Systematic review and meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of exosomes in pancreatic cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12957-025-03666-9
Xinyi Xu, Chunyue Long, Meng Li, Chen Shen, Qiuwen Ye, Yong Li, Hongyang Li, Xia Cao, Jun Ma
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of exosomes in pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Xinyi Xu, Chunyue Long, Meng Li, Chen Shen, Qiuwen Ye, Yong Li, Hongyang Li, Xia Cao, Jun Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03666-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early, non-invasive identification can generally enhance the survival rate for asymptomatic pancreatic cancer (PC). This systematic review and meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the precision of diagnosing PC using serum and duodenal fluid exosomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses), searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases in April 2024. A study was considered appropriate if it provided diagnostic precision and accuracy for patients with pancreatic cancer. The combined diagnostic impact was assessed by calculating the area beneath the aggregated SROC curve, and the quality of the studies included was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 checklist. All statistical evaluations and graphical representations utilized STATA 14.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employing the terms \"exosomes\" and \"pancreatic cancer\" along with the search methodology, research was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases. A total of 1202 studies were extracted from the databases, out of which nine were ultimately selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion standards. Across eight studies, exosomes were isolated from serum, while in a different one, they were taken from duodenal fluid. This document conducts subgroup analyses focusing on various types of exosome biomarkers, their origins, isolation techniques, and methods for analyzing biomarkers. Within the subset of exosome biomarker types, the group with exosomal cell surface proteoglycan exhibited the greatest combined sensitivity (0.96 (95% CI = 0.81-0.99) and specificity (0.90 (95% CI = 0.83-0.95)). Additionally, the set of exosomal cell surface proteoglycans showed the highest aggregated diagnostic ratio (215.92), combined positive likelihood ratio (9.96), area under the curve (0.93), and kombiniertes negative Likelihood-Ratio (0.05). The combined sensitivity of serum-derived exosomes stood at (0.86 (95% CI = 0.77-0.92)), the collective specificity at (0.83 (95% CI = 0.77-0.89)), the aggregate positive likelihood ratio at (5.22), the combined diagnostic ratio at (31.48), the overall area beneath the curve at (0.91), and the combined negative likelihood ratio at (0.17). Within the subgroup examination of exosome isolation techniques, ultracentrifugation emerged as the most sensitive method (0.90 (95% CI = 0.74-0.97)), the most specific method (0.89 (95% CI = 0.83-0.93)), the top positive likelihood ratio (8.35), the highest diagnostic ratio (76.48), the largest combined curve area (0.92), and the smallest negative likelihood ratio (0.11) in the aggregated data. Within the subset of biomarker analysis methods, the aggregate sensitivity via qRT-PCR was (0.84 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90)), the collective specificity (0.78 (95% CI = 0.64-0.87)), the aggregate diagnostic ratio (18.11), the aggregate area under the curve (0.88), the aggregate positive likelihood ratio (3.77), and the combined negative likelihood ratio (0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, exosomes are still valuable in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In subgroup analyses, the proteoglycan found on exosomal cell surfaces is highly valuable for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. The more frequent separation method used in the nine included studies was ultracentrifugation, and it did demonstrate good data. Nonetheless, to verify their practicality and usefulness in clinical environments, a significant amount of clinical trials are still necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03666-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early, non-invasive identification can generally enhance the survival rate for asymptomatic pancreatic cancer (PC). This systematic review and meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the precision of diagnosing PC using serum and duodenal fluid exosomes.

Methods: Following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses), searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases in April 2024. A study was considered appropriate if it provided diagnostic precision and accuracy for patients with pancreatic cancer. The combined diagnostic impact was assessed by calculating the area beneath the aggregated SROC curve, and the quality of the studies included was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 checklist. All statistical evaluations and graphical representations utilized STATA 14.0.

