Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications in patients with HER2-low breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101378
Ang Zheng , Junlin He , Muyao Li , Fan Yao , Feng Jin , Bo Chen , Xin Wang
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications in patients with HER2-low breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Ang Zheng ,&nbsp;Junlin He ,&nbsp;Muyao Li ,&nbsp;Fan Yao ,&nbsp;Feng Jin ,&nbsp;Bo Chen ,&nbsp;Xin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HER2-low breast cancer represents a distinct biological subtype, and its clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes require further exploration. This study aimed to investigate disparities in short- and long-term outcomes between HER2-0 and HER2-low breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a Chinese cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 711 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals in China. Participants were categorised into HER2-0 and HER2-low subgroups based on immunohistochemical analysis. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, incorporating propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), were used to evaluate treatment outcomes, including real-world overall survival (rwOS), breast pathological complete response (bpCR), and objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Out of 303 patients included in the final analysis, 213 were classified as HER2-low and 90 as HER2-0. The majority were hormone receptor (HR)-positive, with varying TNM stages, Ki-67 expression levels, and menopausal status. Inclusion criteria were based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment and immunohistochemistry results. The overall rwOS rate for all patients was 86.1% (HER2-low: 87.3% vs. HER2-0: 83.3%). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no significant difference in rwOS between the HER2-low and HER2-0 groups before or after applying the IPTW method (log-rank P = 0.17, IPTW-weighted log-rank P = 0.45). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed no significant difference in rwOS between the groups (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–3.31). For breast pathological complete response (bpCR), 45 patients (21.1%) in the HER2-low group achieved bpCR compared to 16 patients (17.8%) in the HER2-0 group (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.6–2.75). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the odds of bpCR between the groups when adjusted using IPTW (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.72–1.64). Objective response rates (ORR) at 24 weeks were also comparable, with 137 patients (57.4%) in the HER2-low group and 61 patients (67.8%) in the HER2-0 group achieving a response. The IPTW-adjusted OR for ORR was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.77–1.57). Subgroup analysis revealed that in HR-negative patients, the HER2-low group exhibited significantly better outcomes compared to the HER2-0 group, with an rwOS HR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.23–0.77; P &lt; 0.001) and bpCR odds of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.14–6.29; P = 0.027). Conversely, among HR-positive patients, HER2-0 patients had a better rwOS than HER2-low patients (P &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>HER2-low breast cancer should be considered a distinct subtype with differing outcomes based on hormone receptor (HR) status. HR-negative patients with HER2-low tumors showed better overall survival and response rates compared to HER2-0 patients, suggesting enhanced chemotherapy sensitivity. Conversely, HR-positive HER2-0 patients had better survival, indicating potential treatment resistance in HER2-low HR-positive cases. These findings highlight the need for tailored treatment strategies for HER2-low breast cancer, especially for HR-positive patients, and suggest potential benefits from novel therapies like antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101378"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

HER2-low breast cancer represents a distinct biological subtype, and its clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes require further exploration. This study aimed to investigate disparities in short- and long-term outcomes between HER2-0 and HER2-low breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 711 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals in China. Participants were categorised into HER2-0 and HER2-low subgroups based on immunohistochemical analysis. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, incorporating propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), were used to evaluate treatment outcomes, including real-world overall survival (rwOS), breast pathological complete response (bpCR), and objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks.

Findings

Out of 303 patients included in the final analysis, 213 were classified as HER2-low and 90 as HER2-0. The majority were hormone receptor (HR)-positive, with varying TNM stages, Ki-67 expression levels, and menopausal status. Inclusion criteria were based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment and immunohistochemistry results. The overall rwOS rate for all patients was 86.1% (HER2-low: 87.3% vs. HER2-0: 83.3%). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no significant difference in rwOS between the HER2-low and HER2-0 groups before or after applying the IPTW method (log-rank P = 0.17, IPTW-weighted log-rank P = 0.45). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed no significant difference in rwOS between the groups (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–3.31). For breast pathological complete response (bpCR), 45 patients (21.1%) in the HER2-low group achieved bpCR compared to 16 patients (17.8%) in the HER2-0 group (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.6–2.75). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the odds of bpCR between the groups when adjusted using IPTW (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.72–1.64). Objective response rates (ORR) at 24 weeks were also comparable, with 137 patients (57.4%) in the HER2-low group and 61 patients (67.8%) in the HER2-0 group achieving a response. The IPTW-adjusted OR for ORR was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.77–1.57). Subgroup analysis revealed that in HR-negative patients, the HER2-low group exhibited significantly better outcomes compared to the HER2-0 group, with an rwOS HR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.23–0.77; P < 0.001) and bpCR odds of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.14–6.29; P = 0.027). Conversely, among HR-positive patients, HER2-0 patients had a better rwOS than HER2-low patients (P < 0.001).

