Clinical and molecular characteristics, therapeutic strategy, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101393
Xiangran Feng, Yi Xiang
{"title":"Clinical and molecular characteristics, therapeutic strategy, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations","authors":"Xiangran Feng,&nbsp;Yi Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>BRAF oncogene is a rare genetic alteration in NSCLC. Acquired BRAF mutations are an emerging resistance mechanism to EGFR TKIs. The differences in clinical and genetic characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes in NSCLC patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations are still poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From Oct 2017 to Dec 2023, 10, 211 lung cancer patients at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were reviewed. 88 primary BRAF-mutated and 15 acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR TKIs were included in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Primary BRAF-mutated patients preferentially occurred in the elderly (median age: 67 versus 61, p=0.015), males (53.4% vs 26.7%, p=0.056), former/current smokers (36.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.033), non-adenocarcinoma (11.4% vs 0%, P=0.351) compared to acquired BRAF-mutated patient. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in terms of gender (males: 33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012), smoking history (22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063), and histological types (adenocarcinomas: 100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028). The clinical characteristics between primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients were similar. The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations (30.7% and 93.3%). And the genotype of concomitant EGFR mutation differed. In the acquired BRAF-mutated cohorts, the genotype of EGFR mutations was more complex than primary and contained more dual EGFR mutations (35.7%). For primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients, no matter what kinds of therapies, the EGFR 19del patients had a better prognosis than non-19del patients, and the first line mPFS was NR and 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3 months) (p=0.0062), respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib plus 3<sup>rd</sup> EGFR TKIs improved the prognosis of primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients, achieving ORR and mPFS of 100% (3/3) and 12 months. For acquired co-mutated patients, the mPFS for 5 patients was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-11.8 months). No new safety concerns and &gt; grade 3 AEs were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in gender, smoking history, and histological types. The primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients showed similar clinical characteristics but different co-mutated EGFR genotypes. Triple-target therapy (dabrafenib, trametinib plus 3<sup>rd</sup> EGFR TKIs) could be considered the preferential regimen for acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated NSCLC patients. As for the primary BRAF/EGFR 19del co-mutated patients, the preferred first-line treatments still are EGFR TKIs -based targeted therapies in real-world clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101393"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

BRAF oncogene is a rare genetic alteration in NSCLC. Acquired BRAF mutations are an emerging resistance mechanism to EGFR TKIs. The differences in clinical and genetic characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes in NSCLC patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations are still poorly understood.

Methods

From Oct 2017 to Dec 2023, 10, 211 lung cancer patients at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were reviewed. 88 primary BRAF-mutated and 15 acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR TKIs were included in the study.

Findings

Primary BRAF-mutated patients preferentially occurred in the elderly (median age: 67 versus 61, p=0.015), males (53.4% vs 26.7%, p=0.056), former/current smokers (36.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.033), non-adenocarcinoma (11.4% vs 0%, P=0.351) compared to acquired BRAF-mutated patient. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in terms of gender (males: 33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012), smoking history (22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063), and histological types (adenocarcinomas: 100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028). The clinical characteristics between primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients were similar. The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations (30.7% and 93.3%). And the genotype of concomitant EGFR mutation differed. In the acquired BRAF-mutated cohorts, the genotype of EGFR mutations was more complex than primary and contained more dual EGFR mutations (35.7%). For primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients, no matter what kinds of therapies, the EGFR 19del patients had a better prognosis than non-19del patients, and the first line mPFS was NR and 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3 months) (p=0.0062), respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib plus 3rd EGFR TKIs improved the prognosis of primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients, achieving ORR and mPFS of 100% (3/3) and 12 months. For acquired co-mutated patients, the mPFS for 5 patients was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-11.8 months). No new safety concerns and > grade 3 AEs were noted.

Interpretation

The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in gender, smoking history, and histological types. The primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients showed similar clinical characteristics but different co-mutated EGFR genotypes. Triple-target therapy (dabrafenib, trametinib plus 3rd EGFR TKIs) could be considered the preferential regimen for acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated NSCLC patients. As for the primary BRAF/EGFR 19del co-mutated patients, the preferred first-line treatments still are EGFR TKIs -based targeted therapies in real-world clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性和获得性BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床和分子特征、治疗策略和预后
braf癌基因在非小细胞肺癌中是一种罕见的基因改变。获得性BRAF突变是一种新兴的EGFR TKIs耐药机制。原发性和获得性BRAF突变的NSCLC患者的临床和遗传特征、治疗策略和结果的差异仍然知之甚少。方法对2017年10月至2023年12月上海瑞金医院收治的10211例肺癌患者进行回顾性分析。88例原发性braf突变和15例获得性braf突变的对EGFR TKIs耐药的NSCLC患者被纳入研究。与获得性braf突变患者相比,原发性braf突变患者优先发生在老年人(中位年龄:67对61,p=0.015)、男性(53.4%对26.7%,p=0.056)、曾经/现在吸烟者(36.5%对6.7%,p=0.033)、非腺癌患者(11.4%对0%,p= 0.351)。原发性BRAF/EGFR共突变组与非EGFR共突变组在性别(男性:33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012)、吸烟史(22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063)和组织学类型(腺癌:100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028)方面存在显著差异。原发性和获得性BRAF/EGFR共突变患者的临床特征相似。原发性和获得性braf突变的NSCLC患者中最常见的共存癌基因是EGFR突变(30.7%和93.3%)。同时发生EGFR突变的基因型不同。在获得性braf突变队列中,EGFR突变的基因型比原发突变更复杂,包含更多的双EGFR突变(35.7%)。对于原发性BRAF/EGFR共突变患者,无论采用何种治疗方法,EGFR 19del患者的预后均优于非19del患者,一线mPFS分别为NR和9.0个月(95% CI: 7.7 ~ 10.3个月)(p=0.0062)。达非尼和曲美替尼加3 EGFR TKIs改善了原发性BRAF/EGFR非19del共突变患者的预后,ORR和mPFS分别为100%(3/3)和12个月。对于获得性共突变患者,5例患者的mPFS为8.6个月(95% CI: 5.4-11.8个月)。没有新的安全问题和>;3级ae。原发性和获得性braf突变的NSCLC患者中最常见的共存癌基因是EGFR突变。原发性BRAF/EGFR共突变组与非EGFR共突变组在性别、吸烟史、组织学类型等方面存在显著差异。原发性和获得性BRAF/EGFR共突变患者表现出相似的临床特征,但EGFR共突变基因型不同。对于获得性BRAF/EGFR共突变和原发性BRAF/EGFR非19del共突变的NSCLC患者,三靶点治疗(达非尼、曲美替尼加第三EGFR TKIs)可被认为是首选方案。对于原发性BRAF/EGFR 19del共突变患者,在现实临床实践中首选的一线治疗仍然是基于EGFR TKIs的靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual, rifabutin-based triple, and bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori rescue treatment: a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised trial All-cause and cause-specific mortality among transgender and gender diverse people: a nationwide cohort study in Australia. Corrigendum to 'Playing to extinction': the commercial determinants of gambling-related harm, suicidality and suicide, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific Volume 63, October 2025, 101685. High rates of suppurative otitis media among children attending urban clinics in Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study. Progressing towards global hepatitis C elimination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of care cascades in key populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1