Women's bodies as a global political arena: The abortion rights controversy in the U.S. and Italy, and the compulsory hijab debate in Iran

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103058
Francesca Calamita
{"title":"Women's bodies as a global political arena: The abortion rights controversy in the U.S. and Italy, and the compulsory hijab debate in Iran","authors":"Francesca Calamita","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Why is a woman's choice about her body often disregarded in both Western and non-Western countries? In June 2022, Roe v. Wade, was overturned in the U.S. In September 2022, Mahsa Amini died after being arrested by the Iranian police for not wearing the hijab correctly. Recently the number of gynecologists who refuse to perform abortions on moral grounds reached its highest peak in Italy.</div><div>Abortion rights and the hijab controversy might seem two very different issues, and conventionally they are not addressed together by academic literature on transnational womanhood. Yet they are underpinned by similar concerns about women's bodily autonomy. This article focuses on present-day abortion rights in the U.S. and Italy and the headscarf debate in Iran; it investigates how policing women's bodies in both Western and non-Western contexts is influenced by social norms and traditions, including religious orientations and culturally accepted misogynistic practices aimed at controlling the female part of the population. By comparing three different cultural contexts and framing the discussion in Western and non-Western feminist readings of women's bodies, it demonstrates that abortion bans and compulsory veiling imposed by local and national governments represent legislative efforts to enforce patriarchal norms in the broader global context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027753952500007X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why is a woman's choice about her body often disregarded in both Western and non-Western countries? In June 2022, Roe v. Wade, was overturned in the U.S. In September 2022, Mahsa Amini died after being arrested by the Iranian police for not wearing the hijab correctly. Recently the number of gynecologists who refuse to perform abortions on moral grounds reached its highest peak in Italy.
Abortion rights and the hijab controversy might seem two very different issues, and conventionally they are not addressed together by academic literature on transnational womanhood. Yet they are underpinned by similar concerns about women's bodily autonomy. This article focuses on present-day abortion rights in the U.S. and Italy and the headscarf debate in Iran; it investigates how policing women's bodies in both Western and non-Western contexts is influenced by social norms and traditions, including religious orientations and culturally accepted misogynistic practices aimed at controlling the female part of the population. By comparing three different cultural contexts and framing the discussion in Western and non-Western feminist readings of women's bodies, it demonstrates that abortion bans and compulsory veiling imposed by local and national governments represent legislative efforts to enforce patriarchal norms in the broader global context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性的身体作为一个全球政治舞台:美国和意大利的堕胎权争议,以及伊朗强制戴头巾的辩论
为什么女性对自己身体的选择在西方和非西方国家都经常被忽视?2022年6月,罗伊诉韦德案在美国被推翻。2022年9月,马赫萨·阿米尼因没有正确佩戴头巾而被伊朗警方逮捕后死亡。最近,在意大利,以道德理由拒绝堕胎的妇科医生数量达到了最高峰。堕胎权和头巾争议似乎是两个截然不同的问题,传统上,关于跨国女性的学术文献不会把它们放在一起讨论。然而,对女性身体自主权的类似担忧也支持了这些观点。本文关注的是当今美国和意大利的堕胎权,以及伊朗关于头巾的辩论;它调查了在西方和非西方背景下,对妇女身体的监管如何受到社会规范和传统的影响,包括宗教取向和文化上接受的旨在控制女性人口的厌女症做法。通过比较三种不同的文化背景,并在西方和非西方女性主义对女性身体的解读中构建讨论框架,它表明,地方和国家政府实施的堕胎禁令和强制性面纱代表了在更广泛的全球背景下实施父权规范的立法努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Religious identity, national sovereignty, and sexual minority rights in the 2024 and 2025 Romanian presidential elections: A qualitative study of candidate discourses and voter alignments Stigma, surveillance, and feminized aftermaths: An intersectional feminist inquiry into the lives of women and children in former terrorist families in Indonesia ‘Is Romania ready for a female president?’: Motherhood, nation and gender in the performance of women presidential candidates (2024–2025) Reframing folklore: Women's desire, duty, and agency in Paheli Friendship as feminist resistance across seven decades: How three Kibbutz women navigated community collectivism, 1920s–1990s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1