Plasma metabolite biomarker identification study for the early detection of gastric cancer

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101322
Juan Zhu , Yida Huang , Bin Liu , Xue Li , Li Yuan , Le Wang , Kun Qian , Yingying Mao , Lingbin Du , Xiangdong Cheng
{"title":"Plasma metabolite biomarker identification study for the early detection of gastric cancer","authors":"Juan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yida Huang ,&nbsp;Bin Liu ,&nbsp;Xue Li ,&nbsp;Li Yuan ,&nbsp;Le Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Qian ,&nbsp;Yingying Mao ,&nbsp;Lingbin Du ,&nbsp;Xiangdong Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent and the fifth deadliest cancer worldwide, and timely diagnosis of GC contributes to an increased survival rate. However, current detection methods for GC mainly rely on gastroscopy examination, limited by relatively low compliance. We attempted to identify plasma metabolite biomarkers and develop a diagnostic model for GC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 597 subjects, including healthy controls and GC patients were recruited from multiple centers in China. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based metabolomics methods were used to characterize the subjects’ plasma metabolic profiles and to screen and validate the GC biomarkers. Five machine learning algorithms (neural network, support vector machine, ridge regression, lasso regression and Naïve Bayes) were used to build a diagnostic model. We compared the performance of the metabolic panel with risk factors and clinical protein biomarkers (CA724, CA199, CA242, CA125, CEA and AFP), involving sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC and clinical net benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A plasma metabolite biomarker panel consisting of 6 metabolites was constructed and identified for GC diagnosis. Among the five machine learning algorithms, the neural network algorithm demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, achieving AUC of 0.982 (95% CI: 0.965–0.998) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.931–0.970) in the discovery and validation dataset, respectively. The panel's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95% CI) were 0.940 (0.825–0.984), 0.936 (0.861–0.974), and 0.938 (0.881–0.969) in the discovery set, and 0.925 (0.881–0.954), 0.867 (0.814–0.907), and 0.896 (0.864–0.922) in the validation set, respectively. The panel also exhibited superior diagnostic performance in detecting early-stage GC, with the ridge regression algorithm achieving the best performance (AUC: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.965–0.998 and 0.951, 0.931–0.970 in the discovery and validation dataset). This panel significantly outperforms clinical protein biomarkers in sensitivity. For instance, CA724, the most sensitive clinical biomarker for GC, showed sensitivities of only 0.240 (95% CI: 0.131–0.382) in the discovery dataset and 0.148 (95% CI: 0.103–0.203) in the validation dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The discovered and validated serum metabolite biomarker panel exhibits good diagnostic performance for the early detection of GC, highlighting the potential in clinical practice for GC diagnosis and offering insights into the metabolic characterization of diseases including but not limited to GC.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was supported by grants from the <span>Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province</span> (2024KY050), <span>Zhejiang Cancer Hospital's National Natural Science Foundation</span> Cultivation Fund (PY2022042) and <span>Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Youth Research Fund</span> (QN202201).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101322"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660652400316X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent and the fifth deadliest cancer worldwide, and timely diagnosis of GC contributes to an increased survival rate. However, current detection methods for GC mainly rely on gastroscopy examination, limited by relatively low compliance. We attempted to identify plasma metabolite biomarkers and develop a diagnostic model for GC.

Methods

A total of 597 subjects, including healthy controls and GC patients were recruited from multiple centers in China. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based metabolomics methods were used to characterize the subjects’ plasma metabolic profiles and to screen and validate the GC biomarkers. Five machine learning algorithms (neural network, support vector machine, ridge regression, lasso regression and Naïve Bayes) were used to build a diagnostic model. We compared the performance of the metabolic panel with risk factors and clinical protein biomarkers (CA724, CA199, CA242, CA125, CEA and AFP), involving sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC and clinical net benefit.

