Best Practices for Early Intervention and Remediation of Residents in Family Medicine: Insights From an Interdisciplinary Delphi Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2025.820384
Christopher M Haymaker, Jessica Schilling, Kathryn Fraser, Emilee Delbridge, Amber Cadick, Amy Romain, Melissa E Arthur, Grace Pratt, Molly S Clark
{"title":"Best Practices for Early Intervention and Remediation of Residents in Family Medicine: Insights From an Interdisciplinary Delphi Study.","authors":"Christopher M Haymaker, Jessica Schilling, Kathryn Fraser, Emilee Delbridge, Amber Cadick, Amy Romain, Melissa E Arthur, Grace Pratt, Molly S Clark","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.820384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remediation and early intervention for family medicine residents who experience performance problems represent a challenge for programs, faculty, and residents. Some evidence suggests that identifying those at risk for performance problems and providing support early may prevent more serious issues later in residency.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We wanted to explore the perspectives of content experts to identify best practices for early intervention and remediation to address common challenges and create a framework for more effective and inclusive early intervention and remediation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Delphi approach to identify themes and best practices for early intervention and remediation, including qualitative interviews, identification of themes, clarification of essential practices, and confirmation of agreement with core medical faculty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our qualitative interviews and Delphi methodology identified best practices in five main categories: (a) early assessment and identification, (b) feedback, (c) resident engagement, (d) intervention strategies and resources, and (e) documentation. From an initial pool of 38 recommendations, we identified a final group of 11 practices that generated broad agreement among behavioral science faculty and core medical faculty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key principles for early intervention and remediation include early skill assessment, data-driven feedback, collaborative processes, diverse resources, clear documentation, and faculty training for providing actionable feedback. While our Delphi study provided in-depth insights into various programs' practices, it may not capture unique practices across all programs. Future research on early intervention and remediation should explore current practices, aiming for specific, collaborative, and transparent processes, with insights from experienced faculty, to enhance equity and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":"57 2","pages":"98-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.820384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remediation and early intervention for family medicine residents who experience performance problems represent a challenge for programs, faculty, and residents. Some evidence suggests that identifying those at risk for performance problems and providing support early may prevent more serious issues later in residency.

Objectives: We wanted to explore the perspectives of content experts to identify best practices for early intervention and remediation to address common challenges and create a framework for more effective and inclusive early intervention and remediation.

Methods: We used a Delphi approach to identify themes and best practices for early intervention and remediation, including qualitative interviews, identification of themes, clarification of essential practices, and confirmation of agreement with core medical faculty.

Results: Our qualitative interviews and Delphi methodology identified best practices in five main categories: (a) early assessment and identification, (b) feedback, (c) resident engagement, (d) intervention strategies and resources, and (e) documentation. From an initial pool of 38 recommendations, we identified a final group of 11 practices that generated broad agreement among behavioral science faculty and core medical faculty.

Conclusions: Key principles for early intervention and remediation include early skill assessment, data-driven feedback, collaborative processes, diverse resources, clear documentation, and faculty training for providing actionable feedback. While our Delphi study provided in-depth insights into various programs' practices, it may not capture unique practices across all programs. Future research on early intervention and remediation should explore current practices, aiming for specific, collaborative, and transparent processes, with insights from experienced faculty, to enhance equity and effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:对出现成绩问题的全科住院医师进行补救和早期干预是项目、教师和住院医师面临的一项挑战。一些证据表明,及早发现存在成绩问题的高危人群并提供支持,可避免住院医师培训后期出现更严重的问题:我们希望从内容专家的角度出发,确定早期干预和补救的最佳实践,以应对共同的挑战,并为更有效、更具包容性的早期干预和补救创建一个框架:我们采用德尔菲法来确定早期干预和补救的主题和最佳实践,包括定性访谈、确定主题、澄清基本实践以及与核心医学教员确认一致意见:我们通过定性访谈和德尔菲方法确定了五大类最佳实践:(a) 早期评估和识别;(b) 反馈;(c) 居民参与;(d) 干预策略和资源;(e) 文件记录。从最初的 38 项建议中,我们确定了最终的 11 项实践,这些实践在行为科学教员和核心医学教员中产生了广泛的共识:结论:早期干预和补救的关键原则包括早期技能评估、数据驱动的反馈、合作流程、多样化资源、清晰的文档记录以及提供可操作反馈的教师培训。虽然我们的德尔菲研究提供了对不同项目实践的深入见解,但它可能无法捕捉到所有项目的独特实践。未来有关早期干预和补救的研究应探索当前的做法,以具体、协作和透明的流程为目标,并结合经验丰富的教师的见解,以提高公平性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
期刊最新文献
Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training. Authors' Response to "Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training". Fostering Collaborative Practice Through Interprofessional Education. How Different Are Family Medicine Residents Who Desire Additional Training? Misalignment of Biostatistics Content Between Licensing Exam Study Aids and Contemporary Medical Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1