Monitoring Immunohistochemical Staining Variations Using Artificial Intelligence on Standardized Controls

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104105
Sven van Kempen, W.J. Ghlowy Gerritsen, Tri Q. Nguyen, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Nikolas Stathonikos, Roel Broekhuizen, Loïs Peters, Paul J. van Diest
{"title":"Monitoring Immunohistochemical Staining Variations Using Artificial Intelligence on Standardized Controls","authors":"Sven van Kempen,&nbsp;W.J. Ghlowy Gerritsen,&nbsp;Tri Q. Nguyen,&nbsp;Carmen van Dooijeweert,&nbsp;Nikolas Stathonikos,&nbsp;Roel Broekhuizen,&nbsp;Loïs Peters,&nbsp;Paul J. van Diest","doi":"10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quality control of immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides is crucial to ascertain accurate patient management. Visual assessment is the most commonly used method to assess the quality of IHC slides from patient samples in daily pathology routines. Control tissues for IHC slides are typically obtained from prior cases containing normal tissues or specific antigen-expressing disease samples, especially tumors. As such samples eventually run out, and tumors may be heterogeneous, constant expression levels from one control sample to the next cannot be guaranteed. With the increasing availability of standardized cell lines, the diagnostic use of these cell lines as alternatives to traditional laboratory-derived controls can be explored. Furthermore, stain quality of this cell line material can probably be better monitored with readout methods such as image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) than with visual readout methods, in which accuracy is influenced by the training and experience of the pathologists and technicians. In this study, we present the results of our investigation into AI-measured stain quality of standardized cell lines designed as controls for HER2 and PD-L1 IHC stainings. Using 5 IHC autostainers from the same manufacturer and type, we quantified cell membrane expression levels of these cell lines after staining using Qualitopix, an AI algorithm for measuring stain quality control. Over a 24-month period of weekly AI measurements, we observed multiple unexpected variations, particularly in low- and medium-expressing cell lines. To further investigate these fluctuations, we assessed both interstainer variations and intrarun variations, revealing differences between the stainers and the slide slots within the stainers. To finalize our study, we performed HER2 and PD-L1 stainings on calibrator slides to measure the limit of detection to detect variance per stainer and slot. Our findings prompted extra maintenance from the manufacturer in one of the highly fluctuating stainers, which reduced variation. In conclusion, AI appears to be an effective approach to monitor the IHC stain quality of standardized control cell lines for therapeutic protein targets HER2 and PD-L1, and to trace the underlying errors. This may be crucial for accurate patient management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17930,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Investigation","volume":"105 5","pages":"Article 104105"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023683725000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality control of immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides is crucial to ascertain accurate patient management. Visual assessment is the most commonly used method to assess the quality of IHC slides from patient samples in daily pathology routines. Control tissues for IHC slides are typically obtained from prior cases containing normal tissues or specific antigen-expressing disease samples, especially tumors. As such samples eventually run out, and tumors may be heterogeneous, constant expression levels from one control sample to the next cannot be guaranteed. With the increasing availability of standardized cell lines, the diagnostic use of these cell lines as alternatives to traditional laboratory-derived controls can be explored. Furthermore, stain quality of this cell line material can probably be better monitored with readout methods such as image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) than with visual readout methods, in which accuracy is influenced by the training and experience of the pathologists and technicians. In this study, we present the results of our investigation into AI-measured stain quality of standardized cell lines designed as controls for HER2 and PD-L1 IHC stainings. Using 5 IHC autostainers from the same manufacturer and type, we quantified cell membrane expression levels of these cell lines after staining using Qualitopix, an AI algorithm for measuring stain quality control. Over a 24-month period of weekly AI measurements, we observed multiple unexpected variations, particularly in low- and medium-expressing cell lines. To further investigate these fluctuations, we assessed both interstainer variations and intrarun variations, revealing differences between the stainers and the slide slots within the stainers. To finalize our study, we performed HER2 and PD-L1 stainings on calibrator slides to measure the limit of detection to detect variance per stainer and slot. Our findings prompted extra maintenance from the manufacturer in one of the highly fluctuating stainers, which reduced variation. In conclusion, AI appears to be an effective approach to monitor the IHC stain quality of standardized control cell lines for therapeutic protein targets HER2 and PD-L1, and to trace the underlying errors. This may be crucial for accurate patient management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能监测标准化对照的免疫组织化学染色变化。
免疫组织化学(IHC)玻片的质量控制是确定准确的病人管理的关键。在日常病理检查中,目视评估是最常用的评估患者样本免疫组化玻片质量的方法。免疫组化载玻片的对照组织通常来自先前含有正常组织或表达特定抗原的疾病样本的病例,特别是肿瘤。由于这些样本最终会用完,而且肿瘤可能是异质的,因此不能保证从一个对照样本到下一个对照样本的恒定表达水平。随着标准化细胞系可用性的增加,可以探索这些细胞系作为传统实验室衍生对照的替代品的诊断效用。此外,使用图像分析和人工智能(AI)等读出方法可能比使用视觉读出方法更好地监测该细胞系材料的染色质量,视觉读出方法的准确性受到病理学家和技术人员的培训和经验的影响。在这项研究中,我们展示了我们对人工智能测量的标准化细胞系的染色质量的调查结果,这些细胞系被设计为HER2和PD-L1 IHC染色的对照。使用来自同一制造商和类型的5台IHC自动染色机,我们使用Qualitopix™(一种用于测量染色质量控制的人工智能算法)定量染色后这些细胞系的细胞膜表达水平。在为期24个月的每周AI测量期间,我们观察到多种意想不到的变化,特别是在低表达和中表达细胞系中。为了进一步研究这些波动,我们评估了染色组间的变化和组内的变化,揭示了染色组和染色组内载玻片槽之间的差异。为了完成我们的研究,我们在校准载玻片上进行了HER2和PD-L1染色,以测量检测极限,以检测每个染色器和槽的方差。我们的发现促使制造商对其中一种高度波动的染色机进行额外的维护,从而减少了变化。总之,人工智能似乎是一种有效的方法来监测标准化对照细胞系的治疗性蛋白靶点HER2和PD-L1的免疫组织化学染色质量,并追踪潜在的错误。这可能对准确的患者管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Investigation
Laboratory Investigation 医学-病理学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Laboratory Investigation is an international journal owned by the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Laboratory Investigation offers prompt publication of high-quality original research in all biomedical disciplines relating to the understanding of human disease and the application of new methods to the diagnosis of disease. Both human and experimental studies are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Human Studies Using Archival Tissue Programmed Death Ligand-1 Testing in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: National Practice and Interlaboratory Variation in the Netherlands Comprehensive Assessment of Artificial Intelligence as a Stand-alone tool for Cervical Cancer Screening Using a 50% Negative Cutoff Value. POU2F3 in SCLC: Diagnostic Utility in Neuroendocrine Low/Negative SCLC and Discrimination From Other Thoracic Malignancies and Other Small Blue Round Cell Tumors. ARHGEF26 Maintains SOX2 Stability by Inhibiting Ubiquitination to Enhance Glioblastoma Stemness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1