Prospective study on stereotactic body radiation therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101302
Victor Ho-Fun Lee , Tiffany Cho-Lam Wong , Varut Vardhanabhuti , Ka-On Lam , Horace Cheuk-Wai Choi , Keith Wan-Hang Chiu , Patty Pui-Ying Ho , Dennis Kwok-Chuen Leung , Matthew Ho-Man Szeto , Kwok-Fung Choi , See-Ching Chan , To-Wai Leung , Pek-Lan Khong , Chung-Mau Lo
{"title":"Prospective study on stereotactic body radiation therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Victor Ho-Fun Lee ,&nbsp;Tiffany Cho-Lam Wong ,&nbsp;Varut Vardhanabhuti ,&nbsp;Ka-On Lam ,&nbsp;Horace Cheuk-Wai Choi ,&nbsp;Keith Wan-Hang Chiu ,&nbsp;Patty Pui-Ying Ho ,&nbsp;Dennis Kwok-Chuen Leung ,&nbsp;Matthew Ho-Man Szeto ,&nbsp;Kwok-Fung Choi ,&nbsp;See-Ching Chan ,&nbsp;To-Wai Leung ,&nbsp;Pek-Lan Khong ,&nbsp;Chung-Mau Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is effective for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its role as a bridging therapy before deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our institution conducted a prospective study on SBRT before DDLT for 32 HCC patients within University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria as the first cohort, staged with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and 11C-acetate (ACC) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) (dual-tracer) positron-emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT), followed by SBRT of 35–50 Gy in 5 fractions. They were followed up with the same imaging modalities afterwards while awaiting DDLT. The results were published in June 2024. In view of the encouraging treatment outcomes, SBRT before DDLT has become a routine clinical practice in our institution and the study has been carried on without dual-tracer PET-CT imaging for all subsequent patients recruited prospectively for another 39 patients following revised sample size estimation. Co-primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs) by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety, and others. The trial is registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04186234</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between July 1, 2015 until October 31, 2023, 71 patients with 118 HCC lesions were recruited with a median follow-up duration of 62.9 months (IQR 36.5–95.0). The median dose of SBRT was 45Gy (IQR 37.5–50). Both the median PFS and OS were not reached. The 5-year PFS and OS were 57.2% (95% CI 44.3%–70.1%) and 62.3% (95% CI 49.8%–74.8%), respectively. In terms of number of patients, ORRs were in 73.2% (53 patients) by RECIST 1.1 and 77.5% (55 patients) by mRECIST. In terms of number of lesions, ORRs were 78.0% (92 lesions) by RECIST 1.1 and 82.2% (97 lesions) by mRECIST. Thirty-four patients (47.9%) with 54 lesions (45.8%) received DDLT, of whom 14 patients (41.1%) with 31 lesions (57.4%) exhibited pathologic complete response. Univariable analyses revealed ≤2 lesions (vs 3) (p=0.046), partial response (PR) by either RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST after SBRT (p=0.001), and DDLT (p=0.001) were prognostic of PFS, while tumours within Milan’s criteria (p=0.004), PR after SBRT (p=0.013) and DDLT (p&lt;0.001) were prognostic of OS. Multivariable analyses revealed that PR after SBRT (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.55; p=0.002) and DDLT (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12–0.64; p=0.001) was prognostic of PFS, while tumours within Milan’s criteria (HR 0.33, 95% 0.17–0.71; p=0.011), PR after SBRT (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17–0.80; p=0.011), and DDLT (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.41; p&lt;0.001) were prognostic of OS. One patient developed grade 3 peptic ulcer treated with distal gastrectomy during DDLT and one patient had grade 3 ascites after SBRT resolved after drainage. Eight and four patients died of progressive HCC before and after DDLT, respectively. Another one died of postoperative complications and liver graft failure soon after DDLT.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our study represents the world’s largest prospective cohort demonstrating a high objective and pathological response, promising survival and safety outcomes of SBRT before DDLT for HCC. Prognostic subgroups were identified which may guide future patient selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101302"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524002967","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is effective for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its role as a bridging therapy before deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) remains unclear.

Methods

Our institution conducted a prospective study on SBRT before DDLT for 32 HCC patients within University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria as the first cohort, staged with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and 11C-acetate (ACC) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) (dual-tracer) positron-emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT), followed by SBRT of 35–50 Gy in 5 fractions. They were followed up with the same imaging modalities afterwards while awaiting DDLT. The results were published in June 2024. In view of the encouraging treatment outcomes, SBRT before DDLT has become a routine clinical practice in our institution and the study has been carried on without dual-tracer PET-CT imaging for all subsequent patients recruited prospectively for another 39 patients following revised sample size estimation. Co-primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs) by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety, and others. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04186234.

