Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer stadification by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
Blanca Valenzuela-Méndez, Enrica Bentivegna, Anne-Sophie Bats, Henri Azaïs
{"title":"Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer stadification by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.","authors":"Blanca Valenzuela-Méndez, Enrica Bentivegna, Anne-Sophie Bats, Henri Azaïs","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant global health concern. Early detection remains rare, with only 20% of cases identified at an early stage, highlighting the critical need for effective staging interventions<sup>1</sup>. Traditional extensive lymphadenectomy, associated with considerable morbidity, has led to the exploration of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which is still under study <sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SLNB, enhanced by robotic technology, is demonstrated through two clinical case studies studies that show how robotic systems are used to meticulously identify and map sentinel nodes, focusing on procedural specifics and fluorescence-guided node identification. The article synthesizes insights from recent studies<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup>, emphasizing the integration of robotic technology with SLNB to enhance surgical precision, improve recovery, and reduce morbidity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We examine SLNB through retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, highlighting technical aspects and the benefits of robotic assistance over conventional laparoscopy, such as improved precision and ergonomics. A recent analysis and meta-analysis<sup>1</sup> showed a high pooled detection rate, though the evidence quality is low. Recently, the MELISA<sup>3</sup> and SELLY<sup>2</sup> studies were published, with MELISA showing higher detection, sensitivity, and specificity rates than SELLY. Sentinel lymph nodes vary in location, requiring meticulous exploration<sup>1</sup>. The retroperitoneal approach might offer an advantage for para-aortic dissection, particularly in obese patients, however, in sentinel lymph node biopsy, the need for extensive dissection could potentially limit its use<sup>5</sup>. Key technique aspects include injection zones and using combined tracers<sup>2</sup>. Limitations include variable detection rates, lack of standardized protocols, accessibility to robotic technology, and the need for advanced surgical skills<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLNB, particularly with robotic assistance, shows promise for improving accuracy and reducing morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer. However, its use remains limited to clinical trials. Future studies should focus on developing standardized protocols to achieve consistent results and provide sufficient evidence for its integration into routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant global health concern. Early detection remains rare, with only 20% of cases identified at an early stage, highlighting the critical need for effective staging interventions1. Traditional extensive lymphadenectomy, associated with considerable morbidity, has led to the exploration of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which is still under study 1,2,3,4.
Methods: SLNB, enhanced by robotic technology, is demonstrated through two clinical case studies studies that show how robotic systems are used to meticulously identify and map sentinel nodes, focusing on procedural specifics and fluorescence-guided node identification. The article synthesizes insights from recent studies1,2,3,4, emphasizing the integration of robotic technology with SLNB to enhance surgical precision, improve recovery, and reduce morbidity.
Discussion: We examine SLNB through retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, highlighting technical aspects and the benefits of robotic assistance over conventional laparoscopy, such as improved precision and ergonomics. A recent analysis and meta-analysis1 showed a high pooled detection rate, though the evidence quality is low. Recently, the MELISA3 and SELLY2 studies were published, with MELISA showing higher detection, sensitivity, and specificity rates than SELLY. Sentinel lymph nodes vary in location, requiring meticulous exploration1. The retroperitoneal approach might offer an advantage for para-aortic dissection, particularly in obese patients, however, in sentinel lymph node biopsy, the need for extensive dissection could potentially limit its use5. Key technique aspects include injection zones and using combined tracers2. Limitations include variable detection rates, lack of standardized protocols, accessibility to robotic technology, and the need for advanced surgical skills1.
Conclusion: SLNB, particularly with robotic assistance, shows promise for improving accuracy and reducing morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer. However, its use remains limited to clinical trials. Future studies should focus on developing standardized protocols to achieve consistent results and provide sufficient evidence for its integration into routine clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.