Choice preferences for AI-based medication counselling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101403
Jialiang Feng , Yisong Yao , Xiaoqian Xia , Huirong Liu , Yibo Wu
{"title":"Choice preferences for AI-based medication counselling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment","authors":"Jialiang Feng ,&nbsp;Yisong Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Xia ,&nbsp;Huirong Liu ,&nbsp;Yibo Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require long-term and accuracy medication guidance, making it a promising tool for the management of COPD. Nevertheless, patient preferences for AI-based medication counselling in COPD management remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 325 patients were analyzed. We identified 6 attributes of AI-based medication counselling and utilized an orthogonal design to generate a selection set for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Questionnaires were collected from patients with COPD in Henan Province, comprising a general information questionnaire, DCE questionnaire, five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), medication literacy scale, and e-health scale. We employed a conditional logit regression model to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute and calculated their willingness to pay. Additionally, we determined that the 3-class model has the best data fit superiority by calculating the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and performed latent class analysis (LCA) to analyze the heterogeneity of people's preferences for AI-based medication counselling. Based on the results of LCA, we further used multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore the factors influencing patients' preferences for AI-based medication counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The conditional logit regression model reveals that patients prioritize the attributes of AI-based medication counseling in the following order of importance: accuracy, comprehensibility, consultation channels, presentation format, manual review, and cost. The calculation of WTP revealed that participants are willing to pay an additional 20.81 RMB for a boost in result accuracy from 60% to 100% and 14.33 RMB for an increase from 80% to 100%. Likewise, enhancing comprehensibility to fully understandable from incomprehensible or partially comprehensible garners an extra 13.85 RMB or 4.39 RMB, respectively. Latent class analysis categorized patients into three groups: Class1 (21.2%) favors human-reviewed consultations via websites and audio/dialogue; Class2 (59.7%) prefers app-based consultations without human review and presented with images; and Class3 (19.1%) is less concerned with consultation details but prioritizes unreviewed audio or dialogue formats. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that, among Class1 and Class2, gender (p=0.034) age (p=0.017) and e-health literacy scores (p=0.001) significantly influence classification, with females and older, more digitally literate individuals leaning towards Class1. Comparatively, Class1 versus Class3 analysis indicated that higher income (p=0.027) and the presence of other chronic diseases (p=0.005) significantly predict Class1 membership, suggesting that wealthier individuals or those with multiple health conditions are more likely to prefer Class1.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Currently, a significant majority of patients are receptive to AI-based medication counselling. Overall, people prefer AI-based medication counseling that is highly accurate and understandable, accessed through websites, presented in audio or dialogue form, manually reviewed, and low in cost. To effectively guide COPD patients with AI-based medication counseling, it's crucial to enhance the accuracy and clarity of consultation results. However, the study could not include all attributes related to AI-based medication counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101403"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require long-term and accuracy medication guidance, making it a promising tool for the management of COPD. Nevertheless, patient preferences for AI-based medication counselling in COPD management remain unclear.

Methods

Data from 325 patients were analyzed. We identified 6 attributes of AI-based medication counselling and utilized an orthogonal design to generate a selection set for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Questionnaires were collected from patients with COPD in Henan Province, comprising a general information questionnaire, DCE questionnaire, five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), medication literacy scale, and e-health scale. We employed a conditional logit regression model to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute and calculated their willingness to pay. Additionally, we determined that the 3-class model has the best data fit superiority by calculating the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and performed latent class analysis (LCA) to analyze the heterogeneity of people's preferences for AI-based medication counselling. Based on the results of LCA, we further used multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore the factors influencing patients' preferences for AI-based medication counselling.

