Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Sarkhosh, Nooshin Shirzad, Mahdieh Taghvaei, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar, Sara Farhat, Hojat Ebrahiminik, Mahboobeh Hemmatabadi
{"title":"Prediction of thyroid malignancy risk using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning approach.","authors":"Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Sarkhosh, Nooshin Shirzad, Mahdieh Taghvaei, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar, Sara Farhat, Hojat Ebrahiminik, Mahboobeh Hemmatabadi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11434-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for thyroid nodule malignancy risks using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning (ML) approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study is based on the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of 1035 thyroid nodules (845 benign and 190 malignant) to develop and validate the risk prediction model. Employing multiple logistic regression, key features were selected in developing the model. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated for predicting the risks of malignancy. Finally, the predictive ability of the best-performing algorithm was compared against American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on AUC criteria (88.3, 95% CI: 81.2-94.2), sensitivity (84.2, 95% CI: 71.1-94.7), specificity (92.3, 95% CI: 88.2-95.9), positive predictive value, (71.4, 95% CI: 60.4-83.3) and negative predictive value (96.3, 95% CI: 93.5-98.8), the XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance over the other ML algorithms and ACR TI-RADS and ATA. These criteria were obtained for ACR TI-RADS at 54.2%, 63.2%, 48.5%, 21.1%, and 84.8%, while for ATA, they were 44.3%, 76.3%, 27.2%, 18.4%, and 81.6%. In addition, the unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rate with ACR TI-RADS and ATA was 43% and 63%, respectively-significantly higher than the 7% obtained with XGBoost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy risks as well as their potential benefits in optimizing healthcare resources by reducing unnecessary FNA rates. Using the proposed model through a web-based tool can facilitate clinical judgments in thyroid nodule management and personalized treatment.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Current risk assessment systems have limitations, with high unnecessary FNA rates compared to machine learning (ML) models. Findings The XGBoost algorithm was compared to other ML algorithms, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA and demonstrated superior performance. Clinical relevance This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy. The proposed web-based tool to facilitate the prediction of thyroid nodule risk is available at https://aimedlab.ir/tnr .</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11434-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for thyroid nodule malignancy risks using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning (ML) approach.
Methods: This retrospective study is based on the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of 1035 thyroid nodules (845 benign and 190 malignant) to develop and validate the risk prediction model. Employing multiple logistic regression, key features were selected in developing the model. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated for predicting the risks of malignancy. Finally, the predictive ability of the best-performing algorithm was compared against American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.
Results: Based on AUC criteria (88.3, 95% CI: 81.2-94.2), sensitivity (84.2, 95% CI: 71.1-94.7), specificity (92.3, 95% CI: 88.2-95.9), positive predictive value, (71.4, 95% CI: 60.4-83.3) and negative predictive value (96.3, 95% CI: 93.5-98.8), the XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance over the other ML algorithms and ACR TI-RADS and ATA. These criteria were obtained for ACR TI-RADS at 54.2%, 63.2%, 48.5%, 21.1%, and 84.8%, while for ATA, they were 44.3%, 76.3%, 27.2%, 18.4%, and 81.6%. In addition, the unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rate with ACR TI-RADS and ATA was 43% and 63%, respectively-significantly higher than the 7% obtained with XGBoost.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy risks as well as their potential benefits in optimizing healthcare resources by reducing unnecessary FNA rates. Using the proposed model through a web-based tool can facilitate clinical judgments in thyroid nodule management and personalized treatment.
Key points: Question Current risk assessment systems have limitations, with high unnecessary FNA rates compared to machine learning (ML) models. Findings The XGBoost algorithm was compared to other ML algorithms, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA and demonstrated superior performance. Clinical relevance This study demonstrated the capability of ML approaches in enhancing the accuracy of predicting thyroid malignancy. The proposed web-based tool to facilitate the prediction of thyroid nodule risk is available at https://aimedlab.ir/tnr .
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.