Vertical and horizontal space-valence associations: A meta-analysis

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106054
Jan Pohl , Alex Miklashevsky
{"title":"Vertical and horizontal space-valence associations: A meta-analysis","authors":"Jan Pohl ,&nbsp;Alex Miklashevsky","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research found associations between lower vs. upper space and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (vertical Space-Valence Associations, SVAs) and between the left vs. right side and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (horizontal SVAs). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of SVAs for both dimensions in behavioral studies. We tested the robustness of SVAs and examined factors potentially modulating them: participants’ culture, handedness, gender, age, the exact valence domain under study, the experimental task, type of stimuli, publication year, and statistics used. Articles were extracted from Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect in February 2021. Overall, 91 articles with 199 experiments and 21,951 participants were included in the final analysis.</div><div>We found robust evidence of SVAs in vertical (<em>r</em> = .440, <em>k</em> = 111 experiments) and horizontal dimensions (<em>r</em> = .310; <em>k</em> = 88 experiments), with little evidence for literature biases. The distribution of effect sizes was highly heterogeneous, even after subgroup analyses, which indicates unidentified factors varying across studies. Experiments on vertical SVAs explicitly asking participants to evaluate valence showed larger effect sizes than experiments where valence remained task-irrelevant. There was a robust effect of handedness on horizontal SVAs: Participants associated positive stimuli with the side of their dominant hand. There was also some evidence of cultural influences on the horizontal SVAs.</div><div>Overall, our meta-analysis revealed a hierarchy of factors modulating activation of SVAs, which includes both situated and embodied factors. It is, therefore, essential to focus on specific concept categories and contexts rather than consider abstract concepts in general.</div></div><div><h3>Public significance statement</h3><div>This meta-analysis revealed medium effects of space-valence associations: Upper/right space is associated with positive and lower/right space with negative concepts. On the vertical dimension, this effect is modulated by valence being task-relevant, e.g., directly asking people about valence results in stronger associations. For the horizontal dimension, left-handers robustly showed a reversed effect (i.e., left is good); horizontal space-valence associations might be even stronger in non-Western countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 106054"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425000545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research found associations between lower vs. upper space and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (vertical Space-Valence Associations, SVAs) and between the left vs. right side and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (horizontal SVAs). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of SVAs for both dimensions in behavioral studies. We tested the robustness of SVAs and examined factors potentially modulating them: participants’ culture, handedness, gender, age, the exact valence domain under study, the experimental task, type of stimuli, publication year, and statistics used. Articles were extracted from Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect in February 2021. Overall, 91 articles with 199 experiments and 21,951 participants were included in the final analysis.
We found robust evidence of SVAs in vertical (r = .440, k = 111 experiments) and horizontal dimensions (r = .310; k = 88 experiments), with little evidence for literature biases. The distribution of effect sizes was highly heterogeneous, even after subgroup analyses, which indicates unidentified factors varying across studies. Experiments on vertical SVAs explicitly asking participants to evaluate valence showed larger effect sizes than experiments where valence remained task-irrelevant. There was a robust effect of handedness on horizontal SVAs: Participants associated positive stimuli with the side of their dominant hand. There was also some evidence of cultural influences on the horizontal SVAs.
Overall, our meta-analysis revealed a hierarchy of factors modulating activation of SVAs, which includes both situated and embodied factors. It is, therefore, essential to focus on specific concept categories and contexts rather than consider abstract concepts in general.

Public significance statement

This meta-analysis revealed medium effects of space-valence associations: Upper/right space is associated with positive and lower/right space with negative concepts. On the vertical dimension, this effect is modulated by valence being task-relevant, e.g., directly asking people about valence results in stronger associations. For the horizontal dimension, left-handers robustly showed a reversed effect (i.e., left is good); horizontal space-valence associations might be even stronger in non-Western countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向和横向空间价价关联:一项元分析。
先前的研究发现了上下空间、负性刺激和正性刺激之间的对应关系(纵向空间效价关联),以及左右空间、负性刺激和正性刺激之间的对应关系(横向空间效价关联)。我们对行为研究中两个维度的SVAs进行了全面的meta分析。我们测试了SVAs的稳健性,并检查了可能调节它们的因素:参与者的文化、利手性、性别、年龄、所研究的确切价域、实验任务、刺激类型、出版年份和使用的统计数据。文章于2021年2月从Web of Science、PubMed和ScienceDirect中提取。总体而言,最终分析纳入了91篇文章,199个实验和21,951名参与者。我们在垂直(r =。440, k = 111实验)和水平维度(r =.310;K = 88次实验),几乎没有证据表明存在文献偏差。即使在亚组分析之后,效应量的分布也是高度异质性的,这表明未确定的因素在研究中存在差异。明确要求参与者评价效价的纵向SVAs实验比效价保持任务无关的实验显示出更大的效应。用手性对水平SVAs有显著的影响:参与者将积极刺激与他们的优势手的一侧联系起来。也有一些证据表明文化对横向SVAs有影响。总体而言,我们的荟萃分析揭示了调节SVAs激活的因素层次结构,其中包括位置因素和具身因素。因此,重点关注具体的概念类别和背景,而不是笼统地考虑抽象概念是至关重要的。公共意义声明:本meta分析揭示了空间效价关联的中介效应:上/右空间与积极概念相关,下/右空间与消极概念相关。在垂直维度上,效价与任务相关调节了这种效应,例如,直接询问人们效价会产生更强的关联。在水平维度上,左撇子表现出明显的反向效应(即左好);水平空间价相关性在非西方国家可能更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
Neural sensitivity to social feedback and adaptations to changing social contexts in adolescence Rethinking anorexia nervosa through the lens of control, compulsion and reward: Neurobiological insights into addiction-like features via the dopaminergic, endocannabinoid, and orexinergic systems − A narrative review On human synchrony: A systematic review of the origins of physiological and neural synchrony in parent–infant dyads (0–12 months) GENESIS: A Generative model of Episodic–Semantic Interaction Molecular connectivity studies of cerebral glucose metabolism and blood flow: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1