Prediction of thyroid malignancy risk using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning approach.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11434-2
Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Sarkhosh, Nooshin Shirzad, Mahdieh Taghvaei, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar, Sara Farhat, Hojat Ebrahiminik, Mahboobeh Hemmatabadi
{"title":"Prediction of thyroid malignancy risk using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning approach.","authors":"Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Sarkhosh, Nooshin Shirzad, Mahdieh Taghvaei, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar, Sara Farhat, Hojat Ebrahiminik, Mahboobeh Hemmatabadi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11434-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for thyroid nodule malignancy risks using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning (ML) approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study is based on the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of 1035 thyroid nodules (845 benign and 190 malignant) to develop and validate the risk prediction model. Employing multiple logistic regression, key features were selected in developing the model. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated for predicting the risks of malignancy. Finally, the predictive ability of the best-performing algorithm was compared against American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on AUC criteria (88.3, 95% CI: 81.2-94.2), sensitivity (84.2, 95% CI: 71.1-94.7), specificity (92.3, 95% CI: 88.2-95.9), positive predictive value, (71.4, 95% CI: 60.4-83.3) and negative predictive value (96.3, 95% CI: 93.5-98.8), the XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance over the other ML algorithms and ACR TI-RADS and ATA. These criteria were obtained for ACR TI-RADS at 54.2%, 63.2%, 48.5%, 21.1%, and 84.8%, while for ATA, they were 44.3%, 76.3%, 27.2%, 18.4%, and 81.6%. In addition, the unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rate with ACR TI-RADS and ATA was 43% and 63%, respectively-significantly higher than the 7% obtained with XGBoost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy risks as well as their potential benefits in optimizing healthcare resources by reducing unnecessary FNA rates. Using the proposed model through a web-based tool can facilitate clinical judgments in thyroid nodule management and personalized treatment.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Current risk assessment systems have limitations, with high unnecessary FNA rates compared to machine learning (ML) models. Findings The XGBoost algorithm was compared to other ML algorithms, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA and demonstrated superior performance. Clinical relevance This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy. The proposed web-based tool to facilitate the prediction of thyroid nodule risk is available at https://aimedlab.ir/tnr .</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11434-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for thyroid nodule malignancy risks using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning (ML) approach.

Methods: This retrospective study is based on the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of 1035 thyroid nodules (845 benign and 190 malignant) to develop and validate the risk prediction model. Employing multiple logistic regression, key features were selected in developing the model. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated for predicting the risks of malignancy. Finally, the predictive ability of the best-performing algorithm was compared against American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.

Results: Based on AUC criteria (88.3, 95% CI: 81.2-94.2), sensitivity (84.2, 95% CI: 71.1-94.7), specificity (92.3, 95% CI: 88.2-95.9), positive predictive value, (71.4, 95% CI: 60.4-83.3) and negative predictive value (96.3, 95% CI: 93.5-98.8), the XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance over the other ML algorithms and ACR TI-RADS and ATA. These criteria were obtained for ACR TI-RADS at 54.2%, 63.2%, 48.5%, 21.1%, and 84.8%, while for ATA, they were 44.3%, 76.3%, 27.2%, 18.4%, and 81.6%. In addition, the unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rate with ACR TI-RADS and ATA was 43% and 63%, respectively-significantly higher than the 7% obtained with XGBoost.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy risks as well as their potential benefits in optimizing healthcare resources by reducing unnecessary FNA rates. Using the proposed model through a web-based tool can facilitate clinical judgments in thyroid nodule management and personalized treatment.

Key points: Question Current risk assessment systems have limitations, with high unnecessary FNA rates compared to machine learning (ML) models. Findings The XGBoost algorithm was compared to other ML algorithms, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA and demonstrated superior performance. Clinical relevance This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy. The proposed web-based tool to facilitate the prediction of thyroid nodule risk is available at https://aimedlab.ir/tnr .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of thyroid malignancy risk using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning approach. Atypical pulmonary cysts in lung cancer screening: prevalence, outcomes, and clinical implications. Comparison of magnetocardiography and coronary computed tomographic angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis and the influence of calcium. CT radiomics-based intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity indicators for prognosis prediction in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CT-based detection of clinically significant portal hypertension predicts post-hepatectomy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1