Correlation of Milestone Ratings and Family Physicians' Early Diabetes Management.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2025.980357
Sean O Hogan, Kenji Yamazaki, Eric S Holmboe
{"title":"Correlation of Milestone Ratings and Family Physicians' Early Diabetes Management.","authors":"Sean O Hogan, Kenji Yamazaki, Eric S Holmboe","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.980357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Family physicians manage the treatment of patients with chronic illnesses like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). During residency, trainees are assessed on their management of chronic disease under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education patient care (PC) milestone. Residency programs are expected to ensure that trainees are prepared to meet patients' needs; however, evidence is mixed as to whether milestone evaluations predict how well a physician will perform in early unsupervised practice. This study tested whether higher PC milestone evaluations predict greater adherence to T2DM guidelines for early-career family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using national provider identification numbers, we linked family medicine trainees' penultimate PC milestones with commercial insurance claims for T2DM patients. We associated doctors with patients by identifying the doctors who performed the evaluation and maintenance exams and observing the extent to which those patients received HbA1c, retinal, and renal functioning exams. We followed doctors who graduated in June 2016 through the first 18 months of unsupervised practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Milestones were not significantly associated with screening outcomes: HbA1c (OR=0.963, 95% CI [0.840, 1.104]), nephropathy (OR=0.983, 95% CI [0.901, 1.072]), or eye exam (OR=1.001, 95% CI [0.936, 1.070]). Rather, for every additional diabetes patient a family physician saw, administration of standard tests increased: HbA1c (OR=1.005, 95% CI [1.002, 1.009]) and nephropathy (OR=1.004, 95% CI [1.002, 1.006]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Milestones for chronic disease management were not correlated with diabetes management for early career family physicians. The volume of diabetic patients under a doctor's care was positively correlated with levels of expected screenings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":"57 2","pages":"83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.980357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Family physicians manage the treatment of patients with chronic illnesses like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). During residency, trainees are assessed on their management of chronic disease under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education patient care (PC) milestone. Residency programs are expected to ensure that trainees are prepared to meet patients' needs; however, evidence is mixed as to whether milestone evaluations predict how well a physician will perform in early unsupervised practice. This study tested whether higher PC milestone evaluations predict greater adherence to T2DM guidelines for early-career family physicians.

Methods: Using national provider identification numbers, we linked family medicine trainees' penultimate PC milestones with commercial insurance claims for T2DM patients. We associated doctors with patients by identifying the doctors who performed the evaluation and maintenance exams and observing the extent to which those patients received HbA1c, retinal, and renal functioning exams. We followed doctors who graduated in June 2016 through the first 18 months of unsupervised practice.

Results: Milestones were not significantly associated with screening outcomes: HbA1c (OR=0.963, 95% CI [0.840, 1.104]), nephropathy (OR=0.983, 95% CI [0.901, 1.072]), or eye exam (OR=1.001, 95% CI [0.936, 1.070]). Rather, for every additional diabetes patient a family physician saw, administration of standard tests increased: HbA1c (OR=1.005, 95% CI [1.002, 1.009]) and nephropathy (OR=1.004, 95% CI [1.002, 1.006]).

Conclusions: Milestones for chronic disease management were not correlated with diabetes management for early career family physicians. The volume of diabetic patients under a doctor's care was positively correlated with levels of expected screenings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
期刊最新文献
Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training. Authors' Response to "Anticipating Uncertainty: A New Frontier in Family Medicine Training". Fostering Collaborative Practice Through Interprofessional Education. How Different Are Family Medicine Residents Who Desire Additional Training? Misalignment of Biostatistics Content Between Licensing Exam Study Aids and Contemporary Medical Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1