Findings

Between July 1, 2015 until October 31, 2023, 71 patients with 118 HCC lesions were recruited with a median follow-up duration of 62.9 months (IQR 36.5–95.0). The median dose of SBRT was 45Gy (IQR 37.5–50). Both the median PFS and OS were not reached. The 5-year PFS and OS were 57.2% (95% CI 44.3%–70.1%) and 62.3% (95% CI 49.8%–74.8%), respectively. In terms of number of patients, ORRs were in 73.2% (53 patients) by RECIST 1.1 and 77.5% (55 patients) by mRECIST. In terms of number of lesions, ORRs were 78.0% (92 lesions) by RECIST 1.1 and 82.2% (97 lesions) by mRECIST. Thirty-four patients (47.9%) with 54 lesions (45.8%) received DDLT, of whom 14 patients (41.1%) with 31 lesions (57.4%) exhibited pathologic complete response. Univariable analyses revealed ≤2 lesions (vs 3) (p=0.046), partial response (PR) by either RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST after SBRT (p=0.001), and DDLT (p=0.001) were prognostic of PFS, while tumours within Milan’s criteria (p=0.004), PR after SBRT (p=0.013) and DDLT (p<0.001) were prognostic of OS. Multivariable analyses revealed that PR after SBRT (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.55; p=0.002) and DDLT (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12–0.64; p=0.001) was prognostic of PFS, while tumours within Milan’s criteria (HR 0.33, 95% 0.17–0.71; p=0.011), PR after SBRT (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17–0.80; p=0.011), and DDLT (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.41; p<0.001) were prognostic of OS. One patient developed grade 3 peptic ulcer treated with distal gastrectomy during DDLT and one patient had grade 3 ascites after SBRT resolved after drainage. Eight and four patients died of progressive HCC before and after DDLT, respectively. Another one died of postoperative complications and liver graft failure soon after DDLT.

Interpretation

Our study represents the world’s largest prospective cohort demonstrating a high objective and pathological response, promising survival and safety outcomes of SBRT before DDLT for HCC. Prognostic subgroups were identified which may guide future patient selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝细胞癌肝移植前立体定向放射治疗的前瞻性研究
背景:立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)对肝细胞癌(HCC)有效。它在死亡供体肝移植(DDLT)前作为桥接治疗的作用尚不清楚。方法我们的研究机构对32例符合加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)标准的HCC患者进行了DDLT前SBRT的前瞻性研究,作为第一队列,采用加多西特二钠增强MRI和11c -醋酸酯(ACC)和18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)(双示踪剂)正电子发射断层扫描与计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)分期,然后进行35-50 Gy的5次SBRT。他们在等待DDLT期间接受相同的影像学随访。研究结果于2024年6月公布。鉴于令人鼓舞的治疗结果,在DDLT之前进行SBRT已成为我们机构的常规临床实践,并且对所有后续患者进行了无双示踪PET-CT成像的研究,并根据修订的样本量估计对另外39例患者进行了前瞻性招募。共同主要终点是RECIST 1.1和mRECIST的无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(orr)。次要终点是总生存期(OS)、安全性和其他。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04186234。研究结果:2015年7月1日至2023年10月31日,纳入71例HCC患者,共118个HCC病变,中位随访时间为62.9个月(IQR为36.5-95.0)。SBRT的中位剂量为45Gy (IQR 37.5-50)。中位PFS和OS均未达到。5年PFS和OS分别为57.2% (95% CI 44.3%-70.1%)和62.3% (95% CI 49.8%-74.8%)。从患者数量来看,RECIST 1.1组的orr为73.2%(53例),mRECIST组为77.5%(55例)。在病变数量方面,RECIST 1.1的orr为78.0%(92个病变),mRECIST的orr为82.2%(97个病变)。34例患者(47.9%)54个病灶(45.8%)接受了DDLT治疗,其中14例患者(41.1%)31个病灶(57.4%)表现病理完全缓解。单变量分析显示≤2个病变(vs 3个)(p=0.046), SBRT后RECIST 1.1或mRECIST的部分缓解(PR) (p=0.001)和DDLT (p=0.001)是PFS的预后,而符合米兰标准的肿瘤(p=0.004), SBRT后PR (p=0.013)和DDLT (p<0.001)是OS的预后。多变量分析显示,SBRT后的PR (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.55;p=0.002)和DDLT (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.64;p=0.001)是PFS的预后因素,而符合Milan标准的肿瘤(HR 0.33, 95% 0.17-0.71;p=0.011), SBRT后PR (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.80;p=0.011), DDLT (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.41;p < 0.001)是OS的预后因素。1例患者在DDLT期间采用远端胃切除术治疗后出现3级消化性溃疡,1例患者在SBRT引流后消退后出现3级腹水。DDLT前后分别有8例和4例患者死于进展性HCC。另1例死于术后并发症和肝移植衰竭。我们的研究代表了世界上最大的前瞻性队列研究,证明了高客观和病理反应,在肝癌DDLT治疗前SBRT的生存和安全性结果很有希望。确定了预后亚组,这可以指导未来的患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual, rifabutin-based triple, and bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori rescue treatment: a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised trial Beyond the debate: toward pragmatic evaluation of Australia's social media age restrictions Associations of plasma GFAP and P-tau217 with imaging ATN markers and cognitive decline across Centiloid scales Pacific pathways for inclusive global health Within-summer variation in the heat-related emergency department visits among older adults in South Korea: a population-based case-crossover study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1