomes, and clinical implications.","authors":"Sung Hyun An, Seulgi You, You Na Kim, Joo Sung Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11427-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to examine the prevalence and clinical outcomes of atypical pulmonary cysts (APCs) in lung cancer screening (LCS) and evaluate the impact of APC introduction on Lung-RADS v2022 categorization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We reviewed 2968 low-dose baseline chest CT scans from LCS participants between June 2017 and April 2023. Two thoracic radiologists assessed the presence and type of APCs and evaluated interval changes. We also investigated how the introduction of APC changed Lung-RADS categories. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2968 participants (2900 men, 68 women; median age: 61 years [IQR: 57-65]), 18 (0.6%) had APCs. The interobserver agreement for APC presence was fair (κ = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.07-0.44). Among the 16 APC cases with follow-up CTs (median follow-up: 22 months), lung cancer was confirmed in three cases (18.8%). Among the remaining 13 APCs, 4 (30.8%) showed growth, 7 (53.8%) showed no change and 2 (15.4%) exhibited decreased wall thickness. Histological confirmation was not obtained for these 13 cases, indicating a minimum cancer rate of 18.8%. The introduction of APC led to a positive result change in 0.4% of participants (12/2968), with two lung cancer cases among them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>APCs were infrequent in LCS, with a 0.6% prevalence, but had a high cancer rate (18.8%). Although the introduction of APC led to a 0.4% increase in positive screenings, this is considered acceptable as it included two lung cancer cases, highlighting the importance of recognizing APCs for early lung cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question What is the prevalence and clinical significance of APCs detected during LCS, and how do they impact diagnostic outcomes? Findings APCs were detected in 0.6% of participants, with a high cancer rate of at least 18.8%, and increased screening positive results by 0.4%. Clinical relevance APCs during LCS, although uncommon, are crucial because of their high risk of lung cancer. This enhances early detection of lung cancer and improves patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4873-4881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11427-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to examine the prevalence and clinical outcomes of atypical pulmonary cysts (APCs) in lung cancer screening (LCS) and evaluate the impact of APC introduction on Lung-RADS v2022 categorization.

Materials and methods: We reviewed 2968 low-dose baseline chest CT scans from LCS participants between June 2017 and April 2023. Two thoracic radiologists assessed the presence and type of APCs and evaluated interval changes. We also investigated how the introduction of APC changed Lung-RADS categories. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: Of the 2968 participants (2900 men, 68 women; median age: 61 years [IQR: 57-65]), 18 (0.6%) had APCs. The interobserver agreement for APC presence was fair (κ = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.07-0.44). Among the 16 APC cases with follow-up CTs (median follow-up: 22 months), lung cancer was confirmed in three cases (18.8%). Among the remaining 13 APCs, 4 (30.8%) showed growth, 7 (53.8%) showed no change and 2 (15.4%) exhibited decreased wall thickness. Histological confirmation was not obtained for these 13 cases, indicating a minimum cancer rate of 18.8%. The introduction of APC led to a positive result change in 0.4% of participants (12/2968), with two lung cancer cases among them.

Conclusion: APCs were infrequent in LCS, with a 0.6% prevalence, but had a high cancer rate (18.8%). Although the introduction of APC led to a 0.4% increase in positive screenings, this is considered acceptable as it included two lung cancer cases, highlighting the importance of recognizing APCs for early lung cancer detection.

Key points: Question What is the prevalence and clinical significance of APCs detected during LCS, and how do they impact diagnostic outcomes? Findings APCs were detected in 0.6% of participants, with a high cancer rate of at least 18.8%, and increased screening positive results by 0.4%. Clinical relevance APCs during LCS, although uncommon, are crucial because of their high risk of lung cancer. This enhances early detection of lung cancer and improves patient management strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌筛查中的非典型肺囊肿:患病率、结果和临床意义。
目的:研究非典型肺囊肿(APC)在肺癌筛查(LCS)中的患病率和临床结果,并评估APC引入对lung - rads v2022分类的影响。材料和方法:我们回顾了2017年6月至2023年4月期间LCS参与者的2968次低剂量基线胸部CT扫描。两名胸部放射科医师评估APCs的存在和类型,并评估间隔变化。我们还调查了APC的引入如何改变肺- rads分类。使用科恩卡帕系数评估观察者间的一致性。结果:在2968名参与者中(2900名男性,68名女性;中位年龄:61岁[IQR: 57-65]), 18例(0.6%)患有APCs。观察者间APC存在的一致性是公平的(κ = 0.33;95% ci: 0.07-0.44)。16例APC患者经ct随访(中位随访22个月),确诊肺癌3例(18.8%)。其余13个apc中,生长4个(30.8%),无变化7个(53.8%),壁厚减少2个(15.4%)。这13例未获得组织学证实,表明最低癌率为18.8%。APC的引入导致0.4%的参与者(12/2968)出现阳性结果变化,其中2例为肺癌。结论:APCs在LCS中少见,患病率仅为0.6%,但癌变率较高(18.8%)。虽然引入APC导致阳性筛查增加0.4%,但这被认为是可以接受的,因为它包括两例肺癌病例,强调了识别APC对早期肺癌检测的重要性。在LCS中检测到的APCs的患病率和临床意义是什么?它们如何影响诊断结果?研究结果:0.6%的参与者检测到apc,高癌率至少为18.8%,筛查阳性结果增加0.4%。LCS期间的临床相关性APCs虽然不常见,但由于其肺癌的高风险而至关重要。这加强了肺癌的早期发现,并改善了患者管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of fetal MRI data reveals no effect on liver maturation following prenatal alcohol exposure. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Shear-wave dispersion imaging in breast cancer: methodological considerations and future perspectives. Letter to the Editor: Shear-wave dispersion imaging in breast cancer: methodological considerations and future perspectives. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: A deep learning framework to stratify Nottingham histologic grade 2 breast tumors based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Beyond whole-image learning: anatomically partitioned deep learning models for superior sinonasal disease classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1