Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4
Mengqing Si, Yile Jiao, Li Xu, Rongruo Lin, Xiaorong Zhong, Qing Lv
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators.","authors":"Mengqing Si, Yile Jiao, Li Xu, Rongruo Lin, Xiaorong Zhong, Qing Lv","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are recognized for their aesthetic benefits in breast cancer patients. However, detailed evaluations with large samples of their long-term oncological effectiveness are limited. This study aims to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of NSM/SSM and traditional mastectomy (TM) in patients with stage I-III breast cancer and to identify influential preoperative factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the 12,802 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 295 NSM/SSM patients and 584 TM patients were selected after propensity score matching adjusted for variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Fisher's exact test, and log-rank tests, with Cox regression identifying survival predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 97.93 months. Local recurrence (LR) was 5.76 ± 1.36% for NSM/SSM compared to 3.25 ± 0.73% for TM (p = 0.076). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (p = 0.601), while disease-free survival (DFS) showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.066). However, there was a significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.029). The 5-year OS rates between the matched groups were similar (98.11% vs. 98.09%, p = 1.000), while the TM group exhibited higher 5-year DFS(95.14% vs. 92.03%, p = 0.335). Following the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis identified significant DFS predictors: stage (HR = 2.701, p = 0.031), radiotherapy (HR = 1.928, p = 0.018), and targeted therapy (HR = 5.584, p < 0.001). For OS, significant predictors included stage (HR = 8.309, p = 0.021) and PR status (HR = 0.35, p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NSM/SSM demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to TM, though with lower DMFS. Preoperative ultrasound parameters showed no significant impact on long-term outcomes, confirming the oncologic safety of NSM/SSM. Tailored adjuvant therapies and appropriate follow-up may further optimize patient prognoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are recognized for their aesthetic benefits in breast cancer patients. However, detailed evaluations with large samples of their long-term oncological effectiveness are limited. This study aims to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of NSM/SSM and traditional mastectomy (TM) in patients with stage I-III breast cancer and to identify influential preoperative factors.

Methods: Among the 12,802 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 295 NSM/SSM patients and 584 TM patients were selected after propensity score matching adjusted for variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Fisher's exact test, and log-rank tests, with Cox regression identifying survival predictors.

Results: The median follow-up period was 97.93 months. Local recurrence (LR) was 5.76 ± 1.36% for NSM/SSM compared to 3.25 ± 0.73% for TM (p = 0.076). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (p = 0.601), while disease-free survival (DFS) showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.066). However, there was a significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.029). The 5-year OS rates between the matched groups were similar (98.11% vs. 98.09%, p = 1.000), while the TM group exhibited higher 5-year DFS(95.14% vs. 92.03%, p = 0.335). Following the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis identified significant DFS predictors: stage (HR = 2.701, p = 0.031), radiotherapy (HR = 1.928, p = 0.018), and targeted therapy (HR = 5.584, p < 0.001). For OS, significant predictors included stage (HR = 8.309, p = 0.021) and PR status (HR = 0.35, p = 0.010).

Conclusions: NSM/SSM demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to TM, though with lower DMFS. Preoperative ultrasound parameters showed no significant impact on long-term outcomes, confirming the oncologic safety of NSM/SSM. Tailored adjuvant therapies and appropriate follow-up may further optimize patient prognoses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留皮肤乳房切除术和保留乳头乳房切除术与传统乳房切除术治疗乳腺癌的长期疗效:基于术前超声和临床指标的病例对照研究
背景与目的:保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)和保留皮肤乳房切除术(SSM)因其对乳腺癌患者的美学益处而得到认可。然而,对其长期肿瘤疗效的大样本详细评估是有限的。本研究旨在比较NSM/SSM与传统乳房切除术(TM)对I-III期乳腺癌患者的长期肿瘤预后,并确定术前影响因素。方法:在2009 - 2022年四川大学华西医院手术的12802例乳腺癌患者中,经倾向评分匹配调整变量后,选择NSM/SSM患者295例,TM患者584例。使用Kaplan-Meier估计、Fisher精确检验和log-rank检验分析生存结果,并使用Cox回归确定生存预测因子。结果:中位随访时间为97.93个月。NSM/SSM的局部复发率(LR)为5.76±1.36%,TM为3.25±0.73% (p = 0.076)。总生存期(OS)具有可比性(p = 0.601),无病生存期(DFS)具有显著性(p = 0.066)。然而,在远处无转移生存(DMFS)方面存在显著差异(p = 0.029)。匹配组间5年OS率相似(98.11%比98.09%,p = 1.000), TM组5年DFS更高(95.14%比92.03%,p = 0.335)。单因素分析后,多因素分析确定了显著的DFS预测因素:分期(HR = 2.701, p = 0.031)、放疗(HR = 1.928, p = 0.018)和靶向治疗(HR = 5.584, p)。结论:NSM/SSM的OS和DFS与TM相当,但DMFS较低。术前超声参数对远期预后无显著影响,证实了NSM/SSM的肿瘤学安全性。量身定制的辅助治疗和适当的随访可进一步优化患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Impact of combined vascular resection on short and long-term results following radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a systematic assessment. Revisiting PIV in lung cancer: bridging prognostic insights with clinical applicability. Correction: PTEN suppresses renal cell carcinoma proliferation and migration via inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Radiogenomics and machine learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: from foundations to clinical translation. Neoadjuvant afatinib in a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an NPTN-NRG1 fusion: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1