Post-treatment adverse events ranking in targeted immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis based on risk probability assessment

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101324
Gaoyuan Yang , Zhicheng Yao
{"title":"Post-treatment adverse events ranking in targeted immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis based on risk probability assessment","authors":"Gaoyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The adoption of targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signifies a pivotal modern therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, a conspicuous gap exists in exhaustive research regarding the adverse effects of these medications in relation to their efficacy and influence on survival outcomes. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aim to assess the diverse frequencies and severities of specific adverse reactions induced by different targeted and immunotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical studies on targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients were selected from reputable databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from 2008 to 2023. These chosen studies encompassed a variety of treatment regimens. Data processing and evaluation adhered to PRISMA guidelines, utilizing a random-effects model for data synthesis. As all included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), bias assessment followed the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and was assessed using Revman 5.3 software. The Relative Risk (RR) was selected as the effect measure over Odds Ratio (OR) to enable a risk probability analysis that better suited the characteristics of the research findings. To ensure model convergence, researchers generated trajectory plots, density plots, and Brooks-Gelman-Rubin diagnostic plots, and calculated the Potential Scale Reduction Factor (PSRF). Heterogeneity was evaluated by determining the I2 for both direct and indirect comparisons within the network model.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A meticulous review of pertinent literature was conducted, identifying 13 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) covering 13 treatment protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including first-line and select second-line therapies. This study encompassed a total of 10,760 patients. Initially, adverse events within the same category were consolidated, followed by the sequential construction of a network model to evaluate the risk probabilities associated with various adverse events of different targeted immunotherapy regimens and establish priority rankings. The primary outcomes of the systematic evaluation included 38 types of adverse reactions, graded for severity based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). Additionally, statistical analysis was conducted on adverse events related to 28 immune checkpoint inhibitors, with each analyzed comprehensively to assess the risk probability of the corresponding drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Cabozantinib, camrelizumab, and their combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are linked to an elevated occurrence of prevalent adverse reactions. These reactions encompass elevated aminotransferase levels, fatigue, diarrhea, reduced appetite, nausea, thyroid dysfunction, hypertension, rash, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, and alopecia. In contrast, durvalumab, lenvatinib, and their combined therapy are less prone to induce common adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101324"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The adoption of targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signifies a pivotal modern therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, a conspicuous gap exists in exhaustive research regarding the adverse effects of these medications in relation to their efficacy and influence on survival outcomes. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aim to assess the diverse frequencies and severities of specific adverse reactions induced by different targeted and immunotherapy interventions.

Methods

Clinical studies on targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients were selected from reputable databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from 2008 to 2023. These chosen studies encompassed a variety of treatment regimens. Data processing and evaluation adhered to PRISMA guidelines, utilizing a random-effects model for data synthesis. As all included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), bias assessment followed the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and was assessed using Revman 5.3 software. The Relative Risk (RR) was selected as the effect measure over Odds Ratio (OR) to enable a risk probability analysis that better suited the characteristics of the research findings. To ensure model convergence, researchers generated trajectory plots, density plots, and Brooks-Gelman-Rubin diagnostic plots, and calculated the Potential Scale Reduction Factor (PSRF). Heterogeneity was evaluated by determining the I2 for both direct and indirect comparisons within the network model.

Findings

A meticulous review of pertinent literature was conducted, identifying 13 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) covering 13 treatment protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including first-line and select second-line therapies. This study encompassed a total of 10,760 patients. Initially, adverse events within the same category were consolidated, followed by the sequential construction of a network model to evaluate the risk probabilities associated with various adverse events of different targeted immunotherapy regimens and establish priority rankings. The primary outcomes of the systematic evaluation included 38 types of adverse reactions, graded for severity based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). Additionally, statistical analysis was conducted on adverse events related to 28 immune checkpoint inhibitors, with each analyzed comprehensively to assess the risk probability of the corresponding drugs.

Interpretation

Cabozantinib, camrelizumab, and their combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are linked to an elevated occurrence of prevalent adverse reactions. These reactions encompass elevated aminotransferase levels, fatigue, diarrhea, reduced appetite, nausea, thyroid dysfunction, hypertension, rash, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, and alopecia. In contrast, durvalumab, lenvatinib, and their combined therapy are less prone to induce common adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccination programme in China: a modelling study Strategies for the prevention of ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation in East Asia: clinical features, changes and challenges Prevalence of chronic kidney disease among Chinese adults with diabetes: a nationwide population-based cross-sectional study A randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of teprotumumab for active thyroid eye disease in Japanese patients Middle-age cerebral small vessel disease and cognitive function in later life: a population-based prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1