Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer: techniques, learning curve, and preliminary results

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101339
Zhjie Wu, Zuxiao Chen, Zongyan Li, Xiaoyan Fu, Yunxiang Luo, Qiongyu Hu, Haiyan Li
{"title":"Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer: techniques, learning curve, and preliminary results","authors":"Zhjie Wu,&nbsp;Zuxiao Chen,&nbsp;Zongyan Li,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Fu,&nbsp;Yunxiang Luo,&nbsp;Qiongyu Hu,&nbsp;Haiyan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (RALND) has little application experience. In patients with breast cancer that have positive lymph nodes, we present the initial outcomes of RALND.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined the medical records of individuals with breast cancer from a single institution that underwent RALND treatment between March 2024 and August 2024. The clinicopathological characteristics, learning curve, and consequences of RALND were investigated to determine the efficacy and safety of RALND.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 21 patients with RALND were included in the analysis. we reported that the Docking time took 8–10 minutes, and the average operation duration was 56.1 ± 14.6 min. After the accumulation of experience in 6 patients, the time required to complete RALND stabilized at about 60 minutes. The mean blood loss was 4.1 ± 2.1 mL, and the number of lymph nodes was 17.1 ± 5.6, of which 2.2 ± 3.5 were positive. All 21 patients had good shoulder joint movement (DASH score 10.82 ± 2.46), and no wound infection and lymphatic leakage were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>According to our initial experience, RALND is a safe surgical procedure that can decrease intraoperative bleeding and the effect on upper limb function, lower the incidence of complications, and potentially be an alternative technique for treating patients with positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101339"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660652400333X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (RALND) has little application experience. In patients with breast cancer that have positive lymph nodes, we present the initial outcomes of RALND.

Methods

We examined the medical records of individuals with breast cancer from a single institution that underwent RALND treatment between March 2024 and August 2024. The clinicopathological characteristics, learning curve, and consequences of RALND were investigated to determine the efficacy and safety of RALND.

Findings

A total of 21 patients with RALND were included in the analysis. we reported that the Docking time took 8–10 minutes, and the average operation duration was 56.1 ± 14.6 min. After the accumulation of experience in 6 patients, the time required to complete RALND stabilized at about 60 minutes. The mean blood loss was 4.1 ± 2.1 mL, and the number of lymph nodes was 17.1 ± 5.6, of which 2.2 ± 3.5 were positive. All 21 patients had good shoulder joint movement (DASH score 10.82 ± 2.46), and no wound infection and lymphatic leakage were observed.

Interpretation

According to our initial experience, RALND is a safe surgical procedure that can decrease intraoperative bleeding and the effect on upper limb function, lower the incidence of complications, and potentially be an alternative technique for treating patients with positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Short term safety profile of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in adults aged ≥ 60 years in Australia Shifting the way we conceptualise, research and intervene childhood obesity in China and Southeast Asian countries Assessing socioeconomic disparities in emerging hybrid food environments: a cross-sectional analysis of the DIGIFOOD dashboard Impulse oscillometry-derived equation for prediction of abnormal FEV1/FVC ratio for COPD screening in Chinese population: a multicenter cross-sectional study Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccination programme in China: a modelling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1