Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) in Tamil.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025
Swetha Balaji, Aishwarya Nallamuthu
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) in Tamil.","authors":"Swetha Balaji, Aishwarya Nallamuthu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) is a valuable tool for assessing coping strategies in individuals with voice disorders. The scarcity of evidence on coping strategies for voice-related problems globally highlights the need to establish the validity and reliability of the VDCQ in specific populations and languages. Cross-cultural adaptation is necessary to ensure the tool's linguistic and cultural relevance for Tamil-speaking individuals with dysphonia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the VDCQ into Tamil (VDCQ-T) and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in Tamil-speaking populations with voice disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study followed a standardized process for translation and cultural adaptation, involving forward translation, expert panel review, back-translation, and pilot testing. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five speech-language pathologists, three Tamil language experts, and feedback from participants. The VDCQ-T was administered to 150 participants (75 with voice disorders and 75 controls). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to extract factors, and the questionnaire's reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA revealed four distinct factors: social support (factor I), passive coping (factor II), avoidance (factor III), and information seeking (factor IV). The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.909, and test-retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.782. The VDCQ-T showed significant differences between the voice disorder group and the control group, confirming its construct validity. Although subgroup analysis for specific voice disorders was limited, the results suggest that the tool is broadly applicable to individuals with dysphonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VDCQ-T is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing coping strategies in Tamil-speaking individuals with voice disorders. The findings emphasize the importance of social support in managing dysphonia. Future studies should explore subgroup differences and include a more diverse sample to enhance generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) is a valuable tool for assessing coping strategies in individuals with voice disorders. The scarcity of evidence on coping strategies for voice-related problems globally highlights the need to establish the validity and reliability of the VDCQ in specific populations and languages. Cross-cultural adaptation is necessary to ensure the tool's linguistic and cultural relevance for Tamil-speaking individuals with dysphonia.

Objectives: This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the VDCQ into Tamil (VDCQ-T) and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in Tamil-speaking populations with voice disorders.

Method: The study followed a standardized process for translation and cultural adaptation, involving forward translation, expert panel review, back-translation, and pilot testing. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five speech-language pathologists, three Tamil language experts, and feedback from participants. The VDCQ-T was administered to 150 participants (75 with voice disorders and 75 controls). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to extract factors, and the questionnaire's reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: PCA revealed four distinct factors: social support (factor I), passive coping (factor II), avoidance (factor III), and information seeking (factor IV). The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.909, and test-retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.782. The VDCQ-T showed significant differences between the voice disorder group and the control group, confirming its construct validity. Although subgroup analysis for specific voice disorders was limited, the results suggest that the tool is broadly applicable to individuals with dysphonia.

Conclusions: VDCQ-T is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing coping strategies in Tamil-speaking individuals with voice disorders. The findings emphasize the importance of social support in managing dysphonia. Future studies should explore subgroup differences and include a more diverse sample to enhance generalizability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
The Importance for Proposing a Treatment for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Considering the Weakly Acid Pattern. Vocal Fatigue and Recovery Patterns Among Call Center Operators: A Workday Progression Study. Open-Source Manually Annotated Vocal Tract Database for Automatic Segmentation from 3D MRI Using Deep Learning: Benchmarking 2D and 3D Convolutional and Transformer Networks. Resonance Strategies in the Upper Range of Western Operatic Tenors. Airflow Vibrato Dependence on Pitch, Loudness, Adduction, and Straight Tone: A Single Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1