Findings

The conditional logit regression model reveals that patients prioritize the attributes of AI-based medication counseling in the following order of importance: accuracy, comprehensibility, consultation channels, presentation format, manual review, and cost. The calculation of WTP revealed that participants are willing to pay an additional 20.81 RMB for a boost in result accuracy from 60% to 100% and 14.33 RMB for an increase from 80% to 100%. Likewise, enhancing comprehensibility to fully understandable from incomprehensible or partially comprehensible garners an extra 13.85 RMB or 4.39 RMB, respectively. Latent class analysis categorized patients into three groups: Class1 (21.2%) favors human-reviewed consultations via websites and audio/dialogue; Class2 (59.7%) prefers app-based consultations without human review and presented with images; and Class3 (19.1%) is less concerned with consultation details but prioritizes unreviewed audio or dialogue formats. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that, among Class1 and Class2, gender (p=0.034) age (p=0.017) and e-health literacy scores (p=0.001) significantly influence classification, with females and older, more digitally literate individuals leaning towards Class1. Comparatively, Class1 versus Class3 analysis indicated that higher income (p=0.027) and the presence of other chronic diseases (p=0.005) significantly predict Class1 membership, suggesting that wealthier individuals or those with multiple health conditions are more likely to prefer Class1.

Interpretation

Currently, a significant majority of patients are receptive to AI-based medication counselling. Overall, people prefer AI-based medication counseling that is highly accurate and understandable, accessed through websites, presented in audio or dialogue form, manually reviewed, and low in cost. To effectively guide COPD patients with AI-based medication counseling, it's crucial to enhance the accuracy and clarity of consultation results. However, the study could not include all attributes related to AI-based medication counselling.

Funding

None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者基于人工智能的药物咨询的选择偏好:离散选择实验
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者需要长期和准确的用药指导,这使得它成为治疗COPD的一个很有前途的工具。然而,患者在COPD治疗中对基于人工智能的药物咨询的偏好仍不清楚。方法对325例患者资料进行分析。我们确定了基于人工智能的药物咨询的6个属性,并利用正交设计生成离散选择实验(DCE)的选择集。对河南省慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行问卷调查,包括一般信息问卷、DCE问卷、五级EuroQol五维问卷(EQ-5D-5L)、用药素养量表和电子健康量表。我们采用了一个条件logit回归模型来估计患者报告的对每个属性的偏好,并计算他们的支付意愿。此外,我们通过计算赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)确定了3类模型具有最佳的数据拟合优势,并进行了潜在类分析(latent class analysis, LCA)来分析人们对基于人工智能的药物咨询偏好的异质性。在LCA结果的基础上,我们进一步采用多项logistic回归分析,探讨患者对人工智能药物咨询偏好的影响因素。条件logit回归模型显示,患者对人工智能药物咨询属性的重视程度依次为:准确性、可理解性、咨询渠道、呈现形式、人工审核、成本。WTP的计算显示,参与者愿意为将结果准确率从60%提高到100%额外支付20.81元,为将结果准确率从80%提高到100%额外支付14.33元。同样,从不理解或部分理解提升到完全理解,分别可以获得13.85元或4.39元的额外收入。潜在类别分析将患者分为三组:一类(21.2%)倾向于通过网站和音频/对话进行人工审核咨询;Class2(59.7%)更喜欢基于应用程序的咨询,不需要人工审核,并提供图像;第三类(19.1%)不太关心咨询细节,但优先考虑未经审查的音频或对话格式。多项逻辑回归分析显示,在Class1和Class2中,性别(p=0.034)、年龄(p=0.017)和电子卫生素养分数(p=0.001)显著影响分类,女性和年龄较大、数字素养较高的个体倾向于Class1。相比之下,Class1和Class3分析表明,高收入(p=0.027)和其他慢性疾病的存在(p=0.005)显著预测了Class1会员资格,这表明较富裕的个人或有多种健康状况的人更有可能选择Class1。目前,绝大多数患者接受基于人工智能的药物咨询。总的来说,人们更喜欢基于人工智能的药物咨询,因为它高度准确和可理解,可以通过网站访问,以音频或对话形式呈现,人工审核,成本低。为有效指导COPD患者进行人工智能药物咨询,提高咨询结果的准确性和清晰度至关重要。然而,该研究不能包括与基于人工智能的药物咨询相关的所有属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Mass hepatitis C virus screening among persons in custody in Hong Kong: a modelling cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective cohort study G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination Social network distribution of HIV self-tests among MSM in Australia: a prospective, non-randomised trial Combating dengue using male Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes–lessons from Singapore's experience Efficacy and safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic MET exon 14-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: final results of a confirmatory Phase 3b study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1