Effects of an mHealth-based psychological resilience intervention on psychological resilience, negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101357
Qianyu Zhang, Liping Wang, Jinghan Yang, Weichao Liu, Chengang Hong
{"title":"Effects of an mHealth-based psychological resilience intervention on psychological resilience, negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy","authors":"Qianyu Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Wang,&nbsp;Jinghan Yang,&nbsp;Weichao Liu,&nbsp;Chengang Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mental health problems are particularly acute in patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Traditional offline psychological interventions not only cause patients to feel fatigued from travelling, but also increase the risk of group aggregation of infections. The application of mobile healthcare provides great convenience for patients. However, most of the existing online psychological intervention studies have not focused on the phenomenon of limitation of their limb movement due to postoperative incision and PICC problems. Therefore, this study will combine the consideration of these characteristics to investigate the effectiveness of a 3-month online psychological resilience intervention in improving negative emotions and increasing the level of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an experimental research design, 70 breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy were recruited from two breast surgery wards of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province in June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ① patients older than 18 years old; ② patients with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer during postoperative chemotherapy; ③ patients with the ability to read and write in Chinese; ④ patients or their family members owning a smartphone; and ⑤ patients who voluntarily participated in this study. Exclusion criteria: (1) those who do not know the condition; (2) those with physical dysfunction; (3) those with previous history of psychological disorders and psychiatric illnesses; (4) those with understanding and communication disorders. Grouped by ward, patients in the control group received routine discharge care and follow-up, and patients in the intervention group used the psychological resilience applet on the basis of the control group. The sample size was calculated using Gpower 3.1 software, and the total sample size for both groups was finally determined to be 70 cases, taking into account the 10%-20% loss of follow-up rate. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Sixty-six patients completed the study, 34 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group. One case withdrew from the intervention group and three cases were lost in the control group at T1. Before the intervention (T0) there was no statistically significant difference between the total psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores and the scores of each dimension between the two groups of patients (P&gt;0.05). After the intervention (T1), the differences in psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores, and scores on all dimensions (except for the resilience and strength dimensions of psychological resilience) between the two groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study provides evidence that mHealth-based psychological resilience interventions show significant benefits in terms of increasing patients' levels of psychological resilience, reducing levels of anxiety and depression, and increasing levels of self-efficacy. Future research should further explore how to optimise interaction during the intervention to maintain patient engagement without causing fatigue.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mental health problems are particularly acute in patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Traditional offline psychological interventions not only cause patients to feel fatigued from travelling, but also increase the risk of group aggregation of infections. The application of mobile healthcare provides great convenience for patients. However, most of the existing online psychological intervention studies have not focused on the phenomenon of limitation of their limb movement due to postoperative incision and PICC problems. Therefore, this study will combine the consideration of these characteristics to investigate the effectiveness of a 3-month online psychological resilience intervention in improving negative emotions and increasing the level of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

Using an experimental research design, 70 breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy were recruited from two breast surgery wards of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province in June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ① patients older than 18 years old; ② patients with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer during postoperative chemotherapy; ③ patients with the ability to read and write in Chinese; ④ patients or their family members owning a smartphone; and ⑤ patients who voluntarily participated in this study. Exclusion criteria: (1) those who do not know the condition; (2) those with physical dysfunction; (3) those with previous history of psychological disorders and psychiatric illnesses; (4) those with understanding and communication disorders. Grouped by ward, patients in the control group received routine discharge care and follow-up, and patients in the intervention group used the psychological resilience applet on the basis of the control group. The sample size was calculated using Gpower 3.1 software, and the total sample size for both groups was finally determined to be 70 cases, taking into account the 10%-20% loss of follow-up rate. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.

Findings

Sixty-six patients completed the study, 34 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group. One case withdrew from the intervention group and three cases were lost in the control group at T1. Before the intervention (T0) there was no statistically significant difference between the total psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores and the scores of each dimension between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). After the intervention (T1), the differences in psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores, and scores on all dimensions (except for the resilience and strength dimensions of psychological resilience) between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).

Interpretation

This study provides evidence that mHealth-based psychological resilience interventions show significant benefits in terms of increasing patients' levels of psychological resilience, reducing levels of anxiety and depression, and increasing levels of self-efficacy. Future research should further explore how to optimise interaction during the intervention to maintain patient engagement without causing fatigue.

Funding

No.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Short term safety profile of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in adults aged ≥ 60 years in Australia Shifting the way we conceptualise, research and intervene childhood obesity in China and Southeast Asian countries Assessing socioeconomic disparities in emerging hybrid food environments: a cross-sectional analysis of the DIGIFOOD dashboard Impulse oscillometry-derived equation for prediction of abnormal FEV1/FVC ratio for COPD screening in Chinese population: a multicenter cross-sectional study Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccination programme in China: a modelling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1