Choice preferences for AI-based medication counselling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101403
Jialiang Feng , Yisong Yao , Xiaoqian Xia , Huirong Liu , Yibo Wu
{"title":"Choice preferences for AI-based medication counselling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment","authors":"Jialiang Feng ,&nbsp;Yisong Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Xia ,&nbsp;Huirong Liu ,&nbsp;Yibo Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require long-term and accuracy medication guidance, making it a promising tool for the management of COPD. Nevertheless, patient preferences for AI-based medication counselling in COPD management remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 325 patients were analyzed. We identified 6 attributes of AI-based medication counselling and utilized an orthogonal design to generate a selection set for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Questionnaires were collected from patients with COPD in Henan Province, comprising a general information questionnaire, DCE questionnaire, five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), medication literacy scale, and e-health scale. We employed a conditional logit regression model to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute and calculated their willingness to pay. Additionally, we determined that the 3-class model has the best data fit superiority by calculating the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and performed latent class analysis (LCA) to analyze the heterogeneity of people's preferences for AI-based medication counselling. Based on the results of LCA, we further used multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore the factors influencing patients' preferences for AI-based medication counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The conditional logit regression model reveals that patients prioritize the attributes of AI-based medication counseling in the following order of importance: accuracy, comprehensibility, consultation channels, presentation format, manual review, and cost. The calculation of WTP revealed that participants are willing to pay an additional 20.81 RMB for a boost in result accuracy from 60% to 100% and 14.33 RMB for an increase from 80% to 100%. Likewise, enhancing comprehensibility to fully understandable from incomprehensible or partially comprehensible garners an extra 13.85 RMB or 4.39 RMB, respectively. Latent class analysis categorized patients into three groups: Class1 (21.2%) favors human-reviewed consultations via websites and audio/dialogue; Class2 (59.7%) prefers app-based consultations without human review and presented with images; and Class3 (19.1%) is less concerned with consultation details but prioritizes unreviewed audio or dialogue formats. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that, among Class1 and Class2, gender (p=0.034) age (p=0.017) and e-health literacy scores (p=0.001) significantly influence classification, with females and older, more digitally literate individuals leaning towards Class1. Comparatively, Class1 versus Class3 analysis indicated that higher income (p=0.027) and the presence of other chronic diseases (p=0.005) significantly predict Class1 membership, suggesting that wealthier individuals or those with multiple health conditions are more likely to prefer Class1.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Currently, a significant majority of patients are receptive to AI-based medication counselling. Overall, people prefer AI-based medication counseling that is highly accurate and understandable, accessed through websites, presented in audio or dialogue form, manually reviewed, and low in cost. To effectively guide COPD patients with AI-based medication counseling, it's crucial to enhance the accuracy and clarity of consultation results. However, the study could not include all attributes related to AI-based medication counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101403"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require long-term and accuracy medication guidance, making it a promising tool for the management of COPD. Nevertheless, patient preferences for AI-based medication counselling in COPD management remain unclear.

Methods

Data from 325 patients were analyzed. We identified 6 attributes of AI-based medication counselling and utilized an orthogonal design to generate a selection set for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Questionnaires were collected from patients with COPD in Henan Province, comprising a general information questionnaire, DCE questionnaire, five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), medication literacy scale, and e-health scale. We employed a conditional logit regression model to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute and calculated their willingness to pay. Additionally, we determined that the 3-class model has the best data fit superiority by calculating the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and performed latent class analysis (LCA) to analyze the heterogeneity of people's preferences for AI-based medication counselling. Based on the results of LCA, we further used multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore the factors influencing patients' preferences for AI-based medication counselling.

Findings

The conditional logit regression model reveals that patients prioritize the attributes of AI-based medication counseling in the following order of importance: accuracy, comprehensibility, consultation channels, presentation format, manual review, and cost. The calculation of WTP revealed that participants are willing to pay an additional 20.81 RMB for a boost in result accuracy from 60% to 100% and 14.33 RMB for an increase from 80% to 100%. Likewise, enhancing comprehensibility to fully understandable from incomprehensible or partially comprehensible garners an extra 13.85 RMB or 4.39 RMB, respectively. Latent class analysis categorized patients into three groups: Class1 (21.2%) favors human-reviewed consultations via websites and audio/dialogue; Class2 (59.7%) prefers app-based consultations without human review and presented with images; and Class3 (19.1%) is less concerned with consultation details but prioritizes unreviewed audio or dialogue formats. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that, among Class1 and Class2, gender (p=0.034) age (p=0.017) and e-health literacy scores (p=0.001) significantly influence classification, with females and older, more digitally literate individuals leaning towards Class1. Comparatively, Class1 versus Class3 analysis indicated that higher income (p=0.027) and the presence of other chronic diseases (p=0.005) significantly predict Class1 membership, suggesting that wealthier individuals or those with multiple health conditions are more likely to prefer Class1.

Interpretation

Currently, a significant majority of patients are receptive to AI-based medication counselling. Overall, people prefer AI-based medication counseling that is highly accurate and understandable, accessed through websites, presented in audio or dialogue form, manually reviewed, and low in cost. To effectively guide COPD patients with AI-based medication counseling, it's crucial to enhance the accuracy and clarity of consultation results. However, the study could not include all attributes related to AI-based medication counselling.

Funding

None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Short term safety profile of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in adults aged ≥ 60 years in Australia Shifting the way we conceptualise, research and intervene childhood obesity in China and Southeast Asian countries Assessing socioeconomic disparities in emerging hybrid food environments: a cross-sectional analysis of the DIGIFOOD dashboard Impulse oscillometry-derived equation for prediction of abnormal FEV1/FVC ratio for COPD screening in Chinese population: a multicenter cross-sectional study Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccination programme in China: a modelling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1