Sven van Kempen, W J Ghlowy Gerritsen, Tri Q Nguyen, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Nikolas Stathonikos, Roel Broekhuizen, Loïs Peters, Paul J van Diest
{"title":"Monitoring immunohistochemical staining variations by artificial intelligence on standardized controls.","authors":"Sven van Kempen, W J Ghlowy Gerritsen, Tri Q Nguyen, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Nikolas Stathonikos, Roel Broekhuizen, Loïs Peters, Paul J van Diest","doi":"10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality control of immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides is crucial to ascertain accurate patient management. Visual assessment is the most commonly used method to assess the quality of IHC slides from patient samples in daily pathology routines. Control tissues for IHC slides are typically obtained from prior cases containing normal tissues or specific antigen-expressing disease samples, especially tumors. Since such samples eventually run out, and tumors may be heterogeneous, constant expression levels from one control sample to the next cannot be guaranteed. With the increasing availability of standardized cell lines, the diagnostic utility of these cell lines as alternatives to traditional laboratory-derived controls can be explored. Further, stain quality of this cell line material can probably be better monitored with readout methods such as image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) than with visual readout methods, where accuracy is influenced by the training and experience of the pathologists and technicians. In this study, we present the results of our investigation into AI-measured stain quality of standardized cell lines designed as controls for HER2 and PD-L1 IHC stainings. Using five IHC autostainers from the same manufacturer and type, we quantified cell membrane expression levels of these cell lines after staining using Qualitopix™, an AI algorithm for measuring stain quality control. Over a 24-month period of weekly AI measurements, we observed multiple unexpected variations, particularly in low and medium-expressing cell lines. To further investigate these fluctuations, we assessed both inter-stainer variation and intra-run variations, revealing differences between the stainers and the slide slots within the stainers. To finalize our study, we performed HER2 and PD-L1 stainings on calibrator slides to measure limit of detection to detect variance per stainer and slot. Our findings prompted extra maintenance from the manufacturer in one of the highly fluctuating stainers, which reduced variation. In conclusion, AI appears to be an effective approach to monitor immunohistochemical stain quality of standardized control cell lines for therapeutic protein targets HER2 and PD-L1, and to trace the underlying errors. This may be crucial for accurate patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17930,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"104105"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quality control of immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides is crucial to ascertain accurate patient management. Visual assessment is the most commonly used method to assess the quality of IHC slides from patient samples in daily pathology routines. Control tissues for IHC slides are typically obtained from prior cases containing normal tissues or specific antigen-expressing disease samples, especially tumors. Since such samples eventually run out, and tumors may be heterogeneous, constant expression levels from one control sample to the next cannot be guaranteed. With the increasing availability of standardized cell lines, the diagnostic utility of these cell lines as alternatives to traditional laboratory-derived controls can be explored. Further, stain quality of this cell line material can probably be better monitored with readout methods such as image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) than with visual readout methods, where accuracy is influenced by the training and experience of the pathologists and technicians. In this study, we present the results of our investigation into AI-measured stain quality of standardized cell lines designed as controls for HER2 and PD-L1 IHC stainings. Using five IHC autostainers from the same manufacturer and type, we quantified cell membrane expression levels of these cell lines after staining using Qualitopix™, an AI algorithm for measuring stain quality control. Over a 24-month period of weekly AI measurements, we observed multiple unexpected variations, particularly in low and medium-expressing cell lines. To further investigate these fluctuations, we assessed both inter-stainer variation and intra-run variations, revealing differences between the stainers and the slide slots within the stainers. To finalize our study, we performed HER2 and PD-L1 stainings on calibrator slides to measure limit of detection to detect variance per stainer and slot. Our findings prompted extra maintenance from the manufacturer in one of the highly fluctuating stainers, which reduced variation. In conclusion, AI appears to be an effective approach to monitor immunohistochemical stain quality of standardized control cell lines for therapeutic protein targets HER2 and PD-L1, and to trace the underlying errors. This may be crucial for accurate patient management.
期刊介绍:
Laboratory Investigation is an international journal owned by the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Laboratory Investigation offers prompt publication of high-quality original research in all biomedical disciplines relating to the understanding of human disease and the application of new methods to the diagnosis of disease. Both human and experimental studies are welcome.