Use of Clinically Informed Strategies and Diagnostic Yields of Genetic Testing for Fetal Structural Anomalies Following a Non-Diagnostic Microarray Result: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1002/pd.6759
Victoria M Allen, Erica Schollenberg, Erika Aberg, Jo-Ann K Brock
{"title":"Use of Clinically Informed Strategies and Diagnostic Yields of Genetic Testing for Fetal Structural Anomalies Following a Non-Diagnostic Microarray Result: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Victoria M Allen, Erica Schollenberg, Erika Aberg, Jo-Ann K Brock","doi":"10.1002/pd.6759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the performance of targeted gene sequencing, expanded gene panels, and selected exomes for prenatally identified fetal anomalies, after non-diagnostic microarray results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All fetal samples received for genetic testing for fetal structural anomalies in the Canadian Maritime Provinces (2014-2022) were identified. Utilization and results of NGS sequencing strategies after a non-diagnostic microarray were correlated with ultrasound findings and autopsy results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and ninety-three cases of fetal anomalies with non-diagnostic RAD results were identified, including 319 (54%) with isolated anomalies. Diagnostic yield from the microarray was 7.5%. Sequence-based testing for 131 cases gave an overall diagnostic yield of 38% (8.4% of initial cohort). For isolated anomalies, diagnostic yield was highest in the intracranial, renal, and musculoskeletal systems (44%, 60%, 64% respectively). Appropriate targeted gene sequencing provided a diagnostic yield of 40%. With clinically indicated criteria for exome analysis, diagnostic yields were higher than when clinical information prompted use of a selected gene panel (73% vs. 27%). Expanding to an exome after a non-diagnostic gene panel had an additional diagnostic yield of 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary review and comprehensive clinical information can inform the selection of strategies for expanded genetic testing after non-diagnostic microarray for fetal anomalies within a publicly funded health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the performance of targeted gene sequencing, expanded gene panels, and selected exomes for prenatally identified fetal anomalies, after non-diagnostic microarray results.

Method: All fetal samples received for genetic testing for fetal structural anomalies in the Canadian Maritime Provinces (2014-2022) were identified. Utilization and results of NGS sequencing strategies after a non-diagnostic microarray were correlated with ultrasound findings and autopsy results.

Results: Five hundred and ninety-three cases of fetal anomalies with non-diagnostic RAD results were identified, including 319 (54%) with isolated anomalies. Diagnostic yield from the microarray was 7.5%. Sequence-based testing for 131 cases gave an overall diagnostic yield of 38% (8.4% of initial cohort). For isolated anomalies, diagnostic yield was highest in the intracranial, renal, and musculoskeletal systems (44%, 60%, 64% respectively). Appropriate targeted gene sequencing provided a diagnostic yield of 40%. With clinically indicated criteria for exome analysis, diagnostic yields were higher than when clinical information prompted use of a selected gene panel (73% vs. 27%). Expanding to an exome after a non-diagnostic gene panel had an additional diagnostic yield of 13%.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary review and comprehensive clinical information can inform the selection of strategies for expanded genetic testing after non-diagnostic microarray for fetal anomalies within a publicly funded health care system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Intrinsic Fetal Airway Obstruction (CHAOS): Correlations Between Ultrasound, Fetoscopic, and Pathological Findings. Cell-Free DNA Results Indicating Mosaic Monosomy X of Likely Maternal Origin: Impact on Genetic Counseling Practices and Patient Experiences. Enhancing Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: A Novel Approach to Improve 45,X Prediction Accuracy. Use of Clinically Informed Strategies and Diagnostic Yields of Genetic Testing for Fetal Structural Anomalies Following a Non-Diagnostic Microarray Result: A Population-Based Cohort Study. BinDel: Detecting Clinically Relevant Fetal Genomic Microdeletions Using Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based NIPT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1