Standardizing surgical training with objective performance indicators: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11599-3
Sarah Choksi, Mattia Ballo, Craig Profant, Katherine Portelli, Vikrom Dhar, Ryan Schmidt, Andrew Yee, Jaisa Olasky, Filippo Filicori
{"title":"Standardizing surgical training with objective performance indicators: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Sarah Choksi, Mattia Ballo, Craig Profant, Katherine Portelli, Vikrom Dhar, Ryan Schmidt, Andrew Yee, Jaisa Olasky, Filippo Filicori","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11599-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple surgical virtual reality (VR) simulators are currently available; however, there is lack of comparison between performance after practice on these simulators compared to bench top models. Utilizing the Intuitive Data recorder (IDR) and Objective performance indicators (OPI), we aim to objectively assess robotic surgical skills using a dry lab model. We hypothesize that practicing surgical skills will improve OPIs and that those who practice on the dry lab model will have a greater improvement in their OPIs compared to those who practice with Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) SimNow VR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IDR was used to record kinematics as each participant went through five basic surgery tasks on a dry lab benchtop model to record baseline performance. Participants were then randomized to practice on the dry lab model or the corresponding SimNow Virtual reality (VR) tasks. The participants repeated the tasks again on the benchtop model. Statistical analysis was performed using paired samples t tests, independent samples t tests, and ANOVA tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven surgeons participated in our study ranging from interns to attendings. Randomization to VR vs benchtop practice resulted in 11 and 13 participants in each group. For the rollercoaster, backhand suturing, railroad, and knot tying tasks, a significant improvement in kinematic profiles was observed. Bimanual dexterity, angular motion, and smoothness metrics improved most consistently across the tasks after practice. Kinematic profiles between those practicing on VR versus benchtop had no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that OPIs can be used to benchmark surgical trainees. VR appears to be non-inferior to dry lab model for practice for trainees. We identified patterns in OPI improvement that can be tailored to specific skills depending on the trainees needs. Our study is the first step in developing a standardized training and assessment tool to assess competency in robotic surgery training.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2316-2323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11599-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple surgical virtual reality (VR) simulators are currently available; however, there is lack of comparison between performance after practice on these simulators compared to bench top models. Utilizing the Intuitive Data recorder (IDR) and Objective performance indicators (OPI), we aim to objectively assess robotic surgical skills using a dry lab model. We hypothesize that practicing surgical skills will improve OPIs and that those who practice on the dry lab model will have a greater improvement in their OPIs compared to those who practice with Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) SimNow VR.

Methods: The IDR was used to record kinematics as each participant went through five basic surgery tasks on a dry lab benchtop model to record baseline performance. Participants were then randomized to practice on the dry lab model or the corresponding SimNow Virtual reality (VR) tasks. The participants repeated the tasks again on the benchtop model. Statistical analysis was performed using paired samples t tests, independent samples t tests, and ANOVA tests.

Results: Twenty-seven surgeons participated in our study ranging from interns to attendings. Randomization to VR vs benchtop practice resulted in 11 and 13 participants in each group. For the rollercoaster, backhand suturing, railroad, and knot tying tasks, a significant improvement in kinematic profiles was observed. Bimanual dexterity, angular motion, and smoothness metrics improved most consistently across the tasks after practice. Kinematic profiles between those practicing on VR versus benchtop had no significant differences.

Conclusions: This study shows that OPIs can be used to benchmark surgical trainees. VR appears to be non-inferior to dry lab model for practice for trainees. We identified patterns in OPI improvement that can be tailored to specific skills depending on the trainees needs. Our study is the first step in developing a standardized training and assessment tool to assess competency in robotic surgery training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用客观绩效指标实现外科培训标准化:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:多种外科虚拟现实(VR)模拟器目前可用;然而,在这些模拟器上练习后的性能与台式模型相比缺乏比较。利用直观数据记录仪(IDR)和客观性能指标(OPI),我们的目标是使用干实验室模型客观评估机器人手术技能。我们假设练习手术技能将提高opi,那些在干实验室模型上练习的人与那些使用机器人手术基础(FRS) SimNow VR练习的人相比,他们的opi会有更大的提高。方法:当每个参与者在干燥的实验室台式模型上完成五个基本手术任务时,使用IDR记录运动学,以记录基线性能。然后,参与者被随机分配到干实验室模型或相应的SimNow虚拟现实(VR)任务中进行练习。参与者在台式模型上再次重复了这些任务。采用配对样本t检验、独立样本t检验和方差分析进行统计分析。结果:27名外科医生参与了我们的研究,从实习生到主治医生。随机分为VR和台式练习,每组分别有11名和13名参与者。对于过山车,反手缝合,铁路和打结任务,观察到运动轮廓的显着改善。双手灵巧度、角度运动和平滑度指标在练习后的任务中得到了最一致的改善。在VR和台式电脑上练习的人的运动曲线没有显著差异。结论:本研究表明opi可以作为外科培训生的基准。对于受训者来说,虚拟现实似乎不逊色于干实验室模型。我们确定了OPI改进的模式,这些模式可以根据受训者的需要针对特定的技能进行调整。我们的研究是开发标准化培训和评估工具来评估机器人手术培训能力的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Comparative benefits of robotic gastrectomy over laparoscopic surgery across different age and BMI groups. Balloon dilation versus endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of Crohn's anastomotic stricture: experimental randomized study. Comparative seven year outcomes of RYGB and SADI-S as revisional procedures for weight recurrence regain after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss trajectory, reflux control, and metabolic safety. Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric ischemic conditioning before esophagectomy: contemporary practices and insights from an international survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1