Results: Employing the terms "exosomes" and "pancreatic cancer" along with the search methodology, research was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases. A total of 1202 studies were extracted from the databases, out of which nine were ultimately selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion standards. Across eight studies, exosomes were isolated from serum, while in a different one, they were taken from duodenal fluid. This document conducts subgroup analyses focusing on various types of exosome biomarkers, their origins, isolation techniques, and methods for analyzing biomarkers. Within the subset of exosome biomarker types, the group with exosomal cell surface proteoglycan exhibited the greatest combined sensitivity (0.96 (95% CI = 0.81-0.99) and specificity (0.90 (95% CI = 0.83-0.95)). Additionally, the set of exosomal cell surface proteoglycans showed the highest aggregated diagnostic ratio (215.92), combined positive likelihood ratio (9.96), area under the curve (0.93), and kombiniertes negative Likelihood-Ratio (0.05). The combined sensitivity of serum-derived exosomes stood at (0.86 (95% CI = 0.77-0.92)), the collective specificity at (0.83 (95% CI = 0.77-0.89)), the aggregate positive likelihood ratio at (5.22), the combined diagnostic ratio at (31.48), the overall area beneath the curve at (0.91), and the combined negative likelihood ratio at (0.17). Within the subgroup examination of exosome isolation techniques, ultracentrifugation emerged as the most sensitive method (0.90 (95% CI = 0.74-0.97)), the most specific method (0.89 (95% CI = 0.83-0.93)), the top positive likelihood ratio (8.35), the highest diagnostic ratio (76.48), the largest combined curve area (0.92), and the smallest negative likelihood ratio (0.11) in the aggregated data. Within the subset of biomarker analysis methods, the aggregate sensitivity via qRT-PCR was (0.84 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90)), the collective specificity (0.78 (95% CI = 0.64-0.87)), the aggregate diagnostic ratio (18.11), the aggregate area under the curve (0.88), the aggregate positive likelihood ratio (3.77), and the combined negative likelihood ratio (0.21).

Conclusion: Overall, exosomes are still valuable in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In subgroup analyses, the proteoglycan found on exosomal cell surfaces is highly valuable for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. The more frequent separation method used in the nine included studies was ultracentrifugation, and it did demonstrate good data. Nonetheless, to verify their practicality and usefulness in clinical environments, a significant amount of clinical trials are still necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾和荟萃分析:胰腺癌外泌体的诊断准确性。
背景:早期、无创诊断通常可以提高无症状胰腺癌(PC)的生存率。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估使用血清和十二指肠液外泌体诊断PC的准确性。方法:按照PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and meta - analysis)的指南,于2024年4月在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库中进行检索。如果一项研究能为胰腺癌患者提供诊断的精确性和准确性,则被认为是适当的。通过计算综合SROC曲线下的面积来评估综合诊断影响,并使用QUADAS-2检查表评估纳入研究的质量。所有统计评估和图形表示使用STATA 14.0。结果:使用术语“外泌体”和“胰腺癌”以及搜索方法,在PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane和Embase数据库中进行了研究。从数据库中共提取1202项研究,根据特定的纳入和排除标准最终选择了9项研究。在八项研究中,外泌体是从血清中分离出来的,而在另一项研究中,它们是从十二指肠液中提取出来的。本文对各种类型的外泌体生物标志物、它们的起源、分离技术和分析生物标志物的方法进行了亚群分析。在外泌体生物标志物类型的亚群中,外泌体细胞表面蛋白多糖组表现出最大的综合敏感性(0.96 (95% CI = 0.81-0.99)和特异性(0.90 (95% CI = 0.83-0.95))。外体细胞表面蛋白多糖组的总诊断率最高(215.92),联合阳性似然比(9.96),曲线下面积(0.93),kombiniertes阴性似然比(0.05)。血清源性外泌体的联合敏感性为0.86 (95% CI = 0.77-0.92),集体特异性为0.83 (95% CI = 0.77-0.89),总阳性似然比为5.22,联合诊断比为31.48,曲线下总面积为0.91,联合阴性似然比为0.17。在外显体分离技术的亚组检测中,超离心是最敏感的方法(0.90 (95% CI = 0.74-0.97)),最特异的方法(0.89 (95% CI = 0.83-0.93)),阳性似然比最高(8.35),诊断率最高(76.48),综合曲线面积最大(0.92),阴性似然比最小(0.11)。在生物标志物分析方法的子集中,qRT-PCR的总体敏感性为(0.84 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90)),总体特异性为(0.78 (95% CI = 0.64-0.87)),总体诊断比为(18.11),总体曲线下面积为(0.88),总体阳性似然比为(3.77),联合阴性似然比为(0.21)。结论:总的来说,外泌体在胰腺癌的诊断中仍有价值。在亚群分析中,外泌体细胞表面发现的蛋白多糖对诊断胰腺癌有很高的价值。在九项纳入的研究中使用的更频繁的分离方法是超离心,它确实证明了良好的数据。然而,为了验证其在临床环境中的实用性和实用性,仍需要大量的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Radiogenomics and machine learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: from foundations to clinical translation. Neoadjuvant afatinib in a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an NPTN-NRG1 fusion: a case report. Oncogenic SOX9-TRAIP signaling drives gastric cancer progression by mediating the degradation of the CPEB3-mTORC1 tumor suppressor axis. Fibroblast-associated CTHRC1 as a key indicator of recurrence risk in prostate cancer. Sentinel lymph node status and oncological outcomes of high-risk and low-risk cutaneous primary melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1