Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer stadification by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.017
Blanca Valenzuela-Méndez, Enrica Bentivegna, Anne-Sophie Bats, Henri Azaïs
{"title":"Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer stadification by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.","authors":"Blanca Valenzuela-Méndez, Enrica Bentivegna, Anne-Sophie Bats, Henri Azaïs","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant global health concern. Early detection remains rare, with only 20% of cases identified at an early stage, highlighting the critical need for effective staging interventions<sup>1</sup>. Traditional extensive lymphadenectomy, associated with considerable morbidity, has led to the exploration of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which is still under study <sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SLNB, enhanced by robotic technology, is demonstrated through two clinical case studies studies that show how robotic systems are used to meticulously identify and map sentinel nodes, focusing on procedural specifics and fluorescence-guided node identification. The article synthesizes insights from recent studies<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup>, emphasizing the integration of robotic technology with SLNB to enhance surgical precision, improve recovery, and reduce morbidity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We examine SLNB through retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, highlighting technical aspects and the benefits of robotic assistance over conventional laparoscopy, such as improved precision and ergonomics. A recent analysis and meta-analysis<sup>1</sup> showed a high pooled detection rate, though the evidence quality is low. Recently, the MELISA<sup>3</sup> and SELLY<sup>2</sup> studies were published, with MELISA showing higher detection, sensitivity, and specificity rates than SELLY. Sentinel lymph nodes vary in location, requiring meticulous exploration<sup>1</sup>. The retroperitoneal approach might offer an advantage for para-aortic dissection, particularly in obese patients, however, in sentinel lymph node biopsy, the need for extensive dissection could potentially limit its use<sup>5</sup>. Key technique aspects include injection zones and using combined tracers<sup>2</sup>. Limitations include variable detection rates, lack of standardized protocols, accessibility to robotic technology, and the need for advanced surgical skills<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLNB, particularly with robotic assistance, shows promise for improving accuracy and reducing morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer. However, its use remains limited to clinical trials. Future studies should focus on developing standardized protocols to achieve consistent results and provide sufficient evidence for its integration into routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant global health concern. Early detection remains rare, with only 20% of cases identified at an early stage, highlighting the critical need for effective staging interventions1. Traditional extensive lymphadenectomy, associated with considerable morbidity, has led to the exploration of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which is still under study 1,2,3,4.

Methods: SLNB, enhanced by robotic technology, is demonstrated through two clinical case studies studies that show how robotic systems are used to meticulously identify and map sentinel nodes, focusing on procedural specifics and fluorescence-guided node identification. The article synthesizes insights from recent studies1,2,3,4, emphasizing the integration of robotic technology with SLNB to enhance surgical precision, improve recovery, and reduce morbidity.

Discussion: We examine SLNB through retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, highlighting technical aspects and the benefits of robotic assistance over conventional laparoscopy, such as improved precision and ergonomics. A recent analysis and meta-analysis1 showed a high pooled detection rate, though the evidence quality is low. Recently, the MELISA3 and SELLY2 studies were published, with MELISA showing higher detection, sensitivity, and specificity rates than SELLY. Sentinel lymph nodes vary in location, requiring meticulous exploration1. The retroperitoneal approach might offer an advantage for para-aortic dissection, particularly in obese patients, however, in sentinel lymph node biopsy, the need for extensive dissection could potentially limit its use5. Key technique aspects include injection zones and using combined tracers2. Limitations include variable detection rates, lack of standardized protocols, accessibility to robotic technology, and the need for advanced surgical skills1.

Conclusion: SLNB, particularly with robotic assistance, shows promise for improving accuracy and reducing morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer. However, its use remains limited to clinical trials. Future studies should focus on developing standardized protocols to achieve consistent results and provide sufficient evidence for its integration into routine clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)是全球关注的重大健康问题。早期发现的病例仍然很少,只有 20% 的病例在早期阶段被发现,这凸显了对有效分期干预措施的迫切需要1。传统的广泛淋巴结切除术会导致相当高的发病率,因此人们开始探索选择性前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),目前仍在研究中1,2,3,4:本文通过两个临床病例研究,展示了如何利用机器人系统细致识别和绘制前哨淋巴结活检图,重点介绍了手术的具体细节和荧光引导下的淋巴结识别。文章综合了近期研究的观点1,2,3,4,强调机器人技术与 SLNB 的整合可提高手术精确度、改善恢复和降低发病率:讨论:我们研究了通过腹膜后和经腹膜入路进行的 SLNB,强调了技术方面的问题以及与传统腹腔镜相比机器人辅助的优势,如提高精确度和人体工程学。最近的一项分析和荟萃分析1 显示,虽然证据质量不高,但总检出率很高。最近发表的 MELISA3 和 SELLY2 研究显示,MELISA 的检出率、灵敏度和特异性均高于 SELLY。前哨淋巴结的位置各不相同,需要仔细探查1。腹膜后方法可能在主动脉旁清扫方面具有优势,尤其是在肥胖患者中,但在前哨淋巴结活检中,需要进行广泛清扫可能会限制其使用5。关键技术包括注射区和使用联合示踪剂2。局限性包括检出率不一、缺乏标准化方案、机器人技术的可及性以及对高级外科技能的需求1:SLNB,尤其是在机器人辅助下,有望提高上皮性卵巢癌的准确性并降低发病率。然而,其应用仍仅限于临床试验。未来的研究应侧重于制定标准化方案,以获得一致的结果,并为将其纳入常规临床实践提供充足的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
DIAGNOSIS AND LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF INTRAHEPATIC ENDOMETRIOMA. Laparoscopic Management of Giant Hydrosalpinx in a Nulliparous Woman. Robotic Exploration and Suture Removal following Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension. Laparoscopic Reduction of Non-gravid Hemi-uterine Inversion following C-section from the Contralateral Didelphic Uterus. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Using Retroperitoneal Tunneling Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1