Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Step Forward in Inpatient Glycemic Control.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.02.007
Alejandra Rivas-Montenegro, Roberto Añez-Ramos, Pastor Galdón-Sanz, Olga González-Albarrán
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Step Forward in Inpatient Glycemic Control.","authors":"Alejandra Rivas-Montenegro, Roberto Añez-Ramos, Pastor Galdón-Sanz, Olga González-Albarrán","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect and safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) use in glycemic control compared to standard approach in hospitalized patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 37 hospitalized patients with T2D admitted in medical and surgical wards. All patients used CGM (Abbott FreeStyle2 or FreeStyle3) and concomitantly 6-point point of care glucose (POCG). In group A (n=19), daily CGM profiles, alarms, and trend arrows were considered for glycemic therapeutic decisions and in group B (n=18) were based on POCG. Primary outcomes included the difference in time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL, hospital glycemia risk index (GRI), time below range (TBR) measured as the percentage below 70 mg/dL and below 54 mg/dL, and time above range (TAR) measured as the percentage above 180 mg/dL and above 250 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TIR was higher in group A: 78.26±10.83% vs. 67.39±19.13% p=0.04. TAR level 1 in group A: 14.37±8.33% vs. group B: 23.28±16.62% p=0.04. Asymptomatic hypoglycemic events were more detected by CGM-group (1.65±2.03 vs. 0.31±0.60 p=0.01). Overall MARD: 14.7%. DTS Error Grid: 69.5% zone A and 29.3% zone B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of CGM in hospitals could represent a significant advancement in diabetes management, offering a more comprehensive and dynamic approach to monitoring glucose levels. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts of CGM on clinical outcomes and to optimize its integration into hospital protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2025.02.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect and safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) use in glycemic control compared to standard approach in hospitalized patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D).

Methods: This was a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 37 hospitalized patients with T2D admitted in medical and surgical wards. All patients used CGM (Abbott FreeStyle2 or FreeStyle3) and concomitantly 6-point point of care glucose (POCG). In group A (n=19), daily CGM profiles, alarms, and trend arrows were considered for glycemic therapeutic decisions and in group B (n=18) were based on POCG. Primary outcomes included the difference in time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL, hospital glycemia risk index (GRI), time below range (TBR) measured as the percentage below 70 mg/dL and below 54 mg/dL, and time above range (TAR) measured as the percentage above 180 mg/dL and above 250 mg/dL.

Results: TIR was higher in group A: 78.26±10.83% vs. 67.39±19.13% p=0.04. TAR level 1 in group A: 14.37±8.33% vs. group B: 23.28±16.62% p=0.04. Asymptomatic hypoglycemic events were more detected by CGM-group (1.65±2.03 vs. 0.31±0.60 p=0.01). Overall MARD: 14.7%. DTS Error Grid: 69.5% zone A and 29.3% zone B.

Conclusions: The implementation of CGM in hospitals could represent a significant advancement in diabetes management, offering a more comprehensive and dynamic approach to monitoring glucose levels. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts of CGM on clinical outcomes and to optimize its integration into hospital protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
期刊最新文献
Under-resourced youth with diabetes in a community-based intervention show improved diabetes outcomes, technology use, and psychosocial functioning. Corrigendum to "Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Reduce the Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Amputation Rate Compared With Incretin-Based Therapy in Patients With Diabetic Foot Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study" [Endocrine Practice 30 (2024) 424-430]. Delivery Mode and Neonatal Thyrotropin Levels: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Step Forward in Inpatient Glycemic Control. Efficacy and Safety of Teprotumumab in Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1