The effectiveness of the green bond instrument on stimulating firms' green innovation performance: A comparative study based on Chinese market

IF 5.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pacific-Basin Finance Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102706
Kaiwen Chang , Dan Luo , Kai Xing , Biao Mi
{"title":"The effectiveness of the green bond instrument on stimulating firms' green innovation performance: A comparative study based on Chinese market","authors":"Kaiwen Chang ,&nbsp;Dan Luo ,&nbsp;Kai Xing ,&nbsp;Biao Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green bonds have become an indispensable part of green finance system, offering a market-based solution for financing green innovation (GI). This study examines the impact of green bond issuance (GBI) on GI performance using Chinese listed firms' data from 2007 to 2019. The results show that GBI can promote the GI for both bond issuing firms and their industrial peers, with the impact generated on the former to be more significant. Compared with their peers, the issuing firms tend to focus more on green innovation quality, while the peers are more likely to achieve green innovation increment. Also, the heterogeneity analysis shows that external supervision is important to effectively trigger GI incentives of GBI. The relationship between GBI and GI is more prominent among the state-owned enterprise (SOE), non-heavily polluting firms, and in the eastern region. Furthermore, GBI promotes the GI performance of both issuing and peer firms through different channels. It provides the issuing firms with more R&amp;D investment while enhances the capital utilisation efficiency among peers. Consequently, it is suggested that effective polies should be set in place to ensure that the desired positive outcomes of GBI are achieved, and firms are guided towards more sustained development path.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102706"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25000435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green bonds have become an indispensable part of green finance system, offering a market-based solution for financing green innovation (GI). This study examines the impact of green bond issuance (GBI) on GI performance using Chinese listed firms' data from 2007 to 2019. The results show that GBI can promote the GI for both bond issuing firms and their industrial peers, with the impact generated on the former to be more significant. Compared with their peers, the issuing firms tend to focus more on green innovation quality, while the peers are more likely to achieve green innovation increment. Also, the heterogeneity analysis shows that external supervision is important to effectively trigger GI incentives of GBI. The relationship between GBI and GI is more prominent among the state-owned enterprise (SOE), non-heavily polluting firms, and in the eastern region. Furthermore, GBI promotes the GI performance of both issuing and peer firms through different channels. It provides the issuing firms with more R&D investment while enhances the capital utilisation efficiency among peers. Consequently, it is suggested that effective polies should be set in place to ensure that the desired positive outcomes of GBI are achieved, and firms are guided towards more sustained development path.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色债券工具对企业绿色创新绩效激励的有效性:基于中国市场的比较研究
绿色债券为绿色创新融资提供了市场化解决方案,已成为绿色金融体系不可或缺的重要组成部分。本研究利用2007 - 2019年中国上市公司的数据,考察了绿色债券发行对GI绩效的影响。结果表明,GBI对债券发行企业和行业同业的地理特征都有促进作用,且对前者的影响更为显著。与同行相比,发行公司更注重绿色创新质量,而同行更倾向于实现绿色创新增量。此外,异质性分析表明,外部监督对于有效触发GBI的GI激励至关重要。GBI和GI之间的关系在国有企业、非重污染企业和东部地区更为突出。此外,GBI通过不同渠道促进了发行公司和同行公司的GI绩效。它为发行公司提供了更多的研发投资,同时提高了同行间的资金利用效率。因此,建议制定有效的政策,以确保实现GBI的预期积极成果,并引导企业走向更可持续的发展道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.
期刊最新文献
The stabilizing effect of FinTech in real economy investment: Evidence from China Does environmental regulation inhibit rent-seeking by heavy-polluting firms? Evidence from China's new environmental protection law Costs of bank loans and industrial robot adoption: Cross-country evidence Government debt accountability supervision and corporate stock price volatility Cross-border financial risk transmission under China's bond market opening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1