Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) in Tamil.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025
Swetha Balaji, Aishwarya Nallamuthu
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) in Tamil.","authors":"Swetha Balaji, Aishwarya Nallamuthu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) is a valuable tool for assessing coping strategies in individuals with voice disorders. The scarcity of evidence on coping strategies for voice-related problems globally highlights the need to establish the validity and reliability of the VDCQ in specific populations and languages. Cross-cultural adaptation is necessary to ensure the tool's linguistic and cultural relevance for Tamil-speaking individuals with dysphonia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the VDCQ into Tamil (VDCQ-T) and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in Tamil-speaking populations with voice disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study followed a standardized process for translation and cultural adaptation, involving forward translation, expert panel review, back-translation, and pilot testing. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five speech-language pathologists, three Tamil language experts, and feedback from participants. The VDCQ-T was administered to 150 participants (75 with voice disorders and 75 controls). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to extract factors, and the questionnaire's reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA revealed four distinct factors: social support (factor I), passive coping (factor II), avoidance (factor III), and information seeking (factor IV). The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.909, and test-retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.782. The VDCQ-T showed significant differences between the voice disorder group and the control group, confirming its construct validity. Although subgroup analysis for specific voice disorders was limited, the results suggest that the tool is broadly applicable to individuals with dysphonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VDCQ-T is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing coping strategies in Tamil-speaking individuals with voice disorders. The findings emphasize the importance of social support in managing dysphonia. Future studies should explore subgroup differences and include a more diverse sample to enhance generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) is a valuable tool for assessing coping strategies in individuals with voice disorders. The scarcity of evidence on coping strategies for voice-related problems globally highlights the need to establish the validity and reliability of the VDCQ in specific populations and languages. Cross-cultural adaptation is necessary to ensure the tool's linguistic and cultural relevance for Tamil-speaking individuals with dysphonia.

Objectives: This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the VDCQ into Tamil (VDCQ-T) and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in Tamil-speaking populations with voice disorders.

Method: The study followed a standardized process for translation and cultural adaptation, involving forward translation, expert panel review, back-translation, and pilot testing. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five speech-language pathologists, three Tamil language experts, and feedback from participants. The VDCQ-T was administered to 150 participants (75 with voice disorders and 75 controls). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to extract factors, and the questionnaire's reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: PCA revealed four distinct factors: social support (factor I), passive coping (factor II), avoidance (factor III), and information seeking (factor IV). The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.909, and test-retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.782. The VDCQ-T showed significant differences between the voice disorder group and the control group, confirming its construct validity. Although subgroup analysis for specific voice disorders was limited, the results suggest that the tool is broadly applicable to individuals with dysphonia.

Conclusions: VDCQ-T is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing coping strategies in Tamil-speaking individuals with voice disorders. The findings emphasize the importance of social support in managing dysphonia. Future studies should explore subgroup differences and include a more diverse sample to enhance generalizability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰米尔语语音障碍应对问卷(VDCQ)的跨文化适应与验证
背景:语音障碍应对问卷(VDCQ)是评估语音障碍个体应对策略的重要工具。在全球范围内,语音相关问题的应对策略缺乏证据,这凸显了在特定人群和语言中建立VDCQ的有效性和可靠性的必要性。跨文化适应是必要的,以确保该工具的语言和文化相关性的泰米尔语个体的发音障碍。目的:本研究旨在跨文化适应泰米尔语的VDCQ (VDCQ- t),并评估其在泰米尔语语音障碍人群中使用的有效性和可靠性。方法:研究遵循标准化的翻译和文化适应过程,包括正向翻译、专家小组评审、反向翻译和试点测试。内容有效性由五名语言病理学家、三名泰米尔语专家组成的小组和参与者的反馈进行评估。150名参与者接受了VDCQ-T测试(75名声音障碍患者和75名对照组)。采用主成分分析(PCA)提取因子,采用Cronbach’s alpha评价问卷信度,采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行重测信度评价。结果:主成分分析揭示了社会支持(因子I)、被动应对(因子II)、回避(因子III)和信息寻求(因子IV)四个显著的影响因素。问卷内部一致性高,Cronbach's alpha为0.909,重测信度ICC为0.782。VDCQ-T在语音障碍组和对照组之间存在显著差异,证实了其结构效度。虽然对特定语音障碍的亚组分析有限,但结果表明该工具广泛适用于语音障碍患者。结论:VDCQ-T是评估泰米尔语语音障碍患者应对策略的有效、可靠的工具。研究结果强调了社会支持在处理语音障碍中的重要性。未来的研究应探索亚组差异,包括更多样化的样本,以提高普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Differential and Additional Diagnoses of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Case Series. The Length Measurement and Strain Calculation of Vocal Folds in Young Opera Singers with Different Voice Classifications Using Ultrasonography. Association Between Respiratory Allergies and Vocal Symptoms: A Cross-sectional Population-Based Study. Administration of Hormone Replacement Therapy Containing Estrogen and Development of Autoimmune Associated Vocal Fold Lesions in Women. Reliability and Validity of the Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) in the Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux among Chinese Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1