Mortality and sequelae associated with regional use of intracranial devices among patients with pneumococcal meningitis; a nationwide, population-based cohort study.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.015
Isabella L Platz, Malte M Tetens, Nanna S Andersen, Jacob Bodilsen, Ram B Dessau, Svend Ellermann-Eriksen, Jens K Møller, Lene Nielsen, Alex Christian Yde Nielsen, Kirstine K Søgaard, Christian Østergaard, Anne-Mette Lebech, Lars Haukali Omland, Niels Obel
{"title":"Mortality and sequelae associated with regional use of intracranial devices among patients with pneumococcal meningitis; a nationwide, population-based cohort study.","authors":"Isabella L Platz, Malte M Tetens, Nanna S Andersen, Jacob Bodilsen, Ram B Dessau, Svend Ellermann-Eriksen, Jens K Møller, Lene Nielsen, Alex Christian Yde Nielsen, Kirstine K Søgaard, Christian Østergaard, Anne-Mette Lebech, Lars Haukali Omland, Niels Obel","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intracranial devices may be used to treat or guide treatment of increased intracranial pressure in patients with pneumococcal meningitis. European guidelines do not recommend the routine use of intracranial devices in management of pneumococcal meningitis. However, in some countries, intracranial devices are used routinely, but the effect remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether mortality and sequelae were lower in patients with pneumococcal meningitis admitted to hospitals in regions in which intracranial devices were routinely used compared to regions not utilizing intracranial devices routinely in pneumococcal meningitis management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a registry-based, nationwide, population-based cohort study we examined patients with pneumococcal meningitis (Denmark, 2004-2021). Patients were categorized according to whether the individual was admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely (exposed patients, n=305 of whom 66 (22%) had an intracranial device) or not routinely used (non-exposed patients, n=333 of whom 4 (1%) had an intracranial devices). We used Cox-regression to calculate adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRR) and hazard ratios of sequelae for the short-term and long-term periods (<6 or ≥6 months after study inclusion).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The short-term cumulative incidence of death was 22% among exposed patients and 22% among non-exposed patients. We found no association between mortality and routine use of intracranial devices in the region in which patients with pneumococcal meningitis were admitted (short-term aMRR (95% confidence interval [95%CI]): 0.9 [0.6-1.3], long-term aMRR [95%CI]: 1.0 [0.7-1.6]). Furthermore, our study did not demonstrate lower risks of diagnosis of epilepsy, hearing loss, diagnoses suggestive of brain damage, disability pension, or shorter length of stay in exposed compared with non-exposed patients with pneumococcal meningitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The routine use of intracranial devices is not associated with lower mortality or morbidity among patients with pneumococcal meningitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Intracranial devices may be used to treat or guide treatment of increased intracranial pressure in patients with pneumococcal meningitis. European guidelines do not recommend the routine use of intracranial devices in management of pneumococcal meningitis. However, in some countries, intracranial devices are used routinely, but the effect remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether mortality and sequelae were lower in patients with pneumococcal meningitis admitted to hospitals in regions in which intracranial devices were routinely used compared to regions not utilizing intracranial devices routinely in pneumococcal meningitis management.

Methods: In a registry-based, nationwide, population-based cohort study we examined patients with pneumococcal meningitis (Denmark, 2004-2021). Patients were categorized according to whether the individual was admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely (exposed patients, n=305 of whom 66 (22%) had an intracranial device) or not routinely used (non-exposed patients, n=333 of whom 4 (1%) had an intracranial devices). We used Cox-regression to calculate adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRR) and hazard ratios of sequelae for the short-term and long-term periods (<6 or ≥6 months after study inclusion).

Results: The short-term cumulative incidence of death was 22% among exposed patients and 22% among non-exposed patients. We found no association between mortality and routine use of intracranial devices in the region in which patients with pneumococcal meningitis were admitted (short-term aMRR (95% confidence interval [95%CI]): 0.9 [0.6-1.3], long-term aMRR [95%CI]: 1.0 [0.7-1.6]). Furthermore, our study did not demonstrate lower risks of diagnosis of epilepsy, hearing loss, diagnoses suggestive of brain damage, disability pension, or shorter length of stay in exposed compared with non-exposed patients with pneumococcal meningitis.

Conclusions: The routine use of intracranial devices is not associated with lower mortality or morbidity among patients with pneumococcal meningitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Re: 'In vitro activity of cefepime-enmetazobactam on carbapenem resistant Gram negatives' by Bonnin et al. Revisiting diagnostics: Syndromic PCR-based testing beyond its approval and what we need instead. ORCHESTRA Delphi Consensus: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Disseminated Saccharomyces cerevisiae infection in advanced HIV: literature review. 'Marburg virus disease outbreak in Rwanda, 2024' - Author's reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1