Patient-Reported Outcomes With Focus on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated With Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2025.01.010
Haya H R Al-Bayyati, Gert-Jan Hassing, Egbert P van der Hoeve, Laurens Koppendraaier, Maurits H T de Ruiter
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes With Focus on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated With Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Haya H R Al-Bayyati, Gert-Jan Hassing, Egbert P van der Hoeve, Laurens Koppendraaier, Maurits H T de Ruiter","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has shown to be effective according to objective measures; however, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), especially health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are also crucial but have not been systematically assessed in relation to MMA surgery for OSA yet. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a systematic review on the effect of MMA surgery on PROMs focusing on HRQoL in patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines with a literature search performed in PubMed and Medline to identify relevant studies from database inception to May 2024 evaluating PROMs focusing on HRQoL in adult OSA patients treated with MMA surgery. The primary variables are the PROMs outcomes. Screening and eligibility assessments were carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis framework, and study quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. The data extraction for the meta-analysis included PROMs outcomes and was carried out in SPSS using a fixed-effects model to report effect sizes as mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were screened of which 12 were included in this systematic review encompassing 317 patients. The studies reported PROMs in a heterogeneous manner, but MMA consistently showed an improvement postoperatively in mean differences. In the most used PROMs instruments MMA surgery was associated with a 5.35-point improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (95% CI -6.57 to -4.14; Z = -8.62; P < .001), a 3.96-point improvement on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (95% CI 3.11, 4.80; Z = 11.60; P < .001) and an improvement in all domains of the Short Form 36 Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMA surgery for patients with OSA shows significant improvements in PROMs related to quality of life. The PROMs are positive, demonstrating satisfaction across various domains. This indicates that MMA surgery is well received by patients and results in clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs related to HRQoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.01.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has shown to be effective according to objective measures; however, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), especially health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are also crucial but have not been systematically assessed in relation to MMA surgery for OSA yet. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a systematic review on the effect of MMA surgery on PROMs focusing on HRQoL in patients with OSA.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines with a literature search performed in PubMed and Medline to identify relevant studies from database inception to May 2024 evaluating PROMs focusing on HRQoL in adult OSA patients treated with MMA surgery. The primary variables are the PROMs outcomes. Screening and eligibility assessments were carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis framework, and study quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. The data extraction for the meta-analysis included PROMs outcomes and was carried out in SPSS using a fixed-effects model to report effect sizes as mean differences.

Results: Thirty-three studies were screened of which 12 were included in this systematic review encompassing 317 patients. The studies reported PROMs in a heterogeneous manner, but MMA consistently showed an improvement postoperatively in mean differences. In the most used PROMs instruments MMA surgery was associated with a 5.35-point improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (95% CI -6.57 to -4.14; Z = -8.62; P < .001), a 3.96-point improvement on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (95% CI 3.11, 4.80; Z = 11.60; P < .001) and an improvement in all domains of the Short Form 36 Health Survey.

Conclusion: MMA surgery for patients with OSA shows significant improvements in PROMs related to quality of life. The PROMs are positive, demonstrating satisfaction across various domains. This indicates that MMA surgery is well received by patients and results in clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs related to HRQoL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Lip Revision Rates in Traditional Versus Early Cleft Lip Repair: An Institutional Review. Is A Surgeon's Self-Perceived Level of Anxiety Associated With the Type of Surgical Procedure Being Performed? Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1