Tumescence and sharp versus electrocautery dissection in minimal access mastectomy: a real-world retrospective cohort study

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101342
Yiwen Lu, Xinyu Ou, Zhihan Liu, Shicheng Su
{"title":"Tumescence and sharp versus electrocautery dissection in minimal access mastectomy: a real-world retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yiwen Lu,&nbsp;Xinyu Ou,&nbsp;Zhihan Liu,&nbsp;Shicheng Su","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tumescence and sharp or electrocautery techniques have been employed during skin flap development in minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction. Our study evaluated the impact of techniques on complications after this surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 5436 individuals undergoing NSM from 12 centers in China were identified. After exclusions and propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 1252 female breast cancer patients who underwent minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2022 were included. The effect of surgical techniques on the perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The level of significance was set at P&lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After PSM, we found that patients in the tumescence and sharp dissection group (n=313) experienced significantly lower rates of necrotic complications (5.8% vs 13.0%; P= .001), infection (2.6% vs 5.6%; P= .041), implant loss (0.3% vs 2.2%; P= .025), and had shorter mean operation time (median [IQR] min, 177.0 [132.0-219.0] min, and 201.0 [143.0-249.0] min; P&lt; .001), compared with those in the electrocautery dissection group (n=939).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Tumescence and sharp dissection might be a better option in skip flap development during minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction, in regard to operation time and surgical complications. A limitation is the variation in surgeons’ skills across multiple centers.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>National Key Research and Development Program of China</span> (2023YFC3404500), the <span>Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (92057210, 82125017, 82173064, 92359302, 82322030), <span>Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou</span> (202103000070, 202201020479), and the <span>New Cornerstone Science Foundation</span> through the New Cornerstone Investigator Program and the XPLORER PRIZE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tumescence and sharp or electrocautery techniques have been employed during skin flap development in minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction. Our study evaluated the impact of techniques on complications after this surgery.

Methods

In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 5436 individuals undergoing NSM from 12 centers in China were identified. After exclusions and propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 1252 female breast cancer patients who underwent minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2022 were included. The effect of surgical techniques on the perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The level of significance was set at P< .05.

Findings

After PSM, we found that patients in the tumescence and sharp dissection group (n=313) experienced significantly lower rates of necrotic complications (5.8% vs 13.0%; P= .001), infection (2.6% vs 5.6%; P= .041), implant loss (0.3% vs 2.2%; P= .025), and had shorter mean operation time (median [IQR] min, 177.0 [132.0-219.0] min, and 201.0 [143.0-249.0] min; P< .001), compared with those in the electrocautery dissection group (n=939).

Interpretation

Tumescence and sharp dissection might be a better option in skip flap development during minimal access NSM with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction, in regard to operation time and surgical complications. A limitation is the variation in surgeons’ skills across multiple centers.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3404500), the Natural Science Foundation of China (92057210, 82125017, 82173064, 92359302, 82322030), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202103000070, 202201020479), and the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the New Cornerstone Investigator Program and the XPLORER PRIZE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小通道乳房切除术中的肿胀和尖锐解剖与电灼解剖:一项真实世界的回顾性队列研究
背景:在保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)并立即进行假乳重建的微创手术中,在皮瓣发育过程中采用肿胀、尖锐或电灼技术。我们的研究评估了手术后技术对并发症的影响。方法在这项真实世界的回顾性队列研究中,来自中国12个中心的5436名NSM患者被确定。在排除和倾向评分匹配(PSM)之后,2016年1月至2022年12月期间,共有1252名女性乳腺癌患者接受了最小通道NSM并立即进行假体乳房重建。采用logistic回归分析探讨手术技术对围手术期结局及术后并发症的影响。显著性水平设为P<;. 05。在PSM后,我们发现肿胀和尖锐夹层组(n=313)患者的坏死并发症发生率显著降低(5.8% vs 13.0%;P= .001),感染(2.6% vs 5.6%;P= 0.041),种植体损失(0.3% vs 2.2%;P= 0.025),平均手术时间较短(中位数[IQR] min, 177.0 [132.0-219.0] min, 201.0 [143.0-249.0] min;术中;.001),与电切组比较(n=939)。解释:考虑到手术时间和手术并发症,在小切口NSM即刻假乳重建中,肿胀和尖锐剥离可能是跳跃式皮瓣发展的更好选择。一个限制是外科医生在多个中心的技能存在差异。国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3404500),国家自然科学基金项目(92057210,82125017,82173064,92359302,82322030),广州市科技计划项目(202103000070,202201020479),新基石科学基金项目(新基石研究者计划和XPLORER奖)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Mass hepatitis C virus screening among persons in custody in Hong Kong: a modelling cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective cohort study G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination Social network distribution of HIV self-tests among MSM in Australia: a prospective, non-randomised trial Combating dengue using male Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes–lessons from Singapore's experience Efficacy and safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic MET exon 14-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: final results of a confirmatory Phase 3b study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1