Mortality and sequelae associated with regional use of intracranial devices among patients with pneumococcal meningitis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.015
Isabella L. Platz , Malte M. Tetens , Nanna S. Andersen , Jacob Bodilsen , Ram B. Dessau , Svend Ellermann-Eriksen , Jens K. Møller , Lene Nielsen , Alex Christian Yde Nielsen , Kirstine K. Søgaard , Christian Østergaard , Anne-Mette Lebech , Lars Haukali Omland , Niels Obel
{"title":"Mortality and sequelae associated with regional use of intracranial devices among patients with pneumococcal meningitis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study","authors":"Isabella L. Platz ,&nbsp;Malte M. Tetens ,&nbsp;Nanna S. Andersen ,&nbsp;Jacob Bodilsen ,&nbsp;Ram B. Dessau ,&nbsp;Svend Ellermann-Eriksen ,&nbsp;Jens K. Møller ,&nbsp;Lene Nielsen ,&nbsp;Alex Christian Yde Nielsen ,&nbsp;Kirstine K. Søgaard ,&nbsp;Christian Østergaard ,&nbsp;Anne-Mette Lebech ,&nbsp;Lars Haukali Omland ,&nbsp;Niels Obel","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Intracranial devices may be used to treat or guide the treatment of increased intracranial pressure in patients with pneumococcal meningitis. European guidelines do not recommend the routine use of intracranial devices in the management of pneumococcal meningitis. However, in some countries, intracranial devices are used routinely, but the effect remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether mortality and sequelae were lower in patients with pneumococcal meningitis admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely used compared with regions not utilizing intracranial devices routinely in pneumococcal meningitis management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a registry-based, nationwide, population-based cohort study, we examined patients with pneumococcal meningitis (Denmark, 2004–2021). Patients were categorized according to whether the individual was admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely (exposed patients, <em>n</em> = 305 of whom 66 (22%) had an intracranial device) or not routinely used (non-exposed patients, <em>n</em> = 333 of whom 4 (1%) had intracranial devices). We used Cox regression to calculate adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRR) and hazard ratios of sequelae for the short-term and long-term periods (&lt;6 or ≥6 months after study inclusion).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The short-term cumulative incidence of death was 22% among exposed patients and 22% among non-exposed patients. We found no association between mortality and routine use of intracranial devices in the region in which patients with pneumococcal meningitis were admitted (short-term aMRR [95% CI], 0.9 [0.6–1.3]; long-term aMRR [95% CI], 1.0 [0.7–1.6]). Furthermore, our study did not demonstrate lower risks of diagnosis of epilepsy, hearing loss, diagnoses suggestive of brain damage, disability pension, or shorter length of stay in exposed compared with non-exposed patients with pneumococcal meningitis.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The routine use of intracranial devices is not associated with lower mortality or morbidity among patients with pneumococcal meningitis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 979-986"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X25000746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Intracranial devices may be used to treat or guide the treatment of increased intracranial pressure in patients with pneumococcal meningitis. European guidelines do not recommend the routine use of intracranial devices in the management of pneumococcal meningitis. However, in some countries, intracranial devices are used routinely, but the effect remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether mortality and sequelae were lower in patients with pneumococcal meningitis admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely used compared with regions not utilizing intracranial devices routinely in pneumococcal meningitis management.

Methods

In a registry-based, nationwide, population-based cohort study, we examined patients with pneumococcal meningitis (Denmark, 2004–2021). Patients were categorized according to whether the individual was admitted to hospitals in regions where intracranial devices were routinely (exposed patients, n = 305 of whom 66 (22%) had an intracranial device) or not routinely used (non-exposed patients, n = 333 of whom 4 (1%) had intracranial devices). We used Cox regression to calculate adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRR) and hazard ratios of sequelae for the short-term and long-term periods (<6 or ≥6 months after study inclusion).

Results

The short-term cumulative incidence of death was 22% among exposed patients and 22% among non-exposed patients. We found no association between mortality and routine use of intracranial devices in the region in which patients with pneumococcal meningitis were admitted (short-term aMRR [95% CI], 0.9 [0.6–1.3]; long-term aMRR [95% CI], 1.0 [0.7–1.6]). Furthermore, our study did not demonstrate lower risks of diagnosis of epilepsy, hearing loss, diagnoses suggestive of brain damage, disability pension, or shorter length of stay in exposed compared with non-exposed patients with pneumococcal meningitis.

Discussion

The routine use of intracranial devices is not associated with lower mortality or morbidity among patients with pneumococcal meningitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺炎球菌性脑膜炎患者局部使用颅内装置的死亡率和后遗症一项全国性的、以人群为基础的队列研究。
目的:颅内装置可用于治疗或指导治疗肺炎球菌性脑膜炎患者颅内压增高。欧洲指南不建议常规使用颅内装置治疗肺炎球菌性脑膜炎。然而,在一些国家,常规使用颅内装置,但效果尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究在常规使用颅内装置的地区住院的肺炎球菌脑膜炎患者的死亡率和后遗症是否比在常规使用颅内装置的地区住院的肺炎球菌脑膜炎患者低。方法:在一项基于登记的、全国性的、基于人群的队列研究中,我们检查了肺炎球菌性脑膜炎患者(丹麦,2004-2021)。根据患者是否入住常规使用颅内装置的地区的医院(暴露患者,n=305,其中66例(22%)使用颅内装置)或不常规使用(未暴露患者,n=333,其中4例(1%)使用颅内装置)对患者进行分类。我们使用cox回归计算短期和长期的调整死亡率比(aMRR)和后遗症的风险比(结果:暴露患者的短期累积死亡率为22%,未暴露患者的短期累积死亡率为22%)。我们发现,在肺炎球菌脑膜炎患者入院的地区,死亡率与常规使用颅内装置之间没有关联(短期aMRR(95%可信区间[95% ci]): 0.9[0.6-1.3],长期aMRR [95% ci]: 1.0[0.7-1.6])。此外,我们的研究并没有证明与未暴露的肺炎球菌脑膜炎患者相比,暴露的患者癫痫、听力损失、脑损伤诊断、残疾抚恤金的诊断风险更低,或住院时间更短。结论:常规使用颅内装置与肺炎球菌脑膜炎患者较低的死亡率或发病率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Aspergillus and host-pathogen interaction: focus on treatment-relevant aspects Disseminated Fusarium solani complex infection with ocular involvement in a leukaemia patient Estimating the potential economic and health impact of integrated genomic surveillance in a hospital setting Laboratory innovations to diagnose invasive mould infections—what is relevant, what is not? The changing epidemiology of invasive mould diseases in immunosuppressed patients: what, why, how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1