Catching up or putting them down? An investigation of employee divergent reactions to coworker conscientiousness

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113106
Qingxiong Weng, Yanfen Wang, Xiujuan Wang, Huanyu Qin
{"title":"Catching up or putting them down? An investigation of employee divergent reactions to coworker conscientiousness","authors":"Qingxiong Weng,&nbsp;Yanfen Wang,&nbsp;Xiujuan Wang,&nbsp;Huanyu Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on conscientiousness has primarily focused on the consequences of employees possessing higher conscientiousness. However, it is equally important to understand how employees react to others' higher conscientiousness (<em>e.g.</em>, coworkers). Drawing from the social comparison theory, we attempt to reveal employees' emotional and behavioral reactions to their coworkers' higher conscientiousness. Using 210 employee-coworker dyadic data collected from China, we found that coworkers' higher conscientiousness leads focal employees to experience either relative deprivation or inspiration, which is shaped by the extent of the focal employees' zero-sum mindset. Furthermore, we found that these relative deprivation and inspiration emotions motivate focal employees to engage in social undermining and help-seeking behavior toward their conscientious coworkers. These findings enhance the understanding of the specific reactions of employees to others' higher conscientiousness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on conscientiousness has primarily focused on the consequences of employees possessing higher conscientiousness. However, it is equally important to understand how employees react to others' higher conscientiousness (e.g., coworkers). Drawing from the social comparison theory, we attempt to reveal employees' emotional and behavioral reactions to their coworkers' higher conscientiousness. Using 210 employee-coworker dyadic data collected from China, we found that coworkers' higher conscientiousness leads focal employees to experience either relative deprivation or inspiration, which is shaped by the extent of the focal employees' zero-sum mindset. Furthermore, we found that these relative deprivation and inspiration emotions motivate focal employees to engage in social undermining and help-seeking behavior toward their conscientious coworkers. These findings enhance the understanding of the specific reactions of employees to others' higher conscientiousness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赶上还是放下?员工对同事责任心的不同反应调查
关于责任心的研究主要集中在员工拥有较高责任心的后果上。然而,同样重要的是要了解员工如何对其他人(例如同事)的更高责任心做出反应。根据社会比较理论,我们试图揭示员工对其同事更高的责任心的情绪和行为反应。利用210名来自中国的员工-同事二元数据,我们发现,同事较高的责任心会导致焦点员工经历相对剥夺或灵感,这是由焦点员工的零和思维程度决定的。此外,我们发现这些相对剥夺和激励情绪激发了焦点型员工对有责任心的同事进行社会破坏和寻求帮助的行为。这些发现增强了对员工对他人更高责任心的具体反应的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The vanishing hours: Future temporal focus and the passage of time in the digital era Individual in online polarization: Development of the online polarized aggression scale (OPAS) Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1