{"title":"Tumescence and sharp versus electrocautery dissection in minimal access mastectomy: a real-world retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yiwen Lu, Xinyu Ou, Zhihan Liu, Shicheng Su","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tumescence and sharp or electrocautery techniques have been employed during skin flap development in minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction. Our study evaluated the impact of techniques on complications after this surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 5436 individuals undergoing NSM from 12 centers in China were identified. After exclusions and propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 1252 female breast cancer patients who underwent minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2022 were included. The effect of surgical techniques on the perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The level of significance was set at P< .05.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After PSM, we found that patients in the tumescence and sharp dissection group (n=313) experienced significantly lower rates of necrotic complications (5.8% vs 13.0%; P= .001), infection (2.6% vs 5.6%; P= .041), implant loss (0.3% vs 2.2%; P= .025), and had shorter mean operation time (median [IQR] min, 177.0 [132.0-219.0] min, and 201.0 [143.0-249.0] min; P< .001), compared with those in the electrocautery dissection group (n=939).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Tumescence and sharp dissection might be a better option in skip flap development during minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction, in regard to operation time and surgical complications. A limitation is the variation in surgeons’ skills across multiple centers.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>National Key Research and Development Program of China</span> (2023YFC3404500), the <span>Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (92057210, 82125017, 82173064, 92359302, 82322030), <span>Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou</span> (202103000070, 202201020479), and the <span>New Cornerstone Science Foundation</span> through the New Cornerstone Investigator Program and the XPLORER PRIZE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Tumescence and sharp or electrocautery techniques have been employed during skin flap development in minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction. Our study evaluated the impact of techniques on complications after this surgery.
Methods
In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 5436 individuals undergoing NSM from 12 centers in China were identified. After exclusions and propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 1252 female breast cancer patients who underwent minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2022 were included. The effect of surgical techniques on the perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The level of significance was set at P< .05.
Findings
After PSM, we found that patients in the tumescence and sharp dissection group (n=313) experienced significantly lower rates of necrotic complications (5.8% vs 13.0%; P= .001), infection (2.6% vs 5.6%; P= .041), implant loss (0.3% vs 2.2%; P= .025), and had shorter mean operation time (median [IQR] min, 177.0 [132.0-219.0] min, and 201.0 [143.0-249.0] min; P< .001), compared with those in the electrocautery dissection group (n=939).
Interpretation
Tumescence and sharp dissection might be a better option in skip flap development during minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction, in regard to operation time and surgical complications. A limitation is the variation in surgeons’ skills across multiple centers.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3404500), the Natural Science Foundation of China (92057210, 82125017, 82173064, 92359302, 82322030), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202103000070, 202201020479), and the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the New Cornerstone Investigator Program and the XPLORER PRIZE.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.