Diagnostic FNA biopsies of palpable lesions without ultrasound guidance: a single-center study and narrative review of the literature.

Bárbara Sepodes, Vânia Almeida
{"title":"Diagnostic FNA biopsies of palpable lesions without ultrasound guidance: a single-center study and narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Bárbara Sepodes, Vânia Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies suggest that ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (iFNAb) enhances diagnostic accuracy for palpable lesions. This study evaluates the efficacy of palpation-guided FNAb (pFNAb) performed at Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, Portugal, compares findings to existing literature, and identifies lesions that could benefit from ultrasound guidance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 278 pFNAb cases from 2021 to 2023 was conducted, collecting data on lesion characteristics, procedural details, and operator expertise. Diagnostic accuracy was determined through concordance with histopathology, flow cytometry, or clinical follow-up. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature review was also performed to contextualize findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy was achieved in 84% of pFNAb cases. Lesions less than 1 cm exhibited significantly lower diagnostic rates compared to larger lesions. Diagnostic accuracy improved with additional needle passes, reaching 87% with 3 attempts. Anatomical location significantly influenced outcomes, with scalp lesions having the lowest diagnostic rate (33%) compared to skin and soft tissue lesions (85.7%). Literature review findings corroborated the data, emphasizing the superior accuracy of iFNAb for smaller or anatomically challenging lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>pFNAb is effective for diagnosing most palpable lesions and provides a standard of care in settings without imaging resources. However, iFNAb is recommended for specific cases, such as small or scalp lesions, to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Tailoring biopsy approaches based on lesion characteristics can improve outcomes, reduce repeat procedures, and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies suggest that ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (iFNAb) enhances diagnostic accuracy for palpable lesions. This study evaluates the efficacy of palpation-guided FNAb (pFNAb) performed at Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, Portugal, compares findings to existing literature, and identifies lesions that could benefit from ultrasound guidance.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 278 pFNAb cases from 2021 to 2023 was conducted, collecting data on lesion characteristics, procedural details, and operator expertise. Diagnostic accuracy was determined through concordance with histopathology, flow cytometry, or clinical follow-up. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature review was also performed to contextualize findings.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy was achieved in 84% of pFNAb cases. Lesions less than 1 cm exhibited significantly lower diagnostic rates compared to larger lesions. Diagnostic accuracy improved with additional needle passes, reaching 87% with 3 attempts. Anatomical location significantly influenced outcomes, with scalp lesions having the lowest diagnostic rate (33%) compared to skin and soft tissue lesions (85.7%). Literature review findings corroborated the data, emphasizing the superior accuracy of iFNAb for smaller or anatomically challenging lesions.

Conclusions: pFNAb is effective for diagnosing most palpable lesions and provides a standard of care in settings without imaging resources. However, iFNAb is recommended for specific cases, such as small or scalp lesions, to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Tailoring biopsy approaches based on lesion characteristics can improve outcomes, reduce repeat procedures, and enhance patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
ROSE on small-cell lung carcinoma involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes: Performance evaluation at our institution. Diagnostic FNA biopsies of palpable lesions without ultrasound guidance: a single-center study and narrative review of the literature. Diagnostic performance of the hologic genius digital diagnostics system for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) ThinPrep papanicolaou tests. Evaluation of HER2-Low breast carcinoma in metastatic settings: a cytological approach to proliferation and survival. Evolving concepts in head and neck cytology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1