Findings

A plasma metabolite biomarker panel consisting of 6 metabolites was constructed and identified for GC diagnosis. Among the five machine learning algorithms, the neural network algorithm demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, achieving AUC of 0.982 (95% CI: 0.965–0.998) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.931–0.970) in the discovery and validation dataset, respectively. The panel's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95% CI) were 0.940 (0.825–0.984), 0.936 (0.861–0.974), and 0.938 (0.881–0.969) in the discovery set, and 0.925 (0.881–0.954), 0.867 (0.814–0.907), and 0.896 (0.864–0.922) in the validation set, respectively. The panel also exhibited superior diagnostic performance in detecting early-stage GC, with the ridge regression algorithm achieving the best performance (AUC: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.965–0.998 and 0.951, 0.931–0.970 in the discovery and validation dataset). This panel significantly outperforms clinical protein biomarkers in sensitivity. For instance, CA724, the most sensitive clinical biomarker for GC, showed sensitivities of only 0.240 (95% CI: 0.131–0.382) in the discovery dataset and 0.148 (95% CI: 0.103–0.203) in the validation dataset.

Interpretation

The discovered and validated serum metabolite biomarker panel exhibits good diagnostic performance for the early detection of GC, highlighting the potential in clinical practice for GC diagnosis and offering insights into the metabolic characterization of diseases including but not limited to GC.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province (2024KY050), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital's National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Fund (PY2022042) and Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Youth Research Fund (QN202201).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆代谢物生物标志物鉴定对胃癌早期检测的研究
胃癌(胃癌)是世界上第五大流行和第五大致命的癌症,及时诊断胃癌有助于提高生存率。然而,目前胃癌的检测方法主要依靠胃镜检查,依从性较低。我们试图鉴定血浆代谢物生物标志物,并建立GC的诊断模型。方法从全国多个中心招募597名受试者,包括健康对照和胃癌患者。使用基于超高效液相色谱-质谱的代谢组学方法来表征受试者的血浆代谢谱,并筛选和验证GC生物标志物。采用5种机器学习算法(神经网络、支持向量机、ridge回归、lasso回归和Naïve Bayes)构建诊断模型。我们比较了代谢组与危险因素和临床蛋白质生物标志物(CA724、CA199、CA242、CA125、CEA和AFP)的表现,包括敏感性、特异性、准确性、AUC和临床净收益。构建并鉴定了由6种代谢物组成的血浆代谢物生物标志物组,用于GC诊断。在5种机器学习算法中,神经网络算法的诊断性能最好,在发现和验证数据集中的AUC分别为0.982 (95% CI: 0.965-0.998)和0.951 (95% CI: 0.931-0.970)。发现组的灵敏度、特异性和准确度(95% CI)分别为0.940(0.825-0.984)、0.936(0.861-0.974)和0.938(0.881-0.969),验证组的灵敏度、特异性和准确度分别为0.925(0.881-0.954)、0.867(0.814-0.907)和0.896(0.864-0.922)。在发现和验证数据集中,脊回归算法的诊断效果最好(AUC: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.965-0.998, 0.951, 0.931-0.970)。该小组在敏感性方面明显优于临床蛋白质生物标志物。例如,CA724是最敏感的GC临床生物标志物,在发现数据集中的敏感性仅为0.240 (95% CI: 0.131-0.382),在验证数据集中的敏感性仅为0.148 (95% CI: 0.103-0.203)。该发现和验证的血清代谢物生物标志物面板在早期检测GC方面表现出良好的诊断性能,突出了GC诊断在临床实践中的潜力,并为包括但不限于GC的疾病的代谢特征提供了见解。本研究由浙江省医药卫生科研计划项目(2024KY050)、浙江省肿瘤医院国家自然科学基金培育基金(PY2022042)和浙江省肿瘤医院青年科研基金(QN202201)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Mass hepatitis C virus screening among persons in custody in Hong Kong: a modelling cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective cohort study G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination Social network distribution of HIV self-tests among MSM in Australia: a prospective, non-randomised trial Combating dengue using male Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes–lessons from Singapore's experience Efficacy and safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic MET exon 14-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: final results of a confirmatory Phase 3b study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1