Development of computer adaptive tests to assess the psychological status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BioPsychoSocial Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s13030-025-00325-z
Takeshi Horie, Ken Kurisu, Shuji Inada, Kenshi Kawahara, Yutaka Matsuyama, Hiroe Kikuchi, Yoshiharu Yamamoto, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi
{"title":"Development of computer adaptive tests to assess the psychological status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Takeshi Horie, Ken Kurisu, Shuji Inada, Kenshi Kawahara, Yutaka Matsuyama, Hiroe Kikuchi, Yoshiharu Yamamoto, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi","doi":"10.1186/s13030-025-00325-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with type 2 diabetes and eating disorders must change their eating behaviors, which are often influenced by psychological factors like depression and anxiety. To efficiently assess daily psychological status, the present study aimed to develop computerized adaptive tests (CAT) based on item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, type 2 diabetes, and healthy persons participated in the study. Participants completed six questionnaires, including momentary and most recent one-week depression, anxiety, and positive affect. We selected items meeting the IRT assumptions, applied a graded response model, and conducted CAT simulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all six questionnaires, the CAT simulations used a smaller number of items and exhibited substantial Pearson's correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95 between simulated and full item-set mood status estimates. These estimated mood scores demonstrated satisfactory concurrent validity with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and sufficient discriminant validity between the clinical group and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that these scales offer efficient measurement of the mood status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-025-00325-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with type 2 diabetes and eating disorders must change their eating behaviors, which are often influenced by psychological factors like depression and anxiety. To efficiently assess daily psychological status, the present study aimed to develop computerized adaptive tests (CAT) based on item response theory (IRT).

Methods: Individuals with depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, type 2 diabetes, and healthy persons participated in the study. Participants completed six questionnaires, including momentary and most recent one-week depression, anxiety, and positive affect. We selected items meeting the IRT assumptions, applied a graded response model, and conducted CAT simulations.

Results: Across all six questionnaires, the CAT simulations used a smaller number of items and exhibited substantial Pearson's correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95 between simulated and full item-set mood status estimates. These estimated mood scores demonstrated satisfactory concurrent validity with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and sufficient discriminant validity between the clinical group and healthy controls.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that these scales offer efficient measurement of the mood status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展计算机适应性测试以评估饮食失调或2型糖尿病患者的心理状态。
背景:患有2型糖尿病和饮食失调的个体必须改变他们的饮食行为,这通常受到抑郁和焦虑等心理因素的影响。为了有效地评估日常心理状态,本研究旨在开发基于项目反应理论(IRT)的计算机化适应测验(CAT)。方法:抑郁症、焦虑症、饮食失调、2型糖尿病患者和健康人参与研究。参与者完成了六份调查问卷,包括短暂的和最近一周的抑郁、焦虑和积极情绪。我们选择符合IRT假设的项目,应用分级反应模型,并进行CAT模拟。结果:在所有六份问卷中,CAT模拟使用的项目数量较少,并且在模拟和完整项目集情绪状态估计之间显示出大量的Pearson相关系数超过0.95。这些估计的情绪得分与医院焦虑抑郁量表的并发效度令人满意,在临床组和健康对照组之间具有足够的区别效度。结论:这些发现表明,这些量表为饮食失调或2型糖尿病患者的情绪状态提供了有效的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
期刊最新文献
Communicative and critical health literacy and eating behaviors in Japanese adults predominantly over 40: the modifying role of body image distortion. Perceived social support and psychological resilience as mediators between social frailty and the frailty of older patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study. The effect of Baduanjin exercises on the functional capacity, respiratory function, and quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized controlled trial. Feasibility of the heaviness perception test as an assessment of interoception. Biopsychological pattern underlying the psychosomatic symptoms of patients with Hwabyung from a universal perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1