Interpretation

HER2-low breast cancer should be considered a distinct subtype with differing outcomes based on hormone receptor (HR) status. HR-negative patients with HER2-low tumors showed better overall survival and response rates compared to HER2-0 patients, suggesting enhanced chemotherapy sensitivity. Conversely, HR-positive HER2-0 patients had better survival, indicating potential treatment resistance in HER2-low HR-positive cases. These findings highlight the need for tailored treatment strategies for HER2-low breast cancer, especially for HR-positive patients, and suggest potential benefits from novel therapies like antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受新辅助化疗的低her2乳腺癌患者的临床特征和预后意义:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:低her2乳腺癌是一种独特的生物学亚型,其临床特征和预后需要进一步探讨。本研究旨在探讨在中国队列中接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的HER2-0和her2 -低水平乳腺癌患者的短期和长期预后差异。方法回顾性多中心队列研究纳入2016年至2020年在中国四家三级医院诊断的711例乳腺癌患者。根据免疫组织化学分析,将参与者分为HER2-0和her2 -低亚组。采用Logistic和Cox回归分析,结合基于倾向评分的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW),评估治疗结果,包括真实世界总生存期(rwOS)、乳房病理完全缓解(bpCR)和24周客观缓解率(ORR)。在最终分析的303例患者中,213例her2 -低,90例HER2-0。大多数是激素受体(HR)阳性,有不同的TNM分期、Ki-67表达水平和绝经状态。纳入标准基于新辅助化疗和免疫组织化学结果。所有患者的总rwOS率为86.1% (HER2-low: 87.3% vs. HER2-0: 83.3%)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,应用IPTW方法前后HER2-low组和HER2-0组的rwOS无显著差异(log-rank P = 0.17, IPTW加权log-rank P = 0.45)。多因素Cox回归分析证实两组间rwOS无显著差异(经iptw校正的危险比[HR]: 1.60;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.78-3.31)。对于乳腺病理完全缓解(bpCR), her2 -低组中45例(21.1%)患者达到了bpCR,而HER2-0组中16例(17.8%)患者达到了bpCR(校正优势比[OR]: 1.26;95% ci: 0.6-2.75)。同样,使用IPTW校正后,两组间bpCR的几率无显著差异(OR: 1.08;95% ci: 0.72-1.64)。24周的客观缓解率(ORR)也具有可比性,her2 -低组有137例(57.4%)患者获得缓解,HER2-0组有61例(67.8%)患者获得缓解。经iptw校正的ORR OR为1.1 (95% CI: 0.77-1.57)。亚组分析显示,在HR阴性患者中,her2 -低组的预后明显优于HER2-0组,rwOS HR为0.42 (95% CI: 0.23-0.77;P & lt;0.001)和bpCR的比值为2.6 (95% CI: 1.14-6.29;P = 0.027)。相反,在hr阳性患者中,HER2-0患者的rwOS优于her2 -低患者(P <;0.001)。her2低乳腺癌应被认为是一种不同的亚型,根据激素受体(HR)状态有不同的结局。与HER2-0患者相比,hr阴性her2 -低肿瘤患者的总生存率和反应率更高,表明化疗敏感性增强。相反,hr阳性的HER2-0患者生存率更高,这表明her2 -低hr阳性病例有潜在的治疗耐药。这些发现强调了针对低her2乳腺癌,特别是hr阳性患者量身定制治疗策略的必要性,并提示了抗体-药物偶联物(adc)等新疗法的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Mass hepatitis C virus screening among persons in custody in Hong Kong: a modelling cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective cohort study G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination Social network distribution of HIV self-tests among MSM in Australia: a prospective, non-randomised trial Combating dengue using male Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes–lessons from Singapore's experience Efficacy and safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic MET exon 14-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: final results of a confirmatory Phase 3b study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1